The models of co-teaching and a spectrum for assessing collaboration: Examining English language co-teaching practices in South Korea

Sung-Yeon Kim, Ian Moodie
{"title":"The models of co-teaching and a spectrum for assessing collaboration: Examining English language co-teaching practices in South Korea","authors":"Sung-Yeon Kim, Ian Moodie","doi":"10.1177/13621688231218816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many countries have developed co-teaching programs pairing native-English-speaking teachers with local English teachers. Despite the optimistic aims of these programs, research has revealed challenges for co-teaching, such as with teachers’ contrasting belief systems or cultural differences. However, research has yet to examine the models of co-teaching applied and the extent of collaboration observed with multiple co-teaching pairs across different teaching contexts as is done in the present study. The study uses qualitative analysis, aiming to examine the approaches to co-teaching and the degree of collaboration with 14 pairs of co-teachers across different school levels (primary, middle, and high schools) in South Korea. Based on classroom observations and interview data, the study found that of seven models of English-language co-teaching (one teaching / one assisting, team teaching, one teaching / one assessing, parallel teaching, alternative teaching [pre-teaching], alternative teaching [re-teaching], and station teaching), the one teaching / one assisting model was prevalent for 10 dyads and the team-teaching model for four dyads. The other models of coteaching were not used or reported to be used by these participants. In addition, by focusing on the observed and stated practices of these participants, the study adds to the literature by showing how co-teaching collaboration occurs across a spectrum, from no collaboration to full collaboration, with differing levels of engagement throughout. The study suggests that this proposed spectrum will be useful for researching and assessing co-teaching practices, and it implies that the efficacy of co-teaching could be increased by supporting fuller collaboration and multiple approaches to co-teaching beyond the dominant one teaching / one assisting model.","PeriodicalId":508028,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231218816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries have developed co-teaching programs pairing native-English-speaking teachers with local English teachers. Despite the optimistic aims of these programs, research has revealed challenges for co-teaching, such as with teachers’ contrasting belief systems or cultural differences. However, research has yet to examine the models of co-teaching applied and the extent of collaboration observed with multiple co-teaching pairs across different teaching contexts as is done in the present study. The study uses qualitative analysis, aiming to examine the approaches to co-teaching and the degree of collaboration with 14 pairs of co-teachers across different school levels (primary, middle, and high schools) in South Korea. Based on classroom observations and interview data, the study found that of seven models of English-language co-teaching (one teaching / one assisting, team teaching, one teaching / one assessing, parallel teaching, alternative teaching [pre-teaching], alternative teaching [re-teaching], and station teaching), the one teaching / one assisting model was prevalent for 10 dyads and the team-teaching model for four dyads. The other models of coteaching were not used or reported to be used by these participants. In addition, by focusing on the observed and stated practices of these participants, the study adds to the literature by showing how co-teaching collaboration occurs across a spectrum, from no collaboration to full collaboration, with differing levels of engagement throughout. The study suggests that this proposed spectrum will be useful for researching and assessing co-teaching practices, and it implies that the efficacy of co-teaching could be increased by supporting fuller collaboration and multiple approaches to co-teaching beyond the dominant one teaching / one assisting model.
共同教学的模式和评估合作的光谱:考察韩国的英语合作教学实践
许多国家都制定了共同教学计划,将以英语为母语的教师与当地英语教师配对。尽管这些项目的目标是乐观的,但研究显示,合作教学面临着挑战,例如教师之间的信仰体系或文化差异。然而,目前的研究还没有像本研究那样,对合作教学的应用模式以及在不同教学情境中观察到的多对合作教学的合作程度进行研究。本研究采用定性分析的方法,旨在考察韩国不同年级(小学、初中和高中)的 14 对合作教学者的合作方式和合作程度。根据课堂观察和访谈数据,研究发现,在七种英语共同教学模式(一教一辅、团队教学、一教一评、平行教学、替代教学[预习]、替代教学[复习]和站位教学)中,一教一辅模式在 10 对教师中普遍存在,团队教学模式在 4 对教师中普遍存在。这些参与者没有使用或报告使用过其他共同教学模式。此外,通过关注这些参与者所观察到的和陈述的实践,本研究通过展示共同教学合作如何发生在一个范围内(从无合作到全面合作,整个过程中的参与程度各不相同),对文献进行了补充。该研究表明,所提出的这一光谱对于研究和评估共同教学实践非常有用,它还意味着,除了主要的一教一辅模式外,还可以通过支持更充分的合作和多种共同教学方法来提高共同教学的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信