Are Brazilian innovation systems innovative? Regional and sectorial decompositions of triple-helix synergies

Mariza Almeida, Igone Porto-Gómez, Loet Leydesdorff (posthumous)
{"title":"Are Brazilian innovation systems innovative? Regional and sectorial decompositions of triple-helix synergies","authors":"Mariza Almeida, Igone Porto-Gómez, Loet Leydesdorff (posthumous)","doi":"10.3145/epi.2023.dic.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A knowledge-based economy adds innovation as another dynamic to a political economy. Whereas a political economy is institutionalized -for example, in a nation state- the knowledge base is volatile although it leaves footprints behind by transforming the institutional layers. This transformation into new options can be measured as redundancy using the Triple-Helix indicator. The balance between historical entropy generation and the knowledge-based generation of options can be measured in terms of positive and negative contributions to the prevailing uncertainty. At what scale and in which sectors is synergy among geographical, technological, and organizational distributions of firms evident? Using mutual information in the three dimensions as an indicator, we analyse a dataset of more than 16 million firms in Brazil and compute synergy within and across states and sectors in this country in terms of bits of information. The results suggest that no synergy is generated at the national level. The political economy of the country has not (yet) been transformed into a national innovation system. At state level, synergies vary according to geographical levels and sectors due to the specifics of the states. Above-average values were found for some states in the South and Southeast Regions. Also, the political capital, Brasilia, has resulted to have no impact in the innovation system of Brazil.","PeriodicalId":504184,"journal":{"name":"El Profesional de la información","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El Profesional de la información","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.dic.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A knowledge-based economy adds innovation as another dynamic to a political economy. Whereas a political economy is institutionalized -for example, in a nation state- the knowledge base is volatile although it leaves footprints behind by transforming the institutional layers. This transformation into new options can be measured as redundancy using the Triple-Helix indicator. The balance between historical entropy generation and the knowledge-based generation of options can be measured in terms of positive and negative contributions to the prevailing uncertainty. At what scale and in which sectors is synergy among geographical, technological, and organizational distributions of firms evident? Using mutual information in the three dimensions as an indicator, we analyse a dataset of more than 16 million firms in Brazil and compute synergy within and across states and sectors in this country in terms of bits of information. The results suggest that no synergy is generated at the national level. The political economy of the country has not (yet) been transformed into a national innovation system. At state level, synergies vary according to geographical levels and sectors due to the specifics of the states. Above-average values were found for some states in the South and Southeast Regions. Also, the political capital, Brasilia, has resulted to have no impact in the innovation system of Brazil.
巴西的创新体系具有创新性吗?三螺旋协同效应的地区和部门分解
知识经济为政治经济增添了创新的活力。政治经济是制度化的--例如,在一个国家--而知识基础是不稳定的,尽管它通过改变制度层留下了足迹。这种向新选择的转变可以用三重熵指标来衡量冗余度。历史熵的产生与基于知识的选择方案的产生之间的平衡可以用对普遍不确定性的正负贡献来衡量。企业的地理、技术和组织分布之间的协同作用在什么规模和哪些行业明显?我们以这三个维度的相互信息为指标,分析了巴西 1600 多万家企业的数据集,并以信息比特为单位计算了巴西各州和各部门内部和之间的协同效应。结果表明,在国家层面没有产生协同效应。巴西的政治经济(尚未)转变为国家创新体系。在州一级,由于各州的具体情况不同,协同效应也因地理层次和部门而异。南部和东南部一些州的协同效应高于平均值。此外,政治首都巴西利亚对巴西的创新体系没有产生任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信