Workability and Compressive Strength Properties of (Fly Ash-Metakaolin) based Flowable Geopolymer Mortar

Layth A. Al-Jaberi, Asmaa Ali, R. Al-Jadiri, Zainab Al-khafaji
{"title":"Workability and Compressive Strength Properties of (Fly Ash-Metakaolin) based Flowable Geopolymer Mortar","authors":"Layth A. Al-Jaberi, Asmaa Ali, R. Al-Jadiri, Zainab Al-khafaji","doi":"10.56748/ejse.23436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RPC (Reactive Powder Concrete) is a high-strength concrete with outstanding technical qualities. One of the most crucial critical criteria in RPC development is the cement content. Cement production is seen as an environmentally unsustainable process. As a result, it is necessary to substitute cement in RPC manufacturing with an environmentally acceptable binder. Geopolymer seems to be a novel binder that can completely replace cement. The properties of constituents and their percentages in the mix significantly affect the behavior of geopolymer concrete or mortar. This research aims to produce Geopolymer RPC (GRPC) and verify the impact of the ratios of fly ash/pozzolanic materials (FA/P), sand/pozzolanic materials(S/P), finer sand/fine aggregate (S2/S1), and alkaline solution/pozzolanic materials (A/P) on its mechanical and durability properties. The results of the current works demonstrate that increase in alkaline solution to binder ratio increase the compressive strength of the mortars from 62.28 to 70.01 MPa at 62.50% to 100% alkaline/binder ratio, respectively. As well as, vfor the same alkaline/binder ratio the workability subsequently improves from 15 to 17.3mm.","PeriodicalId":502439,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.23436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RPC (Reactive Powder Concrete) is a high-strength concrete with outstanding technical qualities. One of the most crucial critical criteria in RPC development is the cement content. Cement production is seen as an environmentally unsustainable process. As a result, it is necessary to substitute cement in RPC manufacturing with an environmentally acceptable binder. Geopolymer seems to be a novel binder that can completely replace cement. The properties of constituents and their percentages in the mix significantly affect the behavior of geopolymer concrete or mortar. This research aims to produce Geopolymer RPC (GRPC) and verify the impact of the ratios of fly ash/pozzolanic materials (FA/P), sand/pozzolanic materials(S/P), finer sand/fine aggregate (S2/S1), and alkaline solution/pozzolanic materials (A/P) on its mechanical and durability properties. The results of the current works demonstrate that increase in alkaline solution to binder ratio increase the compressive strength of the mortars from 62.28 to 70.01 MPa at 62.50% to 100% alkaline/binder ratio, respectively. As well as, vfor the same alkaline/binder ratio the workability subsequently improves from 15 to 17.3mm.
基于(粉煤灰-高岭土)的可流动土工聚合物砂浆的施工性和抗压强度特性
RPC (活性粉末混凝土)是一种高强度混凝土,具有出色的技术品质。RPC 开发中最重要的关键标准之一是水泥含量。水泥生产被视为对环境不可持续的过程。因此,有必要在 RPC 生产中使用环境可接受的粘合剂来替代水泥。土工聚合物似乎是一种可以完全替代水泥的新型粘合剂。成分的特性及其在混合料中的比例会对土工聚合物混凝土或砂浆的性能产生重大影响。本研究旨在生产土工聚合物 RPC(GRPC),并验证粉煤灰/胶凝材料(FA/P)、砂/胶凝材料(S/P)、细砂/细骨料(S2/S1)和碱溶液/胶凝材料(A/P)的比例对其机械和耐久性能的影响。目前的研究结果表明,增加碱溶液与粘结剂的比例可提高砂浆的抗压强度,在碱/粘结剂比例为 62.50%至 100%时,抗压强度分别为 62.28 至 70.01 兆帕。此外,在相同的碱液/粘结剂比率下,可操作性也从 15 毫米提高到 17.3 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信