Quality and Image Processing Analysis versus Radiation Dose in Hip Radiographic Examinations

Claus V. T., Baumhardt T., De Mello S., Soares F. A.
{"title":"Quality and Image Processing Analysis versus Radiation Dose in Hip Radiographic Examinations","authors":"Claus V. T., Baumhardt T., De Mello S., Soares F. A.","doi":"10.9734/air/2023/v24i61011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Evaluate the quality and processing of images in hip radiographic examinations. Study Design: Six combinations of exposure techniques commonly used in clinical practice were used, keeping the voltage (kVp) value constant, varying only the current and time relationship (mA.s). Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Radiodiagnosis Laboratory of the Radiology and Medical Physics graduation courses at the Franciscan University (UFN), as part of the research developed during the Image Processing course in the second semester of 2023. Methodology: Image acquisition and radiation dose measurement were performed using clinical radiographic equipment and a model resembling hip anatomy, along with a dosimetric system to quantify radiation dose at the entrance surface (ESAK). The captured images were digitized through a computerized radiography (CR) system, enabling quantitative analysis using histograms and Regions of Interest (ROI) in anatomical structures relevant for diagnosis. Signal and noise values were evaluated, allowing the determination of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiographic contrast (CR). Results: The results revealed significant differences among the various techniques employed. Some images displayed lower SNR, ranging from 8.14% to 15.60%, yet with higher CR, varying between 5.48% and 22.29%. Remarkably, one technique (70 kVp with 16 mA.s) demonstrated the best cost-benefit relationship, reducing radiation exposure by 48.7% (from 6.32 to 3.24 mGy) with minimal reduction in SNR, less than 10%, and a 5.47% increase in CR. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance for radiology professionals seeking imaging techniques that guarantee high diagnostic quality with minimal patient exposure. Prioritizing safer and more effective radiological practices is essential for delivering quality healthcare services.","PeriodicalId":502836,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Research","volume":"5 2‐3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2023/v24i61011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Evaluate the quality and processing of images in hip radiographic examinations. Study Design: Six combinations of exposure techniques commonly used in clinical practice were used, keeping the voltage (kVp) value constant, varying only the current and time relationship (mA.s). Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Radiodiagnosis Laboratory of the Radiology and Medical Physics graduation courses at the Franciscan University (UFN), as part of the research developed during the Image Processing course in the second semester of 2023. Methodology: Image acquisition and radiation dose measurement were performed using clinical radiographic equipment and a model resembling hip anatomy, along with a dosimetric system to quantify radiation dose at the entrance surface (ESAK). The captured images were digitized through a computerized radiography (CR) system, enabling quantitative analysis using histograms and Regions of Interest (ROI) in anatomical structures relevant for diagnosis. Signal and noise values were evaluated, allowing the determination of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiographic contrast (CR). Results: The results revealed significant differences among the various techniques employed. Some images displayed lower SNR, ranging from 8.14% to 15.60%, yet with higher CR, varying between 5.48% and 22.29%. Remarkably, one technique (70 kVp with 16 mA.s) demonstrated the best cost-benefit relationship, reducing radiation exposure by 48.7% (from 6.32 to 3.24 mGy) with minimal reduction in SNR, less than 10%, and a 5.47% increase in CR. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance for radiology professionals seeking imaging techniques that guarantee high diagnostic quality with minimal patient exposure. Prioritizing safer and more effective radiological practices is essential for delivering quality healthcare services.
髋部 X 射线检查的质量和图像处理分析与辐射剂量对比
目的:评估髋关节放射检查图像的质量和处理。 研究设计:使用临床常用的六种曝光技术组合,保持电压(kVp)值不变,仅改变电流和时间关系(mA.s)。 研究地点和时间:研究在弗朗西斯坎大学(UFN)放射学和医学物理学毕业课程的放射诊断实验室进行,是 2023 年第二学期图像处理课程研究的一部分。 研究方法:使用临床放射设备和类似髋关节解剖的模型,以及用于量化入口表面辐射剂量的剂量测定系统(ESAK),进行图像采集和辐射剂量测定。采集的图像通过计算机放射成像(CR)系统进行数字化处理,从而能够利用直方图和与诊断相关的解剖结构中的感兴趣区(ROI)进行定量分析。对信号和噪声值进行评估,从而确定信噪比(SNR)和射线对比度(CR)。 结果结果显示,所采用的各种技术之间存在明显差异。有些图像的信噪比较低,在 8.14% 到 15.60% 之间,但对比度较高,在 5.48% 到 22.29% 之间。值得注意的是,有一种技术(70 kVp,16 mA.s)显示出最佳的成本效益关系,其辐射量减少了 48.7%(从 6.32 mGy 减少到 3.24 mGy),而信噪比却降低了不到 10%,CR 增加了 5.47%。 结论这些研究结果凸显了放射科专业人员寻求成像技术的重要性,即在保证高诊断质量的同时,尽量减少对患者的照射。优先考虑更安全、更有效的放射实践对于提供优质医疗服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信