Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Is Associated with Fewer Acute Adverse Skin Reactions Without Increased Risk of Postoperative Wound Complications in High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma - A Retrospective Comparative Study with A Mean Follow-Up of 7 Years

Hiu Woo Lau
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Is Associated with Fewer Acute Adverse Skin Reactions Without Increased Risk of Postoperative Wound Complications in High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma - A Retrospective Comparative Study with A Mean Follow-Up of 7 Years","authors":"Hiu Woo Lau","doi":"10.46889/josr.2023.4311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study, we aim to compare the adverse effects and oncological outcomes of patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant RT. Methods: From 2008 to 2022, Sixty-four patients underwent limb-preserving surgery in our institute for localized high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma were included. Thirty-nine patients received adjuvant radiotherapy while twenty-five patients received neoadjuvant RT before surgery if the soft tissue sarcomas were close to the neurovascular bundles, bones or histological types of myxoid liposarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma. Primary outcomes were acute RT-related skin adverse reactions and significant side effects comprising postoperative wound complications, pathological fractures and RT-induced sarcoma. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin quality, Local-Recurrence (LR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survivorship. Results and Discussion: Patients in the neoadjuvant RT group had significantly fewer acute RT-induced adverse skin reactions than the adjuvant RT group (p=0.044, Table 2). None in the neoadjuvant RT group suffered severe acute skin reaction (RTOG grade 3-4). Wound infection (n=2) and pathological fracture (n=1) were rare in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant RT groups (P=0.640 & 1.000 respectively). Survival curves for local-recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survivorship of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier Curve. All results are statistically insignificant, with p=0.835, 0.948 and 0.540, respectively. Presence of metastasis was the only statistically significant predictor of the overall survival-adjusted hazard ratio of 8.7 (95%CI 2.7-28), p<0.001. Conclusion: Patients with neoadjuvant RT had lower cumulative radiation doses and fewer acute adverse skin reactions. There was no increased risk of postoperative wound complication compared to adjuvant RT. The LR-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were comparable in both groups. Our results suggested that postponing surgery to eight weeks after neoadjuvant RT and primary wound closure were associated with fewer wound complications, but further studies were warranted.","PeriodicalId":382112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","volume":"15 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/josr.2023.4311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aim to compare the adverse effects and oncological outcomes of patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant RT. Methods: From 2008 to 2022, Sixty-four patients underwent limb-preserving surgery in our institute for localized high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma were included. Thirty-nine patients received adjuvant radiotherapy while twenty-five patients received neoadjuvant RT before surgery if the soft tissue sarcomas were close to the neurovascular bundles, bones or histological types of myxoid liposarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma. Primary outcomes were acute RT-related skin adverse reactions and significant side effects comprising postoperative wound complications, pathological fractures and RT-induced sarcoma. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin quality, Local-Recurrence (LR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survivorship. Results and Discussion: Patients in the neoadjuvant RT group had significantly fewer acute RT-induced adverse skin reactions than the adjuvant RT group (p=0.044, Table 2). None in the neoadjuvant RT group suffered severe acute skin reaction (RTOG grade 3-4). Wound infection (n=2) and pathological fracture (n=1) were rare in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant RT groups (P=0.640 & 1.000 respectively). Survival curves for local-recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survivorship of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier Curve. All results are statistically insignificant, with p=0.835, 0.948 and 0.540, respectively. Presence of metastasis was the only statistically significant predictor of the overall survival-adjusted hazard ratio of 8.7 (95%CI 2.7-28), p<0.001. Conclusion: Patients with neoadjuvant RT had lower cumulative radiation doses and fewer acute adverse skin reactions. There was no increased risk of postoperative wound complication compared to adjuvant RT. The LR-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were comparable in both groups. Our results suggested that postponing surgery to eight weeks after neoadjuvant RT and primary wound closure were associated with fewer wound complications, but further studies were warranted.
新辅助放疗与较少的急性皮肤不良反应有关,但不会增加高级别四肢软组织肉瘤术后伤口并发症的风险--一项平均随访 7 年的回顾性比较研究
目的:本研究旨在比较接受新辅助或辅助 RT 治疗的高级别四肢软组织肉瘤患者的不良反应和肿瘤预后。 研究方法2008年至2022年,我院64例局部高级别四肢软组织肉瘤患者接受了保肢手术。39例患者接受了辅助放疗,25例患者在手术前接受了新辅助RT治疗,前提是软组织肉瘤靠近神经血管束、骨骼或组织学类型为肌样脂肪肉瘤或横纹肌肉瘤。主要结果是急性 RT 相关皮肤不良反应和重大副作用,包括术后伤口并发症、病理性骨折和 RT 引发的肉瘤。次要结果包括手术边缘质量、无局部复发(LR)生存率、无转移生存率和总生存率。 结果与讨论:新辅助 RT 组患者的急性 RT 引起的皮肤不良反应明显少于辅助 RT 组(P=0.044,表 2)。新辅助RT组无严重急性皮肤反应(RTOG 3-4级)。伤口感染(n=2)和病理骨折(n=1)在辅助和新辅助RT组中都很罕见(P分别=0.640和1.000)。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析了新辅助组和辅助组的无局部复发生存率、无转移生存率和总生存率曲线。所有结果均无统计学意义,P分别为0.835、0.948和0.540。转移是唯一具有统计学意义的预测因素,调整后的总生存期危险比为 8.7(95%CI 2.7-28),P<0.001。 结论接受新辅助 RT 治疗的患者累积放射剂量较低,急性皮肤不良反应较少。与辅助 RT 相比,术后伤口并发症的风险没有增加。两组患者的无LR生存率、无转移生存率和总生存率相当。我们的研究结果表明,将手术时间推迟到新辅助RT术后八周并进行初次伤口缝合可减少伤口并发症,但仍需进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信