Contemporary diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps

Theodoros E. Pavlidis, Ioannis N Galanis
{"title":"Contemporary diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps","authors":"Theodoros E. Pavlidis, Ioannis N Galanis","doi":"10.54844/gfm.2023.508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gallbladder (GB) polyps are present in 5%–10% of the general population and consist of true neoplastic polyps (adenomas) and pseudopolyps (predominantly cholesterol, inflammatory, hyperplastic, focal adenomyomatosis). True polyps, although relatively rare neoplastic lesions (0.5%) are considered an important factor in malignant transformation and cancer development (5%) when their size is ≥ 1 cm. Given that it is essential to diagnose GB adenocarcinoma at an early stage to optimize therapeutic management, controversy exists about whether cholecystectomy is always necessary. Their imaging characteristics, size ≥ 1 cm, age > 50 years and genetic predisposition determine the indications for immediate cholecystectomy. In younger patients with polyps < 1 cm in size and without a familial history of GB carcinoma, imaging follow-up by ultrasound (US) seems to be a reasonable recommended policy. A scoring system by multivariate analysis (cross-sectional area > 123 mm2, positive blood flow signal, age > 55.5 years, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 50 U/L and an ALT/AST (aspartate aminotransferase) ratio > 0.77) can accurately predict true polyps. The widely accepted size threshold for US follow-up is 7 mm, and for intervention, it is 10 mm. Computed tomography or better magnetic resonance imaging can overcome any misdiagnosis of conventional US incidental findings alone that may lead to potentially unnecessary operations. In challenging cases, high-resolution US, novel three-dimensional US, endoscopic US or contrast-enhanced endoscopic US could be helpful. Novel microflow imaging can safely predict polyps. Risk factors for malignancy include age > 60 years, large gallstones, primary sclerosing cholangitis, Asian ethnicity and sessile polyps accompanied by focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm. For polyps sized 6–9 mm, the absence of growth at recommended follow-up (6 months, one year, and two years) indicates treatment discontinuation; however, it is not required for size < 5 mm without risk factors. In addition to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard management, novel interventional modalities preserving the GB in selected cases include per-oral transmural endoscopic resection of GB polyps after a bridge of endoscopic US-guided cholecystostomy or laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving polypectomy. Generally, there are still no precise and strong evidence-based guidelines; thus, the management policy of GB polyps should be individualized in ambiguous cases.","PeriodicalId":137309,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Functional Medicine","volume":"112 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Functional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54844/gfm.2023.508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gallbladder (GB) polyps are present in 5%–10% of the general population and consist of true neoplastic polyps (adenomas) and pseudopolyps (predominantly cholesterol, inflammatory, hyperplastic, focal adenomyomatosis). True polyps, although relatively rare neoplastic lesions (0.5%) are considered an important factor in malignant transformation and cancer development (5%) when their size is ≥ 1 cm. Given that it is essential to diagnose GB adenocarcinoma at an early stage to optimize therapeutic management, controversy exists about whether cholecystectomy is always necessary. Their imaging characteristics, size ≥ 1 cm, age > 50 years and genetic predisposition determine the indications for immediate cholecystectomy. In younger patients with polyps < 1 cm in size and without a familial history of GB carcinoma, imaging follow-up by ultrasound (US) seems to be a reasonable recommended policy. A scoring system by multivariate analysis (cross-sectional area > 123 mm2, positive blood flow signal, age > 55.5 years, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 50 U/L and an ALT/AST (aspartate aminotransferase) ratio > 0.77) can accurately predict true polyps. The widely accepted size threshold for US follow-up is 7 mm, and for intervention, it is 10 mm. Computed tomography or better magnetic resonance imaging can overcome any misdiagnosis of conventional US incidental findings alone that may lead to potentially unnecessary operations. In challenging cases, high-resolution US, novel three-dimensional US, endoscopic US or contrast-enhanced endoscopic US could be helpful. Novel microflow imaging can safely predict polyps. Risk factors for malignancy include age > 60 years, large gallstones, primary sclerosing cholangitis, Asian ethnicity and sessile polyps accompanied by focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm. For polyps sized 6–9 mm, the absence of growth at recommended follow-up (6 months, one year, and two years) indicates treatment discontinuation; however, it is not required for size < 5 mm without risk factors. In addition to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard management, novel interventional modalities preserving the GB in selected cases include per-oral transmural endoscopic resection of GB polyps after a bridge of endoscopic US-guided cholecystostomy or laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving polypectomy. Generally, there are still no precise and strong evidence-based guidelines; thus, the management policy of GB polyps should be individualized in ambiguous cases.
胆囊息肉的现代诊断和管理
胆囊(GB)息肉的发病率占总人口的 5%-10%,由真正的肿瘤性息肉(腺瘤)和假性息肉(主要是胆固醇性、炎症性、增生性、局灶性腺肌瘤病)组成。真性息肉虽然是相对罕见的肿瘤性病变(0.5%),但当其大小≥ 1 厘米时,被认为是恶性转化和癌症发展(5%)的重要因素。鉴于早期诊断胆囊腺癌对优化治疗管理至关重要,关于是否一定需要进行胆囊切除术还存在争议。患者的影像学特征、息肉大小≥ 1 厘米、年龄大于 50 岁以及遗传倾向决定了是否需要立即进行胆囊切除术。对于息肉大小小于 1 厘米且无家族性胆囊癌病史的年轻患者,超声(US)成像随访似乎是一项合理的推荐政策。多变量分析评分系统(横截面积 > 123 mm2、血流信号阳性、年龄 > 55.5 岁、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平 > 50 U/L、ALT/AST(天冬氨酸氨基转移酶)比值 > 0.77)可准确预测真正的息肉。广泛接受的 US 随访阈值为 7 毫米,干预阈值为 10 毫米。计算机断层扫描或更好的磁共振成像可克服仅靠传统 US 偶然发现而可能导致不必要手术的误诊。在具有挑战性的病例中,高分辨率 US、新型三维 US、内窥镜 US 或对比增强内窥镜 US 可能会有所帮助。新型微流成像可以安全地预测息肉。恶性息肉的风险因素包括:年龄大于 60 岁、大块胆结石、原发性硬化性胆管炎、亚裔、无柄息肉伴局灶性胆囊壁增厚大于 4 毫米。对于大小为 6-9 毫米的息肉,如果在建议的随访(6 个月、1 年和 2 年)中没有生长,则应停止治疗;但对于大小小于 5 毫米且无风险因素的息肉,则不需要随访。除了腹腔镜胆囊切除术这一标准治疗方法外,在特定病例中保留胆囊的新型介入方法还包括在内镜US引导胆囊造口术或腹腔镜保留胆囊息肉切除术的桥接之后,经口经壁内镜切除胆囊息肉。一般来说,目前仍没有精确有力的循证指南,因此,对于不明确的病例,应根据个体情况制定胆囊息肉的治疗政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信