Enhancing the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission: Insights from Hong Kong, United Kingdom, and European Union

Mustafa Lutfi, Ramadhita Ramadhita, Septiani Septiani, Asrul Ibrahim Nur
{"title":"Enhancing the Supervisory Board of the Corruption Eradication Commission: Insights from Hong Kong, United Kingdom, and European Union","authors":"Mustafa Lutfi, Ramadhita Ramadhita, Septiani Septiani, Asrul Ibrahim Nur","doi":"10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.71785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing the KPK Supervisory Board as a juridical consequence of Law Number 19 of 2019 is an effort to improve KPK's supervisory system. But its formation has caused many pros and cons in the community. The existence of this board is considered to weaken and hinder the performance of KPK. This study analyzes the position of the KPK Supervisory Board after Constitutional Court Decree Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019 concerning reducing the pro-Justitia authority of the Supervisory Board regarding the comparative study involving several countries. This study uses legal research with comparative and statutory approaches. The study results show that the KPK Supervisory Board, as the KPK's internal supervisory body, still requires adjustments by adopting the supervisory mechanisms implemented by comparator countries relevant to the Indonesian Legal System. Some of these are related to the mechanism of monitoring and evaluation of the performance of the KPK Supervisory Board and the KPK itself.","PeriodicalId":507494,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia Jurnal Hukum","volume":"3 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia Jurnal Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.71785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Establishing the KPK Supervisory Board as a juridical consequence of Law Number 19 of 2019 is an effort to improve KPK's supervisory system. But its formation has caused many pros and cons in the community. The existence of this board is considered to weaken and hinder the performance of KPK. This study analyzes the position of the KPK Supervisory Board after Constitutional Court Decree Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019 concerning reducing the pro-Justitia authority of the Supervisory Board regarding the comparative study involving several countries. This study uses legal research with comparative and statutory approaches. The study results show that the KPK Supervisory Board, as the KPK's internal supervisory body, still requires adjustments by adopting the supervisory mechanisms implemented by comparator countries relevant to the Indonesian Legal System. Some of these are related to the mechanism of monitoring and evaluation of the performance of the KPK Supervisory Board and the KPK itself.
加强消除腐败委员会的监事会:香港、英国和欧盟的启示
作为 2019 年第 19 号法律的法律后果,成立 KPK 监事会是完善 KPK 监督体系的一项努力。但它的成立在社会上引起了许多利弊。该委员会的存在被认为会削弱和阻碍 KPK 的绩效。本研究通过对多个国家的比较研究,分析了宪法法院第 70/PUU-XVII/2019 号关于减少监事会亲司法权力的法令颁布后 KPK 监事会的地位。本研究采用比较法和法定法进行法律研究。研究结果表明,金伯利进程监督委员会作为金伯利进程的内部监督机构,仍需通过采用参照国实施的与印尼法律体系相关的监督机制进行调整。其中一些调整涉及 KPK 监事会和 KPK 自身绩效的监督和评估机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信