Administrative Procedure in the Field of Public Health

Oleksandr Zyma
{"title":"Administrative Procedure in the Field of Public Health","authors":"Oleksandr Zyma","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.163.292605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the proposed study is due to the parallel significant update of medical legislation and the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine \"On Administrative Procedure\". The purpose of the proposed research is to assess the quality of legal regulation of certain administrative proceedings in the field of public health, which has undergone significant changes in the last months of 2023. The results of the study, on the one hand, will help to identify shortcomings and legal conflicts that have formed, and on the other hand, to develop and suggest ways to overcome some of them. The research methodology consists of the following methods of scientific cognition: dialectical, theoretical-prognostic, comparative-legal, system-structural, formal-logical, analysis, legal modeling, and others. In the course of the work, the importance of proper legal regulation and effective public administration in the field of public health is emphasized. The place of administrative bodies in the system has been establishedsubjects of relations in the field of public health. A classification of measures used by specialized administrative bodies in their activities has been proposed. The significance of administrative proceedings and administrative acts used in the process of public administration of public health is disclosed and the most significant among them are highlighted: control and supervision, on the application of termination measures, registration. The essence of each of these proceedings has been investigated and the shortcomings of their regulation have been identified, due to the inconsistency of the norms of the Laws of Ukraine \"On the Public Health System\" and \"On the Administrative Procedure\". Significant shortcomings in the legal regulation of administrative proceedings  on the application of temporary measures to stop violations of the requirements of sanitary legislation are noted and possible problems in its application are indicated. Attention is also focused on the shortcomings of the terminology used in the Law \"On the Public Health System\". The results of the study can contribute to the improvement of legislation in the field of public health, as well as to improve the quality of formation law enforcement practice of administrative bodies that are subjects of the public health system.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"268 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.163.292605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the proposed study is due to the parallel significant update of medical legislation and the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure". The purpose of the proposed research is to assess the quality of legal regulation of certain administrative proceedings in the field of public health, which has undergone significant changes in the last months of 2023. The results of the study, on the one hand, will help to identify shortcomings and legal conflicts that have formed, and on the other hand, to develop and suggest ways to overcome some of them. The research methodology consists of the following methods of scientific cognition: dialectical, theoretical-prognostic, comparative-legal, system-structural, formal-logical, analysis, legal modeling, and others. In the course of the work, the importance of proper legal regulation and effective public administration in the field of public health is emphasized. The place of administrative bodies in the system has been establishedsubjects of relations in the field of public health. A classification of measures used by specialized administrative bodies in their activities has been proposed. The significance of administrative proceedings and administrative acts used in the process of public administration of public health is disclosed and the most significant among them are highlighted: control and supervision, on the application of termination measures, registration. The essence of each of these proceedings has been investigated and the shortcomings of their regulation have been identified, due to the inconsistency of the norms of the Laws of Ukraine "On the Public Health System" and "On the Administrative Procedure". Significant shortcomings in the legal regulation of administrative proceedings  on the application of temporary measures to stop violations of the requirements of sanitary legislation are noted and possible problems in its application are indicated. Attention is also focused on the shortcomings of the terminology used in the Law "On the Public Health System". The results of the study can contribute to the improvement of legislation in the field of public health, as well as to improve the quality of formation law enforcement practice of administrative bodies that are subjects of the public health system.
公共卫生领域的行政程序
拟议研究的现实意义在于医疗立法的重大更新和《乌克兰行政诉讼法》的生效。建议研究的目的是评估公共卫生领域某些行政程序的法律监管质量,这些程序在 2023 年最后几个月发生了重大变化。研究结果一方面有助于发现不足之处和已形成的法律冲突,另一方面有助于制定和提出克服某些不足之处和法律冲突的方法。研究方法包括以下科学认知方法:辩证法、理论-预测法、比较-法律法、系统-结构法、形式-逻辑法、分析法、法律模型法等。在研究过程中,强调了公共卫生领域适当的法律规范和有效的公共管理的重要性。确定了行政机构在公共卫生领域关系主体体系中的地位。提出了专门行政机构在其活动中使用的措施分类。披露了公共卫生公共管理过程中使用的行政程序和行政行为的重要性,并强调了其中最重 要的程序和行为:控制和监督、终止措施的实施、登记。由于《乌克兰公共卫生体系法》和《乌克兰行政诉讼法》的规范不一致,对每个程序的本质进行了研究,并确定了其管理的缺陷。注意到关于采取临时措施制止违反卫生立法要求的行政程序的法律规定存在重大缺陷,并指出了在实施过程中可能出现的问题。公共卫生体系法》中使用的术语也存在缺陷。研究结果有助于完善公共卫生领域的立法,提高作为公共卫生系统主体的行政机构的执法实践质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信