Investigating accountability of state subsidies for political parties

Chandra Puspita Kurniawati, Oktarika Ayoe Sandha, Sutthi Suntharanurak, Entang Adhy Muhtar, Ramadhan Pancasilawan
{"title":"Investigating accountability of state subsidies for political parties","authors":"Chandra Puspita Kurniawati, Oktarika Ayoe Sandha, Sutthi Suntharanurak, Entang Adhy Muhtar, Ramadhan Pancasilawan","doi":"10.28986/jtaken.v9i2.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulations stipulate that a political party must prepare financial reports to facilitate sound financial management and accountability of the state subsidies it receives. However, its accountability remains problematic, raising a question: How do the related policies deal with the accountability of state subsidies for political parties? This study aims to evaluate issues related to accountability in the policies governing the management of state subsidies for political parties. This study is normative legal research. Within a meta-analysis framework, critical analysis of the relevant policies in the form of laws and regulations and other reliable sources of information is carried out. The study finds that the policies provide rules to ensure eligible political parties’ right to obtain state subsidies and employ audit and administrative sanctions to enhance state subsidy accountability. Nevertheless, the policies still overlook important issues related to vertical accountability of political parties and government, horizontal accountability of government, internal control mechanisms, supervision requirements, and formal and material responsibilities by relevant in-charge parties. Moreover, the running audit practices do not provide much value for improvement. This study provides policy-makers with a new perspective on relevant studies so that the government will consider the comprehensive management of state subsidies for political parties by relevant in-charge parties before elevating the value of the subsidies.","PeriodicalId":31962,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v9i2.1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulations stipulate that a political party must prepare financial reports to facilitate sound financial management and accountability of the state subsidies it receives. However, its accountability remains problematic, raising a question: How do the related policies deal with the accountability of state subsidies for political parties? This study aims to evaluate issues related to accountability in the policies governing the management of state subsidies for political parties. This study is normative legal research. Within a meta-analysis framework, critical analysis of the relevant policies in the form of laws and regulations and other reliable sources of information is carried out. The study finds that the policies provide rules to ensure eligible political parties’ right to obtain state subsidies and employ audit and administrative sanctions to enhance state subsidy accountability. Nevertheless, the policies still overlook important issues related to vertical accountability of political parties and government, horizontal accountability of government, internal control mechanisms, supervision requirements, and formal and material responsibilities by relevant in-charge parties. Moreover, the running audit practices do not provide much value for improvement. This study provides policy-makers with a new perspective on relevant studies so that the government will consider the comprehensive management of state subsidies for political parties by relevant in-charge parties before elevating the value of the subsidies.
调查国家对政党补贴的问责情况
条例》规定,政党必须编制财务报告,以便对其获得的国家补贴进行合理的财务管理和问责。然而,其问责制仍然存在问题,这就提出了一个问题:相关政策如何处理政党国家补贴的问责问题?本研究旨在评估政党国家补贴管理政策中与问责制有关的问题。本研究属于规范性法律研究。在元分析框架内,对法律法规形式的相关政策和其他可靠信息来源进行了批判性分析。研究发现,这些政策规定了确保符合条件的政党获得国家补贴的权利,并采用审计和行政处罚来加强国家补贴的问责制。然而,这些政策仍然忽略了政党和政府的纵向问责、政府的横向问责、内部控制机制、监督要求以及相关负责人的形式责任和实质责任等重要问题。此外,运行中的审计实践也没有提供太多的改进价值。本研究为政策制定者提供了相关研究的新视角,使政府在提升政党补贴的价值之前,考虑相关负责人对政党国家补贴的综合管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信