Current challenges of healthcare co-creation and testbeds

Janne Lahtiranta, Eva Collanus, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Antti Tuomisto
{"title":"Current challenges of healthcare co-creation and testbeds","authors":"Janne Lahtiranta, Eva Collanus, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Antti Tuomisto","doi":"10.23996/fjhw.130584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent years, co-creation – especially in the form of testbeds – has been more and more utilized in healthcare sector. As is common in the Northern Europe, most of the testbed services are offered by public sector organizations, such as higher education institutes. These kinds of organizations have core functions, that are often defined in the law, and co-creation in one form or another, may not be included in the functions. It follows from this that the operational maturity may differ significantly from one testbed to another. This paper investigates the current state of the Finnish healthcare testbeds, their “good” and the “bad”. The data used in this review was collected during the development of Health Care Testbed Maturity Assessment instrument (HCTM). During the development, a series of so-called friendly audits were performed on Finnish testbeds, during which the testbed operators’ insider views were collected for later use alongside data used for instrument development. This article will summarize these views, provide a current view to the Finnish healthcare testbeds, and conclude with practical remarks on how to develop the maturity of Finnish healthcare testbeds.","PeriodicalId":424295,"journal":{"name":"Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.130584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent years, co-creation – especially in the form of testbeds – has been more and more utilized in healthcare sector. As is common in the Northern Europe, most of the testbed services are offered by public sector organizations, such as higher education institutes. These kinds of organizations have core functions, that are often defined in the law, and co-creation in one form or another, may not be included in the functions. It follows from this that the operational maturity may differ significantly from one testbed to another. This paper investigates the current state of the Finnish healthcare testbeds, their “good” and the “bad”. The data used in this review was collected during the development of Health Care Testbed Maturity Assessment instrument (HCTM). During the development, a series of so-called friendly audits were performed on Finnish testbeds, during which the testbed operators’ insider views were collected for later use alongside data used for instrument development. This article will summarize these views, provide a current view to the Finnish healthcare testbeds, and conclude with practical remarks on how to develop the maturity of Finnish healthcare testbeds.
医疗保健共同创造和试验平台当前面临的挑战
近年来,共同创造(尤其是以试验平台的形式)越来越多地应用于医疗保健领域。在北欧,大多数试验台服务都是由高等教育机构等公共部门组织提供的。这类组织的核心职能通常在法律中有所规定,这种或那种形式的共同创造可能并不包括在这些职能中。由此可见,不同试验台的运行成熟度可能会有很大差异。本文对芬兰医疗保健试验平台的现状、"优点 "和 "缺点 "进行了调查。本综述所使用的数据是在开发医疗保健试验平台成熟度评估工具(HCTM)期间收集的。在开发过程中,对芬兰的测试平台进行了一系列所谓的友好审核,收集了测试平台操作人员的内部意见,以便日后与用于仪器开发的数据一起使用。本文将总结这些意见,提供芬兰医疗保健测试平台的现状,并就如何提高芬兰医疗保健测试平台的成熟度提出实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信