Automatic detection of fake news using recurrent neural network—Long short-term memory

Anil Kumari Shalini, Sameer Saxena, B. Suresh Kumar
{"title":"Automatic detection of fake news using recurrent neural network—Long short-term memory","authors":"Anil Kumari Shalini, Sameer Saxena, B. Suresh Kumar","doi":"10.32629/jai.v7i3.798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The propagation of deliberate misinformation is gaining significant momentum, especially across different social media platforms. Despite the fact that there are several fact-checking blogs and websites that distinguish between news that is genuine or fake, and regardless of the reality that there is ongoing research being conducted to restrict the propagation of fake news, the issue is still one that needs to be addressed. The most major barrier is a failure to spot monitors and to disclose false news in a reasonable timeframe, both of which are critical components. In this research, a system is proposed that utilizes deep learning model of Recurrent Neural Network—Long Short-Term Memory (RNN-LSTM) in order to put an end to the circulation of misleading information and put a stop to, and expose instances of fake news that are spread through reliable channels. The process of extracting hybrid features from text data, such as Lemmas, Bi-Gram, Tri-Gram, N-gram, Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), part-of-speech, and dependency-based natural language processing features, is developed as a strategy. When compared to other traditional approaches to machine learning classifier, the RNN-LSTM method that was proposed obtains a greater level of accuracy than those other approaches. It achieves an accuracy rate of 99.10% both during training and testing, which is better to the accuracy achieved by common machine learning approaches such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Decision Tree (DT). In the proposed approach for detecting false news using RNN-LSTM, the three experiments are conducted to acquire, accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score with varying forms of cross validation (5-Fold, 10-Fold and 15-Fold). Based on the findings of the empirical research, the conclusion can be drawn that the RNN-LSTM with ReLu function provides more accurate detection than both the RNN-LSTM (Tan h) function and the RNN-LSTM (sigmoid) function with 15 fold cross validation.","PeriodicalId":307060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","volume":"39 154","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i3.798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The propagation of deliberate misinformation is gaining significant momentum, especially across different social media platforms. Despite the fact that there are several fact-checking blogs and websites that distinguish between news that is genuine or fake, and regardless of the reality that there is ongoing research being conducted to restrict the propagation of fake news, the issue is still one that needs to be addressed. The most major barrier is a failure to spot monitors and to disclose false news in a reasonable timeframe, both of which are critical components. In this research, a system is proposed that utilizes deep learning model of Recurrent Neural Network—Long Short-Term Memory (RNN-LSTM) in order to put an end to the circulation of misleading information and put a stop to, and expose instances of fake news that are spread through reliable channels. The process of extracting hybrid features from text data, such as Lemmas, Bi-Gram, Tri-Gram, N-gram, Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), part-of-speech, and dependency-based natural language processing features, is developed as a strategy. When compared to other traditional approaches to machine learning classifier, the RNN-LSTM method that was proposed obtains a greater level of accuracy than those other approaches. It achieves an accuracy rate of 99.10% both during training and testing, which is better to the accuracy achieved by common machine learning approaches such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Decision Tree (DT). In the proposed approach for detecting false news using RNN-LSTM, the three experiments are conducted to acquire, accuracy, precision, recall, and F-score with varying forms of cross validation (5-Fold, 10-Fold and 15-Fold). Based on the findings of the empirical research, the conclusion can be drawn that the RNN-LSTM with ReLu function provides more accurate detection than both the RNN-LSTM (Tan h) function and the RNN-LSTM (sigmoid) function with 15 fold cross validation.
利用递归神经网络--长短期记忆自动检测假新闻
蓄意传播虚假信息的势头越来越大,尤其是在不同的社交媒体平台上。尽管有一些事实核查博客和网站可以区分新闻的真假,尽管目前正在开展研究以限制假新闻的传播,但这一问题仍然亟待解决。最主要的障碍是无法发现监控者,也无法在合理的时间范围内披露虚假新闻,而这两者都是至关重要的组成部分。本研究提出了一种利用递归神经网络-长短期记忆(RNN-LSTM)深度学习模型的系统,以杜绝误导性信息的流通,制止并揭露通过可靠渠道传播的假新闻。从文本数据中提取混合特征的过程被发展为一种策略,如词法、双词法、三词法、N-词法、词频反向文档频率(TF-IDF)、语音部分和基于依赖关系的自然语言处理特征。与其他传统的机器学习分类器方法相比,所提出的 RNN-LSTM 方法获得了更高的准确率。它在训练和测试过程中的准确率都达到了 99.10%,优于支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、奈夫贝叶斯(NB)和决策树(DT)等常见机器学习方法的准确率。在所提出的使用 RNN-LSTM 检测虚假新闻的方法中,通过不同形式的交叉验证(5-Fold、10-Fold 和 15-Fold),对准确率、精确度、召回率和 F 分数进行了三次实验。根据实证研究的结果,可以得出结论:使用 ReLu 函数的 RNN-LSTM 比使用 RNN-LSTM(Tan h)函数和 RNN-LSTM(sigmoid)函数的 RNN-LSTM(15 倍交叉验证)提供了更准确的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信