Acceptance of digital twins of customer demands for supply chain optimisation: an analysis of three hierarchical digital twin levels

Dominik Oehlschläger, Andreas H. Glas, Michael Essig
{"title":"Acceptance of digital twins of customer demands for supply chain optimisation: an analysis of three hierarchical digital twin levels","authors":"Dominik Oehlschläger, Andreas H. Glas, Michael Essig","doi":"10.1108/imds-07-2023-0467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeInaccurate capturing and processing of customer requirements result in negative economic and ecological effects. Digital twins of customer demands promise to remedy these issues. However, successful implementation necessitates users' technology acceptance. This study contrasts three hierarchical digital twin levels with different degrees of user integration and examines determinants for their respective acceptance.Design/methodology/approachA structural equation model is applied in a comparative manner, considering different levels of digital twin radicalness. A multidimensional approach is used to measure attitudes towards usage. Data are collected in the context of organisational supply management.FindingsResults show harmonious effects across digital twin levels. This indicates that technological radicality plays only a subordinate role when assessing acceptance determinants such as user perception on ease of use, usefulness, trust and risk.Practical implicationsRather than focussing solely on technological factors, findings suggest that users prioritise the actual outcome and efficiency of the system. This perspective offers practical implications for organisations seeking to implement advanced systems and emphasises the significance of user perceptions beyond technological features.Social implicationsThe societal impact of this research are an appreciation of customer roles in the supply chain where an enhanced detection of customer needs and preferences aligns businesses with the dynamic and evolving demands of a diverse and a continuously environmentally-conscious consumer base.Originality/valueThis study applies a measurement model for technology acceptance in a unique and multidimensional manner. Thereby, a comparative analysis of user perceptions across different digital twin levels sheds more light on a nascent, promising and underexplored technological method. This interdisciplinary research combined knowledge from the supply chain management and management information systems fields by highlighting key factors for the adoption of complex technological methods.","PeriodicalId":270213,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-07-2023-0467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeInaccurate capturing and processing of customer requirements result in negative economic and ecological effects. Digital twins of customer demands promise to remedy these issues. However, successful implementation necessitates users' technology acceptance. This study contrasts three hierarchical digital twin levels with different degrees of user integration and examines determinants for their respective acceptance.Design/methodology/approachA structural equation model is applied in a comparative manner, considering different levels of digital twin radicalness. A multidimensional approach is used to measure attitudes towards usage. Data are collected in the context of organisational supply management.FindingsResults show harmonious effects across digital twin levels. This indicates that technological radicality plays only a subordinate role when assessing acceptance determinants such as user perception on ease of use, usefulness, trust and risk.Practical implicationsRather than focussing solely on technological factors, findings suggest that users prioritise the actual outcome and efficiency of the system. This perspective offers practical implications for organisations seeking to implement advanced systems and emphasises the significance of user perceptions beyond technological features.Social implicationsThe societal impact of this research are an appreciation of customer roles in the supply chain where an enhanced detection of customer needs and preferences aligns businesses with the dynamic and evolving demands of a diverse and a continuously environmentally-conscious consumer base.Originality/valueThis study applies a measurement model for technology acceptance in a unique and multidimensional manner. Thereby, a comparative analysis of user perceptions across different digital twin levels sheds more light on a nascent, promising and underexplored technological method. This interdisciplinary research combined knowledge from the supply chain management and management information systems fields by highlighting key factors for the adoption of complex technological methods.
客户需求数字孪生对供应链优化的接受度:对三个层次数字孪生的分析
目的不准确地捕捉和处理客户需求会对经济和生态产生负面影响。客户需求数字双胞胎有望解决这些问题。然而,成功实施的前提是用户接受技术。本研究对比了用户集成度不同的三个数字孪生层次,并研究了它们各自接受程度的决定因素。 设计/方法/途径 考虑到数字孪生的不同激进程度,本研究以对比的方式应用了结构方程模型。采用多维方法来衡量使用态度。数据是在组织供应管理的背景下收集的。这表明,在评估用户对易用性、实用性、信任度和风险的感知等接受度决定因素时,技术激进性只起辅助作用。实际意义研究结果表明,用户并非只关注技术因素,而是优先考虑系统的实际效果和效率。本研究的社会影响是对供应链中客户角色的认识,通过加强对客户需求和偏好的检测,使企业能够满足不断变化的动态需求,满足多样化且具有持续环保意识的消费群体的需求。因此,通过对不同数字孪生水平的用户感知进行比较分析,可以更深入地了解一种新兴的、前景广阔且尚未得到充分探索的技术方法。这项跨学科研究结合了供应链管理和管理信息系统领域的知识,强调了采用复杂技术方法的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信