Selection of traditional rice varieties for Galle District based on agronomic characteristics and farmer-consumer preferences

W. G. M. Wickramasinghe, L. M. Abeywickrama, M. C. Millawithanachchi
{"title":"Selection of traditional rice varieties for Galle District based on agronomic characteristics and farmer-consumer preferences","authors":"W. G. M. Wickramasinghe, L. M. Abeywickrama, M. C. Millawithanachchi","doi":"10.4038/tare.v26i4.5652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the growing trend of cultivating traditional rice varieties in the Galle District this study aimed to select suitable varieties that align with the preference of farmers and consumers. A survey of traditional rice varieties cultivated in the Galle district led to the collection of thirty traditional rice accessions from the Germplasm collection of the Plant Genetic Resource Center (PGRC) for preliminary evaluation with 4 traditional varieties from the Rice Research Station Labuduwa (RRSLd). Preliminary evaluations were conducted during the 2017 Yala season at the RRSLd. Subsequently, five accessions/varieties from the preliminary evaluations, six varieties from Regional Rice Research and Development Center-Bombuwala (RRRDCBw/RRSBw), and two improved rice varieties; (Ld 368 and Bw 372) were further evaluated during the 2017/18 Maha season using a Randomized Complete Block Design with two replicates in RRSLd. The evaluations involved the active participation of farmers, researchers, consumers, and traders. Varieties were assessed on eight morphological characteristics. using the pair-wise ranking method of the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approach. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis One Way ANOVA model. Bw 372 and Ld 368 received above-average rankings, with Suwandal (RRSLd) achieving the highest score for cooked rice quality. In the overall evaluation Ld 368, Kahawanu (4250), Kuruluthuda (RRSBw), and Suwandal (RRSLd) emerged as preferred choices. These selections were tested in farmer fields during the 2018 Yala season with Ld 368, Kuruluthuda (RRSBw), and Kahawanu recording higher yields. In the 2018/19 Maha season, all the varieties tested in the 2018 Yala season were tested in farmer fields except Kahawanu (4250). Ld 368 and Bw 372 outperformed others in farmer fields. Based on farmer preference and yield performance, Gonabaru (farmer selected) and Kuruluthuda (RRSBw) were the most preferred traditional rice varieties, followed by Suwandal (RRSLd) and Rathdal (RRSLd).","PeriodicalId":191739,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension","volume":"4 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v26i4.5652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the growing trend of cultivating traditional rice varieties in the Galle District this study aimed to select suitable varieties that align with the preference of farmers and consumers. A survey of traditional rice varieties cultivated in the Galle district led to the collection of thirty traditional rice accessions from the Germplasm collection of the Plant Genetic Resource Center (PGRC) for preliminary evaluation with 4 traditional varieties from the Rice Research Station Labuduwa (RRSLd). Preliminary evaluations were conducted during the 2017 Yala season at the RRSLd. Subsequently, five accessions/varieties from the preliminary evaluations, six varieties from Regional Rice Research and Development Center-Bombuwala (RRRDCBw/RRSBw), and two improved rice varieties; (Ld 368 and Bw 372) were further evaluated during the 2017/18 Maha season using a Randomized Complete Block Design with two replicates in RRSLd. The evaluations involved the active participation of farmers, researchers, consumers, and traders. Varieties were assessed on eight morphological characteristics. using the pair-wise ranking method of the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approach. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal Wallis One Way ANOVA model. Bw 372 and Ld 368 received above-average rankings, with Suwandal (RRSLd) achieving the highest score for cooked rice quality. In the overall evaluation Ld 368, Kahawanu (4250), Kuruluthuda (RRSBw), and Suwandal (RRSLd) emerged as preferred choices. These selections were tested in farmer fields during the 2018 Yala season with Ld 368, Kuruluthuda (RRSBw), and Kahawanu recording higher yields. In the 2018/19 Maha season, all the varieties tested in the 2018 Yala season were tested in farmer fields except Kahawanu (4250). Ld 368 and Bw 372 outperformed others in farmer fields. Based on farmer preference and yield performance, Gonabaru (farmer selected) and Kuruluthuda (RRSBw) were the most preferred traditional rice varieties, followed by Suwandal (RRSLd) and Rathdal (RRSLd).
根据农艺特性和农民消费者的偏好,为加勒地区选择传统水稻品种
鉴于加勒地区种植传统水稻品种的趋势日益增长,本研究旨在选择符合农民和消费者偏好的合适品种。通过对加勒区种植的传统水稻品种进行调查,从植物遗传资源中心(PGRC)的种质资源库中收集了 30 个传统水稻品种,并与拉布杜瓦水稻研究站(RSLd)的 4 个传统品种进行了初步评估。初步评估于 2017 年亚拉季节在拉布杜瓦水稻研究站进行。随后,在 2017/18 年的马哈季节,采用随机完全区组设计,在拉布杜瓦水稻研究站进行了两次重复,进一步评估了初步评估中的 5 个登录品种/品种、区域水稻研究与发展中心(RRRDCBw/RRSBw)的 6 个品种以及 2 个改良水稻品种(Ld 368 和 Bw 372)。农民、研究人员、消费者和贸易商积极参与了评估。采用参与式农村评估(PRA)方法中的成对排序法,对品种的八个形态特征进行了评估。数据分析采用 Kruskal Wallis 单向方差分析模型。Bw 372 和 Ld 368 的排名高于平均水平,其中 Suwandal(RRSLd)的熟米质量得分最高。在总体评价中,Ld 368、Kahawanu(4250)、Kuruluthuda(RRSBw)和 Suwandal(RRSLd)成为首选。这些品种在 2018 年亚拉季节的农田中进行了测试,Ld 368、Kuruluthuda(RRSBw)和 Kahawanu 产量较高。在 2018/19 马哈种植季,除了 Kahawanu(4250)之外,2018 亚拉种植季测试的所有品种都在农民田间进行了测试。Ld 368 和 Bw 372 在农民田间的表现优于其他品种。根据农民的偏好和产量表现,Gonabaru(农民选择)和 Kuruluthuda(RRSBw)是最受欢迎的传统水稻品种,其次是 Suwandal(RRSLd)和 Rathdal(RRSLd)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信