Radiologic imaging utilization in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

Simone A. Jarrett, Sujani Yadlapati, Kevin B. Lo, Brenda Chiang, J. M. M. Manzano, Ahmad Raja, Jordan Carty, N. Musoke, Camila Salazar, Lisa Barrett, Ammaar Wattoo, Z. Azmaiparashvili, Daniel Baik
{"title":"Radiologic imaging utilization in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis","authors":"Simone A. Jarrett, Sujani Yadlapati, Kevin B. Lo, Brenda Chiang, J. M. M. Manzano, Ahmad Raja, Jordan Carty, N. Musoke, Camila Salazar, Lisa Barrett, Ammaar Wattoo, Z. Azmaiparashvili, Daniel Baik","doi":"10.54844/gfm.2023.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Acute pancreatitis is a major cause of hospitalizations in the United States. Imaging is often unwarranted in early, uncomplicated pancreatitis however can prove to be useful in specific clinical scenarios. This study aimed to investigate whether our institution overutilizes abdominal imaging in diagnosis of pancreatitis. Methods: Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution between 2015 and 2020 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. A total of 669 patients met the criteria for acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta Classification. The data was presented using frequencies and percentages and patients with abdominal imaging were compared to those without. Mann Whitney U test and chi-square test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with the performance of abdominal imaging. Results: Our results found that 495 patients (74%) had an abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan, while 363 patients (52%) had an abdominal ultrasound. More than half of the patients who already met 2 out of 3 clinical and laboratory criteria of the revised Atlanta classification still underwent abdominal imaging, even though it was not necessary. However, we found no significant difference in outcomes between patients who underwent imaging and those who did not, including the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and inpatient death. Conclusion: A significant number of patients admitted for acute pancreatitis undergo abdominal imaging even after fulfilling clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria.","PeriodicalId":137309,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Functional Medicine","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Functional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54844/gfm.2023.480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Acute pancreatitis is a major cause of hospitalizations in the United States. Imaging is often unwarranted in early, uncomplicated pancreatitis however can prove to be useful in specific clinical scenarios. This study aimed to investigate whether our institution overutilizes abdominal imaging in diagnosis of pancreatitis. Methods: Patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our institution between 2015 and 2020 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. A total of 669 patients met the criteria for acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta Classification. The data was presented using frequencies and percentages and patients with abdominal imaging were compared to those without. Mann Whitney U test and chi-square test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with the performance of abdominal imaging. Results: Our results found that 495 patients (74%) had an abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan, while 363 patients (52%) had an abdominal ultrasound. More than half of the patients who already met 2 out of 3 clinical and laboratory criteria of the revised Atlanta classification still underwent abdominal imaging, even though it was not necessary. However, we found no significant difference in outcomes between patients who underwent imaging and those who did not, including the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and inpatient death. Conclusion: A significant number of patients admitted for acute pancreatitis undergo abdominal imaging even after fulfilling clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria.
利用放射成像诊断急性胰腺炎
背景和目的:在美国,急性胰腺炎是住院治疗的主要原因。在早期无并发症的胰腺炎中,通常不需要进行造影检查,但在特定的临床情况下,造影检查可能会被证明是有用的。本研究旨在调查我院在诊断胰腺炎时是否过度使用了腹部成像。方法:使用国际疾病诊断代码分类法对我院 2015 年至 2020 年期间收治的急性胰腺炎患者进行识别。根据修订后的亚特兰大分类法,共有 669 名患者符合急性胰腺炎的标准。数据以频数和百分比表示,并将进行腹部成像的患者与未进行腹部成像的患者进行比较。曼-惠特尼 U 检验和卡方检验分别用于比较连续变量和分类变量。采用单变量和多变量回归分析来分析与进行腹部成像相关的因素。结果我们的结果发现,495 名患者(74%)进行了腹部计算机断层扫描(CT),363 名患者(52%)进行了腹部超声波检查。在已经符合修订版亚特兰大分类法 3 项临床和实验室标准中的 2 项标准的患者中,有一半以上的患者尽管没有必要进行腹部造影,但仍然进行了腹部造影。然而,我们发现接受成像检查的患者与未接受成像检查的患者在预后(包括机械通气需求、入住重症监护室和住院死亡)方面没有明显差异。结论大量急性胰腺炎入院患者即使符合临床和实验室诊断标准,也要接受腹部造影检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信