Life cycle assessment of selected ammonia production technologies from the perspective of ammonia as a fuel for heavy-duty vehicle

Mateusz Proniewicz, Karolina Petela, Andrzej Szlek, Wojciech Adamczyk
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of selected ammonia production technologies from the perspective of ammonia as a fuel for heavy-duty vehicle","authors":"Mateusz Proniewicz, Karolina Petela, Andrzej Szlek, Wojciech Adamczyk","doi":"10.1115/1.4064371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the promising options towards decarbonization of industry dependent on heavy-duty vehicles is to use alternative fuels such as ammonia. The study investigates the environmental impact of five selected ammonia production technologies, and collates it with the diesel fuel: ammonia based on hydrogen from steam methane reforming (grey), ammonia based on steam methane reforming with carbon capture and storage (blue), ammonia based on hydrogen from electrolysis with electrical energy supplied by: PV (green PV), wind (green wind) and nuclear plant (pink). Environmental impact is assessed using ReCiPE method based on three midpoint and two endpoint categories: climate change, fossil depletion, freshwater consumption, human health and ecosystem quality. The results for climate change are: grey ammonia 0.148 kg CO2 eq., blue ammonia 0.0701 kg CO2 eq., green ammonia PV 0.0197 kg CO2 eq., green ammonia wind 0.01039 kg CO2 eq., pink ammonia 0.00565 kg CO2 eq., diesel incl. its stoichiometric combustion 0.0851 kg CO2 eq. LCA for Experts (GaBi) software was used to perform the LCA with Sphera's comprehensive Managed LCA Content as the primary choice of data for the life cycle inventory. The study indicates nuclear and renewable based routes to be the best options in terms of the climate change and human health categories, however their high impact on freshwater consumption and ecosystem quality is revealed. Still, ammonia is proven to be an effective solution towards decarbonization, as compared to diesel, given its blue, green or pink source.","PeriodicalId":509700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology","volume":"3 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Resources Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the promising options towards decarbonization of industry dependent on heavy-duty vehicles is to use alternative fuels such as ammonia. The study investigates the environmental impact of five selected ammonia production technologies, and collates it with the diesel fuel: ammonia based on hydrogen from steam methane reforming (grey), ammonia based on steam methane reforming with carbon capture and storage (blue), ammonia based on hydrogen from electrolysis with electrical energy supplied by: PV (green PV), wind (green wind) and nuclear plant (pink). Environmental impact is assessed using ReCiPE method based on three midpoint and two endpoint categories: climate change, fossil depletion, freshwater consumption, human health and ecosystem quality. The results for climate change are: grey ammonia 0.148 kg CO2 eq., blue ammonia 0.0701 kg CO2 eq., green ammonia PV 0.0197 kg CO2 eq., green ammonia wind 0.01039 kg CO2 eq., pink ammonia 0.00565 kg CO2 eq., diesel incl. its stoichiometric combustion 0.0851 kg CO2 eq. LCA for Experts (GaBi) software was used to perform the LCA with Sphera's comprehensive Managed LCA Content as the primary choice of data for the life cycle inventory. The study indicates nuclear and renewable based routes to be the best options in terms of the climate change and human health categories, however their high impact on freshwater consumption and ecosystem quality is revealed. Still, ammonia is proven to be an effective solution towards decarbonization, as compared to diesel, given its blue, green or pink source.
从氨作为重型车辆燃料的角度对选定的氨生产技术进行生命周期评估
使用替代燃料(如氨)是依赖重型车辆的工业实现脱碳的可行方案之一。本研究调查了五种选定的氨生产技术对环境的影响,并将其与柴油燃料进行对比:基于甲烷蒸汽转化氢的氨生产技术(灰色)、基于甲烷蒸汽转化和碳捕集与封存的氨生产技术(蓝色)、基于电解氢的氨生产技术(电解氢由光伏(绿色光伏)、风能(绿色风能)和核电厂(粉色核电)提供):光伏(绿色光伏)、风能(绿色风能)和核电厂(粉红色)。环境影响采用 ReCiPE 方法进行评估,基于三个中点和两个终点类别:气候变化、化石损耗、淡水消耗、人类健康和生态系统质量。气候变化方面的结果是:灰色氨气 0.148 千克二氧化碳当量,蓝色氨气 0.0701 千克二氧化碳当量,绿色氨气光伏 0.0197 千克二氧化碳当量,绿色氨气风力 0.01039 千克二氧化碳当量,粉色氨气 0.00565 千克二氧化碳当量,柴油(包括其化学燃烧) 0.0851 千克二氧化碳当量。专家生命周期评估(GaBi)软件用于执行生命周期评估,Sphera 的综合管理生命周期评估内容是生命周期清单数据的主要选择。研究表明,就气候变化和人类健康类别而言,核能和可再生路线是最佳选择,但它们对淡水消耗和生态系统质量的影响较大。不过,鉴于氨的蓝色、绿色或粉色来源,与柴油相比,氨被证明是去碳化的有效解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信