Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Aortic Valve Replacement Modality Selection in Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients

R. Chokesuwattanaskul, A. Petchlorlian, Piyoros Lertsanguansinchai, Paramaporn Suttirut, N. Prasitlumkum, S. Srimahachota, W. Buddhari
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Aortic Valve Replacement Modality Selection in Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients","authors":"R. Chokesuwattanaskul, A. Petchlorlian, Piyoros Lertsanguansinchai, Paramaporn Suttirut, N. Prasitlumkum, S. Srimahachota, W. Buddhari","doi":"10.3390/medsci12010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current recommendation for bioprosthetic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated the performance of a machine learning-based predictive model using existing periprocedural variables for valve replacement modality selection. We analyzed 415 patients in a retrospective longitudinal cohort of adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A total of 72 clinical variables including demographic data, patient comorbidities, and preoperative investigation characteristics were collected on each patient. We fit models using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and decision tree techniques. The accuracy of the prediction on confusion matrix was used to assess model performance. The most predictive independent variable for valve selection by LASSO regression was frailty score. Variables that predict SAVR consisted of low frailty score (value at or below 2) and complex coronary artery diseases (DVD/TVD). Variables that predicted TAVR consisted of high frailty score (at or greater than 6), history of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), calcified aorta, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The LASSO-generated predictive model achieved 98% accuracy on valve replacement modality selection from testing data. The decision tree model consisted of fewer important parameters, namely frailty score, CKD, STS score, age, and history of PCI. The most predictive factor for valve replacement selection was frailty score. The predictive models using different statistical learning methods achieved an excellent concordance predictive accuracy rate of between 93% and 98%.","PeriodicalId":18539,"journal":{"name":"Medical Sciences","volume":"67 s268","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current recommendation for bioprosthetic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated the performance of a machine learning-based predictive model using existing periprocedural variables for valve replacement modality selection. We analyzed 415 patients in a retrospective longitudinal cohort of adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A total of 72 clinical variables including demographic data, patient comorbidities, and preoperative investigation characteristics were collected on each patient. We fit models using LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and decision tree techniques. The accuracy of the prediction on confusion matrix was used to assess model performance. The most predictive independent variable for valve selection by LASSO regression was frailty score. Variables that predict SAVR consisted of low frailty score (value at or below 2) and complex coronary artery diseases (DVD/TVD). Variables that predicted TAVR consisted of high frailty score (at or greater than 6), history of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), calcified aorta, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The LASSO-generated predictive model achieved 98% accuracy on valve replacement modality selection from testing data. The decision tree model consisted of fewer important parameters, namely frailty score, CKD, STS score, age, and history of PCI. The most predictive factor for valve replacement selection was frailty score. The predictive models using different statistical learning methods achieved an excellent concordance predictive accuracy rate of between 93% and 98%.
基于机器学习的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣置换术方式选择预测模型
目前对重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者进行生物人工瓣膜置换术的建议是手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)或经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。我们评估了基于机器学习的预测模型的性能,该模型利用现有的围手术期变量进行瓣膜置换方式的选择。我们分析了因主动脉瓣狭窄而接受主动脉瓣置换术的成年患者的回顾性纵向队列中的 415 名患者。我们收集了每位患者的 72 个临床变量,包括人口统计学数据、患者合并症和术前检查特征。我们使用 LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)和决策树技术拟合模型。混淆矩阵预测的准确性用于评估模型的性能。通过LASSO回归,最能预测瓣膜选择的自变量是虚弱评分。预测 SAVR 的变量包括低虚弱评分(值等于或低于 2)和复杂冠状动脉疾病(DVD/TVD)。预测 TAVR 的变量包括高虚弱评分(大于或等于 6 分)、冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)史、主动脉钙化和慢性肾病(CKD)。LASSO 生成的预测模型从测试数据中选择瓣膜置换方式的准确率达到 98%。决策树模型由较少的重要参数组成,即虚弱评分、CKD、STS 评分、年龄和 PCI 病史。对瓣膜置换选择最具预测性的因素是虚弱评分。采用不同统计学习方法的预测模型达到了极高的一致性,预测准确率在 93% 到 98% 之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信