Enhancing social skills: Reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of SSIS-RS among physical education students

Fegie Rizkia Mulyana, Adang Suherman, Agus Mahendra, Herman Subarjah, Yusuf Hidayat
{"title":"Enhancing social skills: Reliability and validity of the Indonesian version of SSIS-RS among physical education students","authors":"Fegie Rizkia Mulyana, Adang Suherman, Agus Mahendra, Herman Subarjah, Yusuf Hidayat","doi":"10.25299/sportarea.2024.vol9(1).13492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Problems: Social skills development is increasingly important in education as it impacts students’ social interactions, good relationships, and academic success. However, in the digital age, changing social dynamics are driving educators and researchers to recognise the importance of valid and reliable tools to assess and develop social skills, including in primary, secondary, and tertiary schools. Research Objectives: This study aims to discuss the process of adapting an instrument to assess adolescent social skill in higher education, highlighting the key considerations and steps involved in its development. Methods: The research method used was quantitative research. The population in this study were 1st semester physical education students, the sampling technique was purposive sampling, and the sample size was 118, data were discussed with Pearson and Cronbach. The English version of the SSIS-RS was translated according to international guidelines into Indonesian. Content validity was verified by an expert panel and our instrument was then administered to the two sample physical education classes. SPSS version 27.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used to perform all analyses in this study. Findings and Results: The results of the instrument validity test using Pearson correlation showed that 45 statement items were valid (r count > r table) of 46 statement items. It could be concluded that the Indonesian version of the SSIS-RS instrument had achieved adequate group validity. Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.888-0.893, indicating adequate internal consistency. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the SSIS-RS instrument was said to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing students' social skills in physical education learning, so that it becomes a reference instrument when measuring affective learning abilities. The importance of social skills possessed by students because it is a predictor of academic and future success.","PeriodicalId":503330,"journal":{"name":"Journal Sport Area","volume":"279 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Sport Area","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2024.vol9(1).13492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Problems: Social skills development is increasingly important in education as it impacts students’ social interactions, good relationships, and academic success. However, in the digital age, changing social dynamics are driving educators and researchers to recognise the importance of valid and reliable tools to assess and develop social skills, including in primary, secondary, and tertiary schools. Research Objectives: This study aims to discuss the process of adapting an instrument to assess adolescent social skill in higher education, highlighting the key considerations and steps involved in its development. Methods: The research method used was quantitative research. The population in this study were 1st semester physical education students, the sampling technique was purposive sampling, and the sample size was 118, data were discussed with Pearson and Cronbach. The English version of the SSIS-RS was translated according to international guidelines into Indonesian. Content validity was verified by an expert panel and our instrument was then administered to the two sample physical education classes. SPSS version 27.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used to perform all analyses in this study. Findings and Results: The results of the instrument validity test using Pearson correlation showed that 45 statement items were valid (r count > r table) of 46 statement items. It could be concluded that the Indonesian version of the SSIS-RS instrument had achieved adequate group validity. Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.888-0.893, indicating adequate internal consistency. Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the SSIS-RS instrument was said to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing students' social skills in physical education learning, so that it becomes a reference instrument when measuring affective learning abilities. The importance of social skills possessed by students because it is a predictor of academic and future success.
提高社交技能:印尼版 SSIS-RS 在体育教育专业学生中的信度和效度
背景问题:社交技能的培养在教育中越来越重要,因为它影响着学生的社会交往、良好的人际关系和学业成就。然而,在数字时代,不断变化的社会动态促使教育工作者和研究人员认识到有效可靠的工具对于评估和发展社交技能的重要性,包括在小学、中学和大学。研究目标:本研究旨在讨论在高等教育中改编评估青少年社交技能的工具的过程,强调开发过程中的主要考虑因素和步骤。研究方法:采用的研究方法是定量研究。研究对象为体育教育专业第一学期的学生,抽样技术为目的性抽样,样本量为 118 个,数据经皮尔森和克朗巴赫讨论。根据国际准则将 SSIS-RS 的英文版翻译成印尼文。内容有效性由专家小组验证,然后在两个样本体育班级中使用了我们的工具。本研究使用 SPSS 27.0 版(SPSS Inc,芝加哥,伊利诺斯州)进行所有分析。研究结果与成果:使用皮尔逊相关法进行的工具有效性测试结果表明,在 46 个陈述项目中,有 45 个陈述项目是有效的(r 数大于 r 表)。由此可以得出结论,印尼版 SSIS-RS 工具具有充分的团体效度。Cronbach alpha 在 0.888-0.893 之间,表明内部一致性良好。结论印尼版 SSIS-RS 工具被认为是评估学生在体育学习中的社交技能的有效和可靠的工具,因此成为测量情感学习能力的参考工具。学生所拥有的社交技能非常重要,因为它是学业和未来成功的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信