Analysis of outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction aged 90 years and older: a single center experience

Q3 Medicine
P. Duplyakova, T. Pavlova, D. Duplyakov
{"title":"Analysis of outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction aged 90 years and older: a single center experience","authors":"P. Duplyakova, T. Pavlova, D. Duplyakov","doi":"10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an invasive approach in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aged 90 years and older.Material and methods. This retrospective single-center study was conducted at the V. P. Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary. In 20132020, 104 patients aged 90 years and older were hospitalized with a diagnosis of STEMI. The mean age of patients was 91,7 years (90-100), while the proportion of women was 67,3%. Patients included in the analysis were divided into groups of conservative treatment (n=81, mean age, 91,9 (90-100) years, women 70,4%) and invasive management (coronary angiography + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) (n=23, mean age, 91,0 (90-94) years, women, 56,5%).Results. The groups were comparable in basic characteristics. In-hospital mortality in the conservative strategy group was 48,1% vs 17,4% in the invasive management group (p=0,009; odds ratio (OR) 3,35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1,23-9,15). During the first year after discharge, 25,9% (n=21) died in the conservative strategy group and 30,4% (n=7) in the invasive strategy group (p=0,79; OR 0,85; 95% CI 0,42-1,75). In total (during the hospitalization period and within 1 year after discharge), 60 people (74,1%) died in the conservative strategy group, while in the invasive treatment group — 11 (47,8%) (p=0,02; OR 3,11; 95% CI 1,19-8,11). Life expectancy in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older after discharge from hospital was 83,95 days for the conservative strategy group and 103,85 days for the invasive strategy group (p=0,67).Conclusion. The data obtained in our study support primary PCI as a treatment strategy for patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older.","PeriodicalId":21389,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an invasive approach in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aged 90 years and older.Material and methods. This retrospective single-center study was conducted at the V. P. Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary. In 20132020, 104 patients aged 90 years and older were hospitalized with a diagnosis of STEMI. The mean age of patients was 91,7 years (90-100), while the proportion of women was 67,3%. Patients included in the analysis were divided into groups of conservative treatment (n=81, mean age, 91,9 (90-100) years, women 70,4%) and invasive management (coronary angiography + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) (n=23, mean age, 91,0 (90-94) years, women, 56,5%).Results. The groups were comparable in basic characteristics. In-hospital mortality in the conservative strategy group was 48,1% vs 17,4% in the invasive management group (p=0,009; odds ratio (OR) 3,35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1,23-9,15). During the first year after discharge, 25,9% (n=21) died in the conservative strategy group and 30,4% (n=7) in the invasive strategy group (p=0,79; OR 0,85; 95% CI 0,42-1,75). In total (during the hospitalization period and within 1 year after discharge), 60 people (74,1%) died in the conservative strategy group, while in the invasive treatment group — 11 (47,8%) (p=0,02; OR 3,11; 95% CI 1,19-8,11). Life expectancy in patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older after discharge from hospital was 83,95 days for the conservative strategy group and 103,85 days for the invasive strategy group (p=0,67).Conclusion. The data obtained in our study support primary PCI as a treatment strategy for patients with STEMI aged 90 years and older.
90 岁及以上 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后分析:单中心经验
目的评估对 90 岁及以上 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者采用侵入性方法的有效性和安全性。这项回顾性单中心研究在萨马拉地区临床心脏病医院(V. P. Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary)进行。2013 年至 2020 年,104 名 90 岁及以上的患者被诊断为 STEMI 而住院治疗。患者平均年龄为 91.7 岁(90-100 岁),女性比例为 67.3%。纳入分析的患者分为保守治疗组(81 人,平均年龄 91.9 岁(90-100 岁),女性占 70.4%)和侵入性治疗组(冠状动脉造影术 + 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI))(23 人,平均年龄 91.0 岁(90-94 岁),女性占 56.5%)。两组患者的基本特征相当。保守治疗组的院内死亡率为 48.1%,而有创治疗组为 17.4%(P=0,009;几率比(OR)3,35;95% 置信区间(CI)1,23-9,15)。出院后第一年,保守治疗组有 25.9% (21 人)死亡,侵入治疗组有 30.4% (7 人)死亡(P=0,79;OR 0,85;95% CI 0,42-1,75)。总计(住院期间和出院后 1 年内),保守治疗组有 60 人(74.1%)死亡,而有创治疗组有 11 人(47.8%)死亡(P=0,02;OR 3,11;95% CI 1,19-8,11)。保守治疗组 90 岁及以上 STEMI 患者出院后的预期寿命为 83.95 天,有创治疗组为 103.85 天(P=0.67)。我们的研究数据支持将初级 PCI 作为 90 岁及以上 STEMI 患者的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Russian Journal of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Cardiology has been issued since 1996. The language of this publication is Russian, with tables of contents and abstracts of all articles presented in English as well. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Eugene V.Shlyakhto, President of the Russian Society of Cardiology. The aim of the journal is both scientific and practical, also with referring to organizing matters of the Society. The best of all cardiologic research in Russia is submitted to the Journal. Moreover, it contains useful tips and clinical examples for practicing cardiologists. Journal is peer-reviewed, with multi-stage editing. The editorial board is presented by the leading cardiologists from different cities of Russia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信