Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes

R. Myroniuk, Stanislava Myroniuk
{"title":"Сoncept, Content and Types of Procedures for Pre-Court Settlement of Administrative and Legal Disputes","authors":"R. Myroniuk, Stanislava Myroniuk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.163.291781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topicality of the topic is due to the study of various forms and procedures of pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes as alternatives to the judicial procedure for consideration of this category of disputes, which requires a much larger public resource. The purpose of the study is to carry out a scientific analysis of the legal nature of pre-trial procedures for resolving public-law disputes, their types, as well as substantiating proposals for their improvement. The tasks of the research are to carry out a theoretical-legal analysis of the concept and content of \"administrative procedures\", to define the concept of \"procedures for pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes\", to clarify its content and types. Achieving the outlined goal and fulfilling the set tasks became possible thanks to the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular the dialectical method, the use of which made it possible to comprehensively reveal the nature of \"administrative procedure\" as a form of pre-trial settlement of an administrative-legal dispute, as well as to trace the genesis of this phenomenon; the formal legal method was used to establish the content of legal norms and analyze the practice of their application by courts. As a result of the study, it was established that the procedure for pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes should be understood as a legally defined sequence of actions of a subject of authority or another authorized person aimed at taking measures to resolve an administrative-legal dispute out of court. The following alternative procedural forms of pre-trial and out-of-court settlement of administrative-legal disputes are singled out: 1) administrative procedure for consideration of complaints against decisions, actions or inaction of subjects of authority, in accordance with the Law of Ukraine \"On Appeals of Citizens\"; 2) the procedure for appealing an administrative act of a subject of authority, in accordance with the Law of Ukraine \"On Administrative Procedure\"; 3) mediation – an out-of-court procedure for the settlement of a public-law conflict (dispute), which is carried out with the help (mediation) of a mediator; 4) reaching a tax compromise when resolving tax disputes, in accordance with the Tax Code of Ukraine; 5) the procedure for administrative appeal of decisions in cases of administrative offenses, in accordance with the procedure specified by the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Customs Code of Ukraine. It has been proven that the most complete content of this procedure is defined in the Law of Ukraine \"On Administrative Procedure\", which gives reasons to distinguish the following stages of it: initiation of administrative proceedings (complaint and decision, action or inaction of the subject of authority) and filing of such a complaint directly to the entity authorized to consider it or through the Centers for the provision of administrative services; accepting, registering a complaint and opening proceedings for its consideration; investigation of the circumstances of the case and collection of evidence; consideration and resolution of the case; making a decision in a case in the form of an administrative act; bringing the administrative act to the attention of the applicant; ensuring the implementation of the adopted act. Proposals to improve the norms of the Law of Ukraine \"On Mediation\", which regulate the procedure for out-of-court settlement of public-law disputes by defining and meaningfully filling the stages of such a procedure, are substantiated.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"340 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.163.291781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topicality of the topic is due to the study of various forms and procedures of pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes as alternatives to the judicial procedure for consideration of this category of disputes, which requires a much larger public resource. The purpose of the study is to carry out a scientific analysis of the legal nature of pre-trial procedures for resolving public-law disputes, their types, as well as substantiating proposals for their improvement. The tasks of the research are to carry out a theoretical-legal analysis of the concept and content of "administrative procedures", to define the concept of "procedures for pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes", to clarify its content and types. Achieving the outlined goal and fulfilling the set tasks became possible thanks to the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular the dialectical method, the use of which made it possible to comprehensively reveal the nature of "administrative procedure" as a form of pre-trial settlement of an administrative-legal dispute, as well as to trace the genesis of this phenomenon; the formal legal method was used to establish the content of legal norms and analyze the practice of their application by courts. As a result of the study, it was established that the procedure for pre-trial settlement of administrative-legal disputes should be understood as a legally defined sequence of actions of a subject of authority or another authorized person aimed at taking measures to resolve an administrative-legal dispute out of court. The following alternative procedural forms of pre-trial and out-of-court settlement of administrative-legal disputes are singled out: 1) administrative procedure for consideration of complaints against decisions, actions or inaction of subjects of authority, in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Appeals of Citizens"; 2) the procedure for appealing an administrative act of a subject of authority, in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure"; 3) mediation – an out-of-court procedure for the settlement of a public-law conflict (dispute), which is carried out with the help (mediation) of a mediator; 4) reaching a tax compromise when resolving tax disputes, in accordance with the Tax Code of Ukraine; 5) the procedure for administrative appeal of decisions in cases of administrative offenses, in accordance with the procedure specified by the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Customs Code of Ukraine. It has been proven that the most complete content of this procedure is defined in the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure", which gives reasons to distinguish the following stages of it: initiation of administrative proceedings (complaint and decision, action or inaction of the subject of authority) and filing of such a complaint directly to the entity authorized to consider it or through the Centers for the provision of administrative services; accepting, registering a complaint and opening proceedings for its consideration; investigation of the circumstances of the case and collection of evidence; consideration and resolution of the case; making a decision in a case in the form of an administrative act; bringing the administrative act to the attention of the applicant; ensuring the implementation of the adopted act. Proposals to improve the norms of the Law of Ukraine "On Mediation", which regulate the procedure for out-of-court settlement of public-law disputes by defining and meaningfully filling the stages of such a procedure, are substantiated.
行政和法律纠纷庭前解决程序的概念、内容和类型
本专题之所以具有现实意义,是因为研究了行政法律纠纷审前解决的各种形式和程序,以替代司法程序来审理这类纠纷,而司法程序需要更多的公共资源。本研究的目的是对解决公法争议的审前程序的法律性质、类型进行科学分析,并提出改进建议。研究的任务是对 "行政程序 "的概念和内容进行理论-法律分析,界定 "行政法律争议审前解决程序 "的概念,明确其内容和类型。由于使用了科学知识的综合方法,特别是辩证法,从而有可能全面揭示 "行政程序 "作为一种审前解决行政法律纠纷的形式的性质,并追溯这一现象的起源;还使用了形式法律方法来确定法律规范的内容并分析法院适用这些规范的实践。研究结果表明,行政法律纠纷的审前解决程序应被理解为权力主体或其他被授权人为采取庭外解决行政法律纠纷的措施而依法采取的一系列行动。以下是行政法律争议的审前和庭外解决的替代程序形式:1) 根据乌克兰《公民上诉法》审议对权力主体的决定、行为或不行为的投诉的行政程序;2) 根据乌克兰《行政程序法》对权力主体的行政行为提出上诉的程序;3) 调解--在调解员的帮助(调解)下解决公法冲突(争端)的庭外程序;4) 根据《乌克兰税法》在解决税务争端时达成税务妥协;5) 根据《乌克兰行政违法法典》和《乌克兰海关法典》规定的程序对行政违法案件中的决定提出行政上诉的程序。事实证明,乌克兰《行政程序法》规定了该程序最完整的内容,该法为区分该程序的以下阶段提供了理由:关于完善《乌克兰调解法》规范的建议得到了证实,该法通过界定和有意义地充实公法争端的庭外解决程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信