Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Catrin Hedd Jones, Diane Seddon, Katherine Algar-Skaife, Carol Maddock, Stephanie Green
{"title":"Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice","authors":"Catrin Hedd Jones, Diane Seddon, Katherine Algar-Skaife, Carol Maddock, Stephanie Green","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-03-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to share how the Centre for Ageing and Dementia Research co-designs research within a national programme of work to improve the lives of older adults and those affected by dementia. Through examples of this work, the authors identify the barriers and enablers to participatory approaches and lessons to inform future involvement activities. Design/methodology/approach This study reflects on implementing the UK National Standards for Public Involvement into practice. Of international relevance, the observations span the research process from research prioritisation and design to research implementation and knowledge exchange. Findings This study demonstrates the importance of using a relational approach, working toward a common purpose and engaging in meaningful dialogue. Only through offering choice and flexibility and actively learning from one another can co-design lead to synergistic relationships that benefit everyone. Research limitations/implications Key implications for researchers engaged in patient and public involvement are be receptive to other people’s views and acknowledge expertise of those with lived experience alongside those with academic expertise. Training, resources and time are required to effectively support involvement and meaningful relationships. A nominated contact person enables trust and mutual understanding to develop. This is an ongoing collective learning experience that should be embedded throughout the entire research process. Originality/value This paper demonstrates how the standards are implemented with people who are often excluded from research to influence a national programme of work.","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":"73 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-03-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to share how the Centre for Ageing and Dementia Research co-designs research within a national programme of work to improve the lives of older adults and those affected by dementia. Through examples of this work, the authors identify the barriers and enablers to participatory approaches and lessons to inform future involvement activities. Design/methodology/approach This study reflects on implementing the UK National Standards for Public Involvement into practice. Of international relevance, the observations span the research process from research prioritisation and design to research implementation and knowledge exchange. Findings This study demonstrates the importance of using a relational approach, working toward a common purpose and engaging in meaningful dialogue. Only through offering choice and flexibility and actively learning from one another can co-design lead to synergistic relationships that benefit everyone. Research limitations/implications Key implications for researchers engaged in patient and public involvement are be receptive to other people’s views and acknowledge expertise of those with lived experience alongside those with academic expertise. Training, resources and time are required to effectively support involvement and meaningful relationships. A nominated contact person enables trust and mutual understanding to develop. This is an ongoing collective learning experience that should be embedded throughout the entire research process. Originality/value This paper demonstrates how the standards are implemented with people who are often excluded from research to influence a national programme of work.
让老年人和无酬照护者参与研究周期:关于将英国公众参与国家标准付诸实践的思考
目的 本文旨在分享老龄化与痴呆症研究中心如何在国家工作计划内共同设计研究,以改善老年人和痴呆症患者的生活。通过这项工作的实例,作者指出了参与式方法的障碍和有利因素,并总结了经验教训,为今后的参与活动提供参考。 设计/方法/途径 本研究反映了英国公众参与国家标准在实践中的实施情况。从研究的优先次序和设计到研究的实施和知识交流,研究过程中的观察具有国际意义。 研究结果 这项研究表明了采用关系方法、为共同目标而努力以及开展有意义对话的重要性。只有通过提供选择和灵活性并积极相互学习,共同设计才能产生协同关系,使每个人受益。 研究局限性/启示 对参与患者和公众参与的研究人员的主要启示是,要善于接受他人的意见,并承认具有生活经验的人和具有学术专长的人的专业知识。需要培训、资源和时间来有效支持参与和建立有意义的关系。指定联络人可以促进信任和相互理解。这是一种持续的集体学习体验,应贯穿整个研究过程。 原创性/价值 本文展示了如何与经常被排除在研究之外的人员一起实施标准,以影响国家工作计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信