Discretionary Powers in the Context of Legal Regulation of Administrative Procedure

Dmytro Luk’yanets
{"title":"Discretionary Powers in the Context of Legal Regulation of Administrative Procedure","authors":"Dmytro Luk’yanets","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.163.292134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem consideration of determining the content and characteristics of discretionary powers in the context of the administrative procedure legal regulation, which is caused by the adoption and necessity of introducing the provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure» into the practices of the subjects of authority. The actuality of the topic is determined by the necessity to qualify administrative bodies' powers as discretionary and implement the relevant principles of administrative procedure. The article aims to analyze the normative constructions of administrative proceedings available in Ukraine's legislation, which allow for the possibility of exercising discretionary or similar powers to develop a position regarding the limits and features of the practical application of norms of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Achieving the outlined objective became possible through complex scientific knowledge methods, in particular dialectical and systemic approaches, formal-legal and comparative methods, and methods of analysis and synthesis. It is noted that the vast majority of normatively defined principles of administrative procedure are designed for the implementation of discretionary powers by administrative bodies. It was emphasized that an integral component of discretionary powers, in addition to the availability of legally defined options for decisions that an administrative body can adopt in the presence of specific grounds, is the availability of the administrative body's right to act at its discretion. Based on the conducted research on the content of the administrative bodies' powers in specific types of administrative proceedings, the conclusions were formulated that in administrative proceedings of a registration and permitting nature, the relevant administrative bodies do not have discretionary powers. It is noted that an example of full-fledged discretionary powers is the powers of administrative bodies in tort proceedings. This is due to the fact that sanctions for the commission of relevant offenses have a relatively defined nature. In such cases, the administrative body, at its discretion, selects the type and amount of sanctions, taking into account the circumstances of the case. Unlimited discretion is inherent in the authority of collegial bodies, particularly local self-government bodies, which is determined by the decision-making method by voting of the collegial body members.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"52 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.163.292134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem consideration of determining the content and characteristics of discretionary powers in the context of the administrative procedure legal regulation, which is caused by the adoption and necessity of introducing the provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure» into the practices of the subjects of authority. The actuality of the topic is determined by the necessity to qualify administrative bodies' powers as discretionary and implement the relevant principles of administrative procedure. The article aims to analyze the normative constructions of administrative proceedings available in Ukraine's legislation, which allow for the possibility of exercising discretionary or similar powers to develop a position regarding the limits and features of the practical application of norms of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Achieving the outlined objective became possible through complex scientific knowledge methods, in particular dialectical and systemic approaches, formal-legal and comparative methods, and methods of analysis and synthesis. It is noted that the vast majority of normatively defined principles of administrative procedure are designed for the implementation of discretionary powers by administrative bodies. It was emphasized that an integral component of discretionary powers, in addition to the availability of legally defined options for decisions that an administrative body can adopt in the presence of specific grounds, is the availability of the administrative body's right to act at its discretion. Based on the conducted research on the content of the administrative bodies' powers in specific types of administrative proceedings, the conclusions were formulated that in administrative proceedings of a registration and permitting nature, the relevant administrative bodies do not have discretionary powers. It is noted that an example of full-fledged discretionary powers is the powers of administrative bodies in tort proceedings. This is due to the fact that sanctions for the commission of relevant offenses have a relatively defined nature. In such cases, the administrative body, at its discretion, selects the type and amount of sanctions, taking into account the circumstances of the case. Unlimited discretion is inherent in the authority of collegial bodies, particularly local self-government bodies, which is determined by the decision-making method by voting of the collegial body members.
行政程序法律规范中的自由裁量权
将行政机构的权力定性为自由裁量权并执行行政程序相关原则的必要性决定了该主题的现实性。通过复杂的科学知识方法,特别是辩证和系统方法、形式法律和比较方法以及分析和综合方法,实现上述目标成为可能。需要指出的是,绝大多数规范性行政程序原则都是为行政机构行使自由裁量权而设计的。需要强调的是,自由裁量权的一个组成部分,除了行政机构在有具体理由的情况下可 以通过的法律规定的决定选项之外,还包括行政机构的自由裁量权。根据对行政机构在特定类型的行政程序中的权力内容进行的研究,得出的结论是,在登记和 许可性质的行政程序中,相关行政机构没有自由裁量权。值得注意的是,行政机构在侵权诉讼中的权力是完全自由裁量权的一个例子。这是因为对相关违法行为的制裁具有相对明确的性质。在这种情况下,行政机构会根据案件的具体情况酌情选择制裁的类型和金额。无限裁量权是合议机构,特别是地方自治机构的固有权力,由合议机构成员投票决定的决策方法决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信