Evolution of stress testing of financial institutions

V. Kuznetsova, O. Larina
{"title":"Evolution of stress testing of financial institutions","authors":"V. Kuznetsova, O. Larina","doi":"10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-4-45-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the issues of developing a relevant tool for financial regulation and supervision – stress testing. Regulatory authorities use different types of testing to assess possible problems, as well as to model the response of supervised institutions to changes in system parameters. At present, the issues of ensuring financial stability are quite acute, and the search for effective analytical tools is an important managerial task, the solution of which is the focus of this study. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the advantages and limitations of this tool and to identify areas for its improvement. The evolution of the tool has been analyzed, and microprudential, macroprudential, and crisis stress tests investigated. The work is based on the data of the International Monetary Fund, as well as the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the methods of analyzing regulatory documents and comparative economic analysis have been used. Types of stress tests and main stages of stress testing have been systematized. The authors, considering cross-border nature of financial institutions’ activities, conclude that transformation of supervisory tools is desirable and recommend the inclusion of non-banking financial organizations in stress testing, as well as network interactions between financial institutions as the main areas of improvement.","PeriodicalId":150451,"journal":{"name":"UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)","volume":"32 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UPRAVLENIE / MANAGEMENT (Russia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-4-45-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article raises the issues of developing a relevant tool for financial regulation and supervision – stress testing. Regulatory authorities use different types of testing to assess possible problems, as well as to model the response of supervised institutions to changes in system parameters. At present, the issues of ensuring financial stability are quite acute, and the search for effective analytical tools is an important managerial task, the solution of which is the focus of this study. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the advantages and limitations of this tool and to identify areas for its improvement. The evolution of the tool has been analyzed, and microprudential, macroprudential, and crisis stress tests investigated. The work is based on the data of the International Monetary Fund, as well as the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the methods of analyzing regulatory documents and comparative economic analysis have been used. Types of stress tests and main stages of stress testing have been systematized. The authors, considering cross-border nature of financial institutions’ activities, conclude that transformation of supervisory tools is desirable and recommend the inclusion of non-banking financial organizations in stress testing, as well as network interactions between financial institutions as the main areas of improvement.
金融机构压力测试的演变
文章提出了开发金融监管和监督的相关工具--压力测试的问题。监管机构使用不同类型的测试来评估可能出现的问题,并模拟受监管机构对系统参数变化的反应。目前,确保金融稳定的问题相当尖锐,寻找有效的分析工具是一项重要的管理任务,而解决这一问题正是本研究的重点。本文的目的是证实该工具的优势和局限性,并确定其改进的领域。文章分析了该工具的演变过程,并对微观审慎、宏观审慎和危机压力测试进行了调查。这项工作以国际货币基金组织和俄罗斯联邦中央银行的数据为基础,采用了分析监管文件和比较经济分析的方法。压力测试的类型和主要阶段已经系统化。考虑到金融机构活动的跨境性质,作者得出结论认为,监管工具的转变是可取的,并建议将非银行金融组织纳入压力测试,以及将金融机构之间的网络互动作为主要改进领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信