Legal Nature and Characteristics of Administrative Act (in the Comparative Context of Latvia and Ukraine)

J. Briede, Iryna Boiko
{"title":"Legal Nature and Characteristics of Administrative Act (in the Comparative Context of Latvia and Ukraine)","authors":"J. Briede, Iryna Boiko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.163.292172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topicality of the topic is due to the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine \"On Administrative Procedure\", which establishes unified rules for making decisions by the public administration, which are generally called administrative acts. The purpose of the article is to study the nature of administrative acts by highlighting their features, which will have not only theoretical, but also practical significance. The research uses methods of legal analysis and synthesis, comparative-legal, systemic-structural. It has been established that the external orientation of an administrative act means that the administrative body addresses its prescriptions to a person who is outside the public administration and does not have a labor or official relationship with it. It was established that the administrative act is a legal act, as it is based on the prescriptions of legislative acts; on this basis, it differs from actual actions. The difference between administrative and technical acts or simple acts in the field of public law is indicated. It was determined that the decision to refuse to meet the requirements of a person is a negative administrative act. It is emphasized that an administrative act is a decision in the field of public law; the theory of interests, the theory of subordination, and the theory of subjects were used to distinguish between public and private law. The subject of the adoption of an administrative act is the body performing the functions of public administration. It is noted that the functional approach embedded in his understanding allows him to consider both subjects of delegated powers, specially created commissions, and private individuals, if the legislator has empowered them to carry out public administration. It is emphasized that the legislator determines which acts are not administrative. On the basis of the conducted research, conclusions were formulated regarding the features of administrative acts, which include the following: external orientation, legal act, sphere of public law, adopted by the body, applies to an individually determined person or persons, establishes, changes or terminates legal relations or establishes the actual state, is not one from the decisions specified in the negative part of the definition of an administrative act or the adoption of which is not covered by the law. Recommendations are given regarding the use in practice of the features of an administrative act as criteria for determining the nature of the body's decision/action.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"26 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.163.292172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topicality of the topic is due to the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine "On Administrative Procedure", which establishes unified rules for making decisions by the public administration, which are generally called administrative acts. The purpose of the article is to study the nature of administrative acts by highlighting their features, which will have not only theoretical, but also practical significance. The research uses methods of legal analysis and synthesis, comparative-legal, systemic-structural. It has been established that the external orientation of an administrative act means that the administrative body addresses its prescriptions to a person who is outside the public administration and does not have a labor or official relationship with it. It was established that the administrative act is a legal act, as it is based on the prescriptions of legislative acts; on this basis, it differs from actual actions. The difference between administrative and technical acts or simple acts in the field of public law is indicated. It was determined that the decision to refuse to meet the requirements of a person is a negative administrative act. It is emphasized that an administrative act is a decision in the field of public law; the theory of interests, the theory of subordination, and the theory of subjects were used to distinguish between public and private law. The subject of the adoption of an administrative act is the body performing the functions of public administration. It is noted that the functional approach embedded in his understanding allows him to consider both subjects of delegated powers, specially created commissions, and private individuals, if the legislator has empowered them to carry out public administration. It is emphasized that the legislator determines which acts are not administrative. On the basis of the conducted research, conclusions were formulated regarding the features of administrative acts, which include the following: external orientation, legal act, sphere of public law, adopted by the body, applies to an individually determined person or persons, establishes, changes or terminates legal relations or establishes the actual state, is not one from the decisions specified in the negative part of the definition of an administrative act or the adoption of which is not covered by the law. Recommendations are given regarding the use in practice of the features of an administrative act as criteria for determining the nature of the body's decision/action.
行政法的法律性质和特点(在拉脱维亚和乌克兰的比较背景下)
本专题之所以具有现实意义,是因为《乌克兰行政程序法》已经生效,该法规定了公共行政部门做出决定的统一规则,这些决定通常被称为行政行为。本文旨在通过强调行政行为的特点来研究行政行为的性质,这不仅具有理论意义,还具有实际意义。研究采用了法律分析与综合、比较-法律、系统-结构等方法。现已确定,行政行为的外部取向是指行政机构将其规定的对象设定为公共行政机构之外的人,该人与公共行政机构不存在劳动关系或公务关系。已确定行政行为是一种法律行为,因为它以立法行为的规定为基础;在此基础上,它不同于实际行动。行政行为与技术行为或公法领域的简单行为之间的区别得到了说明。确定拒绝满足某人要求的决定属于消极行政行为。强调行政行为是公法领域的决定;用利益理论、从属理论和主体理论来区分公法和私法。通过行政行为的主体是履行公共行政职能的机构。值得注意的是,他的理解中包含的功能方法允许他同时考虑授权主体、专门成立的委员会和私人,如果立法者授权他们执行公共行政的话。他强调,立法者决定哪些行为不属于行政行为。在研究的基础上,就行政行为的特征得出了如下结论:外部导向、法律行为、公法领域、由机 构通过、适用于单独确定的一个人或多个人、建立、改变或终止法律关系或建立实际状态、不属于 行政行为定义的否定部分中规定的决定之一或法律未涵盖其通过。建议在实践中使用行政行为的特征作为确定机构决定/行为性质的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信