Digital Slavery in Tiktok Social Media Christian Fuchs Perspective

Ibnu Azka
{"title":"Digital Slavery in Tiktok Social Media Christian Fuchs Perspective","authors":"Ibnu Azka","doi":"10.52728/ijss.v4i4.1025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initially, the practice of slavery was known as physical violence, this is commonplace in several countries that used to be very thick with the practice of slavery, this era actually transmits various new forms of exploitation, especially through digital media.  This article discusses the practice of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The large number of begging practices on social media TikTok indicates an act of exploitation unnoticed by those who do it, this can be referred to as the practice of slavery.This research uses a netnography qualitative descriptive method by tracing and analyzing accounts that often live stream on  TikTok by selling themselves. This article wants to answer some of the following questions. First, what is Christian Fuchs' view of the practice of slavery? Second, how is the model of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The results of this study show First, that Fuchs views digital media as having shaped the exploitation and commodification of social media, social media often utilizes data and content generated by users as a source of economic value. In this context, social media users are often unpaid \"laborers\", as they indirectly contribute to creating value for the platform, but rarely get the equivalent in return. Implications: Slavery is not only through physical touch, but through digital technology.","PeriodicalId":159284,"journal":{"name":"Ilomata International Journal of Social Science","volume":" 53","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilomata International Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i4.1025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Initially, the practice of slavery was known as physical violence, this is commonplace in several countries that used to be very thick with the practice of slavery, this era actually transmits various new forms of exploitation, especially through digital media.  This article discusses the practice of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The large number of begging practices on social media TikTok indicates an act of exploitation unnoticed by those who do it, this can be referred to as the practice of slavery.This research uses a netnography qualitative descriptive method by tracing and analyzing accounts that often live stream on  TikTok by selling themselves. This article wants to answer some of the following questions. First, what is Christian Fuchs' view of the practice of slavery? Second, how is the model of digital slavery on social media TikTok. The results of this study show First, that Fuchs views digital media as having shaped the exploitation and commodification of social media, social media often utilizes data and content generated by users as a source of economic value. In this context, social media users are often unpaid "laborers", as they indirectly contribute to creating value for the platform, but rarely get the equivalent in return. Implications: Slavery is not only through physical touch, but through digital technology.
Tiktok 社交媒体中的数字奴隶制 克里斯蒂安-福克斯视角
最初,奴隶制的做法被称为身体暴力,这在过去奴隶制做法非常严重的几个国家司空见惯,这个时代实际上传播着各种新的剥削形式,特别是通过数字媒体。 本文讨论的是社交媒体 TikTok 上的数字奴役行为。社交媒体 TikTok 上大量的乞讨行为表明了一种不为乞讨者所察觉的剥削行为,这可以被称为奴役行为。本研究采用了一种网状结构的定性描述方法,通过追踪和分析那些经常在 TikTok 上直播卖身的账号来进行研究。本文希望回答以下几个问题。第一,克里斯蒂安-福克斯(Christian Fuchs)如何看待奴役行为?第二,社交媒体 TikTok 上的数字奴役模式如何。研究结果表明 第一,福克斯认为数字媒体塑造了社交媒体的剥削和商品化,社交媒体经常利用用户产生的数据和内容作为经济价值的来源。在这种情况下,社交媒体用户往往是无报酬的 "劳动者",因为他们间接地为平台创造了价值,却很少得到等价的回报。影响:奴役不仅通过身体接触,还通过数字技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信