Outcome of Endovascular Procedure in Chronic Limb Ischemia Femoropopliteal Lesion: A Literature Review

{"title":"Outcome of Endovascular Procedure in Chronic Limb Ischemia Femoropopliteal Lesion: A Literature Review","authors":"","doi":"10.7454/nrjs.v8i3.1151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Angioplasty and stenting are the two main endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia. To summarize the research in this area, this article examines the state of these treatments today, diving into clinical subtleties and new trends. The objectives was to thoroughly analyze the body of research, combining knowledge about the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting. Methods: Literature was searched in some databases (Cochrane, PubMed, and EBSCO) from June to July 2021. Results: Five articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. There were two randomized control trials and three cohort studies. There was no difference in primary patency of balloon angioplasty and nitinol stenting on follow-up for five years. Amputation-free survival rates in the coated balloon and plain balloon groups were not different. Revascularization was also not significantly different in both groups. There was no complication reported in either group. Mortality rates in both groups were also not different after follow-up in 30 days. Conclusions: There were no notable variations in the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia.","PeriodicalId":360019,"journal":{"name":"The New Ropanasury Journal of Surgery","volume":"56 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Ropanasury Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/nrjs.v8i3.1151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Angioplasty and stenting are the two main endovascular treatments for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia. To summarize the research in this area, this article examines the state of these treatments today, diving into clinical subtleties and new trends. The objectives was to thoroughly analyze the body of research, combining knowledge about the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting. Methods: Literature was searched in some databases (Cochrane, PubMed, and EBSCO) from June to July 2021. Results: Five articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified. There were two randomized control trials and three cohort studies. There was no difference in primary patency of balloon angioplasty and nitinol stenting on follow-up for five years. Amputation-free survival rates in the coated balloon and plain balloon groups were not different. Revascularization was also not significantly different in both groups. There was no complication reported in either group. Mortality rates in both groups were also not different after follow-up in 30 days. Conclusions: There were no notable variations in the results of endovascular angioplasty and stenting for femoropopliteal lesions associated with chronic limb ischemia.
慢性肢体缺血股骨头病变的血管内手术效果:文献综述
导言。血管成形术和支架植入术是治疗与慢性肢体缺血相关的股骨头病变的两种主要血管内治疗方法。为了总结该领域的研究,本文探讨了这些治疗方法的现状,并深入研究了临床的微妙之处和新趋势。其目的是全面分析研究成果,将有关血管内成形术和支架植入术结果的知识结合起来。研究方法从 2021 年 6 月到 7 月,在一些数据库(Cochrane、PubMed 和 EBSCO)中搜索文献。结果共发现五篇符合纳入和排除标准的文章。其中有两项随机对照试验和三项队列研究。在为期五年的随访中,球囊血管成形术和镍钛诺支架植入术的初次通畅率没有差异。涂层球囊组和普通球囊组的无截肢存活率没有差异。两组的血管再通率也无明显差异。两组均未报告并发症。随访 30 天后,两组的死亡率也没有差异。结论:对伴有慢性肢体缺血的股骨头病变进行血管内成形术和支架植入术的结果没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信