Teori State Auxiliary Bodies dan Trigger Mechanism Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Penanganan Korupsi di Daerah

Muhammad Taufiq Firdaus, Artike History
{"title":"Teori State Auxiliary Bodies dan Trigger Mechanism Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Penanganan Korupsi di Daerah","authors":"Muhammad Taufiq Firdaus, Artike History","doi":"10.46870/jhki.v4i2.750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia's anti-corruption institution, namely the Corruption Eradication Commit-tee (KPK), as a state auxiliary body (supporting state institution) has various prob-lems. The KPK is only based in Jakarta and is connected centrally. This condition increases the freedom for regional officials to commit criminal acts of corruption especially in the regions. The KPK as a trigger mechanism for the Prosecutor's Of-fice and the Police is still not effective in handling corruption in the regions. This research is qualitative research with exploratory nature with juridical-normative method. The purpose of this study is to explore more about the theory of state auxil-iary bodies, especially the design of the KPK in handling corruption in the regions, as well as knowing the role of the KPK as a trigger mechanism together with the police and prosecutors in handling and eradicating corruption in the regions. The finding in this research contained that the trigger mechanism function by the Corrup-tion Eradication Commission is necessary. The centralized position of the KPK is less effective in handling corruption in the regions. Several factors in the KPK's in-effective handling of corruption in the regions include; Firstly, the KPK's work area is too broad, relying solely on the KPK's centralized position, resulting in the KPK being overwhelmed several times in handling cases in the regions. Second, the Cor-ruption Eradication Commission's infrastructure is very limited, starting from human resources to the KPK's very limited budget, which does not allow the KPK to handle cases in all regions in Indonesia. Third, the Corruption Eradication Commission needs KPK representatives in several regions to support handling corruption in the regions.","PeriodicalId":287700,"journal":{"name":"QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v4i2.750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia's anti-corruption institution, namely the Corruption Eradication Commit-tee (KPK), as a state auxiliary body (supporting state institution) has various prob-lems. The KPK is only based in Jakarta and is connected centrally. This condition increases the freedom for regional officials to commit criminal acts of corruption especially in the regions. The KPK as a trigger mechanism for the Prosecutor's Of-fice and the Police is still not effective in handling corruption in the regions. This research is qualitative research with exploratory nature with juridical-normative method. The purpose of this study is to explore more about the theory of state auxil-iary bodies, especially the design of the KPK in handling corruption in the regions, as well as knowing the role of the KPK as a trigger mechanism together with the police and prosecutors in handling and eradicating corruption in the regions. The finding in this research contained that the trigger mechanism function by the Corrup-tion Eradication Commission is necessary. The centralized position of the KPK is less effective in handling corruption in the regions. Several factors in the KPK's in-effective handling of corruption in the regions include; Firstly, the KPK's work area is too broad, relying solely on the KPK's centralized position, resulting in the KPK being overwhelmed several times in handling cases in the regions. Second, the Cor-ruption Eradication Commission's infrastructure is very limited, starting from human resources to the KPK's very limited budget, which does not allow the KPK to handle cases in all regions in Indonesia. Third, the Corruption Eradication Commission needs KPK representatives in several regions to support handling corruption in the regions.
国家辅助机构理论与消除腐败委员会处理地区腐败问题的触发机制
印度尼西亚的反腐败机构,即根除腐败委员会(KPK),作为国家辅助机构(支持性国家机构),存在各种问题。KPK 仅设在雅加达,与中央保持联系。这种情况增加了地区官员尤其是地区官员实施腐败犯罪行为的自由度。作为检察院和警方的触发机制,KPK 在处理各地区的腐败问题方面仍不得力。本研究为定性研究,采用司法规范法进行探索。本研究的目的是进一步探索国家辅助机构的理论,尤其是 KPK 在处理地区腐败问题中的设计,以及了解 KPK 作为触发机制与警察和检察官在处理和消除地区腐败问题中的作用。研究结果表明,根除腐败委员会的触发机制功能是必要的。根除腐败委员会的中央集权地位在处理各地区腐败问题时效果不佳。导致根除腐败委员会在处理地区腐败问题时效果不佳的几个因素包括:第一,根除腐败委员会的工作领域过于宽泛,仅仅依靠根除腐败委员会的中央集权地位,导致根除腐败委员会在处理地区案件时多次力不从心。其次,根除腐败委员会的基础设施非常有限,从人力资源到 KPK 的预算都非常有限,这使得 KPK 无法处理印尼所有地区的案件。第三,根除腐败委员会需要在几个地区派驻根除腐败委员会的代表,以支持处理各地区的腐败问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信