Social context of Intimate Partner Violence and system response during Covid-19 in Africa: A scoping review

O. Agunbiade
{"title":"Social context of Intimate Partner Violence and system response during Covid-19 in Africa: A scoping review","authors":"O. Agunbiade","doi":"10.36922/ijps.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global social and public health crisis entrenched in a broader social and cultural context. COVID-19 has disproportionately affected social relationships and interactions in diverse ways. This scoping review attempts to synthesize evidence on the social contexts of IPVs and system responses to covid-19 in Africa. Methods: The scoping review followed Arksey and O' Malley (2005) approach as refined by Joana Briggs Institute (2020). All published and unpublished literature were sourced from bibliographic databases, institutional websites, and electronic libraries from January 2020 to December 2021. The search strategy was executed in three phases using multiple search techniques from the following databases: Social Science Database and Sociological Abstract (via EBSCO), Africa Journal Archive and ProQuest (Coronavirus Research Library, Middle East & Africa Collection, Psychology, Sociology and Social Science Database) and Google Scholar. In addition, we searched the World Bank e-Library, BBC portal and other relevant websites. Only the articles written in English language were screened following the Briggs (2020) recommendations. Extracted information from these sources was convergently synthesised and presented using both thematic approach and descriptive statistics were suitable. Results: Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria, and the results revealed a varied prevalence of IPVs. Emotional, economic and a few cases of such violence amongst minor. IPVs was an everyday reality but grew worse among some women depending on their contexts and relationships during covid-19 outbreak and the lockdown measure that was adopted. Emotional and economic violence were the most reported, while a few cases of IPVs was mentioned among minors. Response from state and non-state actors were inadequate, reactionary and less transformative to address complex emergency like covid-19 and the possible impacts on livelihoods and intimate relationships.","PeriodicalId":73473,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global social and public health crisis entrenched in a broader social and cultural context. COVID-19 has disproportionately affected social relationships and interactions in diverse ways. This scoping review attempts to synthesize evidence on the social contexts of IPVs and system responses to covid-19 in Africa. Methods: The scoping review followed Arksey and O' Malley (2005) approach as refined by Joana Briggs Institute (2020). All published and unpublished literature were sourced from bibliographic databases, institutional websites, and electronic libraries from January 2020 to December 2021. The search strategy was executed in three phases using multiple search techniques from the following databases: Social Science Database and Sociological Abstract (via EBSCO), Africa Journal Archive and ProQuest (Coronavirus Research Library, Middle East & Africa Collection, Psychology, Sociology and Social Science Database) and Google Scholar. In addition, we searched the World Bank e-Library, BBC portal and other relevant websites. Only the articles written in English language were screened following the Briggs (2020) recommendations. Extracted information from these sources was convergently synthesised and presented using both thematic approach and descriptive statistics were suitable. Results: Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria, and the results revealed a varied prevalence of IPVs. Emotional, economic and a few cases of such violence amongst minor. IPVs was an everyday reality but grew worse among some women depending on their contexts and relationships during covid-19 outbreak and the lockdown measure that was adopted. Emotional and economic violence were the most reported, while a few cases of IPVs was mentioned among minors. Response from state and non-state actors were inadequate, reactionary and less transformative to address complex emergency like covid-19 and the possible impacts on livelihoods and intimate relationships.
非洲 Covid-19 期间亲密伴侣暴力的社会背景和系统响应:范围界定审查
背景:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球性的社会和公共卫生危机,在更广泛的社会和文化背景下根深蒂固。COVID-19 以不同的方式对社会关系和互动产生了极大的影响。本范围界定综述试图综合有关非洲 IPV 社会背景和系统应对 COVID-19 的证据。 方法:范围界定审查遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的方法,并经过 Joana Briggs 研究所(2020 年)的改进。2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,所有已发表和未发表的文献均来自书目数据库、机构网站和电子图书馆。搜索策略分三个阶段进行,使用多种搜索技术,从以下数据库中进行搜索:社会科学数据库和社会学文摘(通过 EBSCO)、非洲期刊档案和 ProQuest(冠状病毒研究图书馆、中东和非洲文集、心理学、社会学和社会科学数据库)以及谷歌学术。此外,我们还搜索了世界银行电子图书馆、英国广播公司门户网站和其他相关网站。根据布里格斯(2020 年)的建议,我们只筛选了以英语撰写的文章。我们对从这些来源中提取的信息进行了会聚合成,并采用专题方法和描述性统计方法(如适用)进行表述。 研究结果有 13 篇文章符合纳入标准,结果显示 IPV 的发生率各不相同。有情感暴力、经济暴力,也有少数未成年人遭受此类暴力。IPV 是一种日常现象,但在一些妇女中却愈演愈烈,这取决于她们在 covid-19 爆发期间所处的环境和人际关系,以及所采取的封锁措施。报告最多的是情感暴力和经济暴力,未成年人中也有少数 IPV 案件。国家和非国家行为者的应对措施不够充分、反应迟钝,不足以解决 19 型病毒等复杂的紧急情况以及对生计和亲密关系可能造成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信