Mediation in Administrative Law Proceeding: Comparative Legal Analysis of the Legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany and Ukraine

Dmytro Luchenko, Diana Kostina
{"title":"Mediation in Administrative Law Proceeding: Comparative Legal Analysis of the Legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany and Ukraine","authors":"Dmytro Luchenko, Diana Kostina","doi":"10.21564/2225-6555.2023.2.293046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights the content of mediation as an alternative method of administrative law dispute resolution through the prism of analysis of the relevant legislation. The relevance of this topic is primarily associated with the problems of resolution of administrative law disputes by the means of litigation. Therefore, mediation appears as a way to find a compromise for both parties, which can be achieved with the help of a mediator whose purpose is to resolve a conflict situation and assist in making a decision which would satisfy the interests of both parties. The purpose of this article is to study mediation as a method of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative process in its broadest sense, i.e., including administrative procedure and administrative proceedings, based on the comparative legal analysis of Ukrainian and German legislation. To achieve this goal and solve the tasks stipulated by it, the following scientific methods were used: systematic, formal legal, comparative legal, analysis and synthesis, and generalisation methods. The article examines the legislation on mediation: domestic and German. It is established that in the legislation and practice of European countries, mediation has been used for a rather long period of time in the resolution of administrative law disputes. Such a widespread use of mediation in administrative law issues is associated with Recommendation (2001) 9 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member States on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties, dated 5 September 2001, which emphasises that the use of alternative means of settling administrative disputes makes it possible to resolve these problems and bring the administrative authority closer to the public. The author substantiates the relevance of legal regulation of mediation as a means of resolving administrative law disputes in Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":285666,"journal":{"name":"Theory and practice of jurisprudence","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and practice of jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.2.293046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article highlights the content of mediation as an alternative method of administrative law dispute resolution through the prism of analysis of the relevant legislation. The relevance of this topic is primarily associated with the problems of resolution of administrative law disputes by the means of litigation. Therefore, mediation appears as a way to find a compromise for both parties, which can be achieved with the help of a mediator whose purpose is to resolve a conflict situation and assist in making a decision which would satisfy the interests of both parties. The purpose of this article is to study mediation as a method of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative process in its broadest sense, i.e., including administrative procedure and administrative proceedings, based on the comparative legal analysis of Ukrainian and German legislation. To achieve this goal and solve the tasks stipulated by it, the following scientific methods were used: systematic, formal legal, comparative legal, analysis and synthesis, and generalisation methods. The article examines the legislation on mediation: domestic and German. It is established that in the legislation and practice of European countries, mediation has been used for a rather long period of time in the resolution of administrative law disputes. Such a widespread use of mediation in administrative law issues is associated with Recommendation (2001) 9 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member States on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties, dated 5 September 2001, which emphasises that the use of alternative means of settling administrative disputes makes it possible to resolve these problems and bring the administrative authority closer to the public. The author substantiates the relevance of legal regulation of mediation as a means of resolving administrative law disputes in Ukraine.
行政法诉讼程序中的调解:德意志联邦共和国和乌克兰立法的比较法律分析
文章通过对相关立法的棱镜分析,强调了调解作为行政法争议解决替代方法的内容。本专题的相关性主要与通过诉讼手段解决行政法争议的问题有关。因此,调解似乎是一种为双方寻求妥协的方式,可以在调解员的帮助下实现,调解员的目的是解决冲突情况并协助做出满足双方利益的决定。本文的目的是在对乌克兰和德国立法进行比较法律分析的基础上,研究调解作为行政程序中最广义的替代性争端解决方法,即包括行政程序和行政诉讼程序。为实现这一目标并完成其规定的任务,采用了以下科学方法:系统法学方法、形式法学方法、比较法学方法、分析与综合法学方法以及概括法学方法。文章研究了国内和德国的调解立法。研究表明,在欧洲国家的立法和实践中,调解在解决行政法律纠纷中的应用已有相当长的时间。在行政法问题上如此广泛地使用调解与欧洲委员会部长委员会于 2001 年 9 月 5 日向成员国提出的关于行政当局与私人当事方之间诉讼替代办法的第 9 号建议(2001 年)有关,该建议强调,使用解决行政争议的替代办法可以解决这些问题,并使行政当局更接近公众。作者证实了乌克兰将调解作为解决行政法争议手段的法律规定的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信