Longtao Wu, Hui Su, Xubin Zeng, Derek J. Posselt, Sun Wong, Shuyi Chen, A. Stoffelen
{"title":"Uncertainty of Atmospheric Winds in Three Widely Used Global Reanalysis Datasets","authors":"Longtao Wu, Hui Su, Xubin Zeng, Derek J. Posselt, Sun Wong, Shuyi Chen, A. Stoffelen","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atmospheric winds are crucial to the transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical species, facilitating Earth’s climate system interactions. Existing weather and climate studies rely heavily on the wind fields from reanalysis datasets. In this study, we analyze the uncertainty of instantaneous atmospheric winds in three reanalysis (ERA5, MERRA2 and CFSv2) datasets. We show that the mean wind vector differences (WVDs) between the reanalysis datasets are about 3–6 m s−1 in the troposphere. The mean absolute wind direction differences can be more than 50°. Large WVDs greater than 5 m s−1 are found for 30–50% of the time when the observed precipitation rate is larger than 0.1 mm hr−1 over Eastern Pacific, Indian Ocean, Atlantic and some mountain areas. The mean WVDs exhibit seasonal variations but no significant diurnal variations. The uncertainty of vertical wind shear has a correlation of 0.59 with the uncertainty of winds at 300 hPa. The magnitudes of vorticity and horizontal divergence uncertainties are on the order of 1×10−5 s−1, which is comparable to the mean values of vorticity and horizontal divergence. In comparison to some limited observations from field campaigns, the reanalysis datasets exhibit a mean WVD ranging from 2–4.5 m s−1. Among the three reanalysis datasets, ERA5 shows the closest agreement with the observations while MERRA2 has the largest discrepancy. The substantial uncertainty and errors of the reanalysis wind products highlight the critical need for new satellite missions dedicated to 3D wind measurements.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":"9 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0198.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Atmospheric winds are crucial to the transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical species, facilitating Earth’s climate system interactions. Existing weather and climate studies rely heavily on the wind fields from reanalysis datasets. In this study, we analyze the uncertainty of instantaneous atmospheric winds in three reanalysis (ERA5, MERRA2 and CFSv2) datasets. We show that the mean wind vector differences (WVDs) between the reanalysis datasets are about 3–6 m s−1 in the troposphere. The mean absolute wind direction differences can be more than 50°. Large WVDs greater than 5 m s−1 are found for 30–50% of the time when the observed precipitation rate is larger than 0.1 mm hr−1 over Eastern Pacific, Indian Ocean, Atlantic and some mountain areas. The mean WVDs exhibit seasonal variations but no significant diurnal variations. The uncertainty of vertical wind shear has a correlation of 0.59 with the uncertainty of winds at 300 hPa. The magnitudes of vorticity and horizontal divergence uncertainties are on the order of 1×10−5 s−1, which is comparable to the mean values of vorticity and horizontal divergence. In comparison to some limited observations from field campaigns, the reanalysis datasets exhibit a mean WVD ranging from 2–4.5 m s−1. Among the three reanalysis datasets, ERA5 shows the closest agreement with the observations while MERRA2 has the largest discrepancy. The substantial uncertainty and errors of the reanalysis wind products highlight the critical need for new satellite missions dedicated to 3D wind measurements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.