CONTENT ANALYSIS OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS RELATED TO MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISOR TOOTH MANIPULATION

Nihal Özcan, Nazlı Nihal Saribacak
{"title":"CONTENT ANALYSIS OF YOUTUBE VIDEOS RELATED TO MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISOR TOOTH MANIPULATION","authors":"Nihal Özcan, Nazlı Nihal Saribacak","doi":"10.61139/ijdor.1373608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Today video sharing platforms on Internet like Youtube has become an important source of information in many areas like health. purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the suitability, usefulness, and quality of Youtube video contents related to 'Maxillary Central Incisive Tooth Manipulation’ used by dentistry students for first-year preclinical education. MATERIAL and METHODS: A scoring system consisting of 10 parameters was used to asses the video content quality. The viewership, likes, comments, reliability of information, global quality scores(GQS), and video duration were recorded for evaluation with parameters by two dentists according to the uploader (dentist, dentistry student, dental technician) and the information content (high, medium, poor quality). Group comparisons were analysed using the Kruskal Wallis H and post-hoc Tamhane’s T2 test. RESULTS: 20 relevant videos were classified as 55% high(GQS 4.7±0.6), 35% medium(GQS 3.3±1.6), and 10% considered poor quality(GQS 1.0±0). Evaluated according to their quality, no significant difference was found between the parameters except GQS(p=0.013). The videos are as follows, in order of their sources: dentists(n=6,30%), dentistry students(n=11,55%) and dental technicians(n=3,15%). CONCLUSION: The fact that there was no difference in the viewing and popularity of useful and misleading videos revealed that the high quality video could not be chosen by the video viewers. In this study, it was concluded that dentistry students should pay particular attention to the video provider while providing video access to support their preclinical education. Health academics and health institutions need to increase studies on 'pre-clinical practice courses' and try to raise awareness by uploading more useful and systematic videos to the internet/YouTube.","PeriodicalId":147898,"journal":{"name":"HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRU International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61139/ijdor.1373608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today video sharing platforms on Internet like Youtube has become an important source of information in many areas like health. purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the suitability, usefulness, and quality of Youtube video contents related to 'Maxillary Central Incisive Tooth Manipulation’ used by dentistry students for first-year preclinical education. MATERIAL and METHODS: A scoring system consisting of 10 parameters was used to asses the video content quality. The viewership, likes, comments, reliability of information, global quality scores(GQS), and video duration were recorded for evaluation with parameters by two dentists according to the uploader (dentist, dentistry student, dental technician) and the information content (high, medium, poor quality). Group comparisons were analysed using the Kruskal Wallis H and post-hoc Tamhane’s T2 test. RESULTS: 20 relevant videos were classified as 55% high(GQS 4.7±0.6), 35% medium(GQS 3.3±1.6), and 10% considered poor quality(GQS 1.0±0). Evaluated according to their quality, no significant difference was found between the parameters except GQS(p=0.013). The videos are as follows, in order of their sources: dentists(n=6,30%), dentistry students(n=11,55%) and dental technicians(n=3,15%). CONCLUSION: The fact that there was no difference in the viewing and popularity of useful and misleading videos revealed that the high quality video could not be chosen by the video viewers. In this study, it was concluded that dentistry students should pay particular attention to the video provider while providing video access to support their preclinical education. Health academics and health institutions need to increase studies on 'pre-clinical practice courses' and try to raise awareness by uploading more useful and systematic videos to the internet/YouTube.
与上颌中切牙操作相关的优酷视频内容分析
背景:如今,Youtube 等互联网视频共享平台已成为许多领域(如健康领域)的重要信息来源。本调查的目的是评估牙科学生在一年级临床前教育中使用的与 "上颌中央切牙操作 "相关的 Youtube 视频内容的适用性、实用性和质量。 材料与方法:采用由 10 个参数组成的评分系统来评估视频内容的质量。由两名牙科医生根据上传者(牙科医生、牙科学生、牙科技师)和信息内容(高质量、中等质量、低质量),记录观看人数、点赞数、评论数、信息可靠性、总体质量得分(GQS)和视频持续时间等参数进行评估。采用 Kruskal Wallis H 和 Tamhane's T2 检验进行分组比较分析。 结果:20 个相关视频中,55% 为高质量(GQS 4.7±0.6),35% 为中等质量(GQS 3.3±1.6),10% 为低质量(GQS 1.0±0)。根据质量进行评价,除 GQS 外,其他参数之间无显著差异(P=0.013)。这些视频按来源顺序排列如下:牙科医生(n=6,30%)、牙科学生(n=11,55%)和牙科技师(n=3,15%)。 结论:有用视频和误导性视频的观看率和受欢迎程度没有差异这一事实表明,高质量的视频无法被视频观看者选择。本研究的结论是,口腔医学学生在提供视频访问以支持其临床前教育时,应特别关注视频提供者。卫生学术界和卫生机构需要加强对 "临床前实践课程 "的研究,并尝试通过在互联网/YouTube 上上传更多有用和系统的视频来提高认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信