Satisfaction levels of patients attending the outpatient department of a tertiary care center of India

Vijay Kumar, ID Ratnadeep Biswas, Vishnu S. Ojha, Kishore Kaushal
{"title":"Satisfaction levels of patients attending the outpatient department of a tertiary care center of India","authors":"Vijay Kumar, ID Ratnadeep Biswas, Vishnu S. Ojha, Kishore Kaushal","doi":"10.15584/ejcem.2023.4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and aim. Any hospital’s outpatient department (OPD) is regarded as the storefront of the facility, and patient satisfaction is an important measure of healthcare quality. Hence, this cross-sectional study was conducted in different OPDs at a tertiary care center. Material and methods. Two hundred patients were recruited, and structured personal interviews were conducted with questions based on the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). T-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare satisfaction scores between variables. Results. Upon analysis, 86% of the patients rated their overall experience as either ‘very good’ or ‘good’. Interpersonal manners (mean score±SD; 4.60±0.55), communication (4.39±0.66), general satisfaction (4.03±0.79), and technical qualities (3.86±0.57) were the domains in which the patients were most satisfied, while time spent with the doctor (3.77±0.89), accessibility and convenience (3.77±0.67), and financial aspects (3.37±0.83) were the areas that lagged. Conclusion. Satisfaction scores were found to vary significantly with gender, age, waiting times, and the number of visits per day. Regular patient satisfaction surveys should be conducted in all hospitals for devising interventions to provide patients with the best possible care.","PeriodicalId":11828,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/ejcem.2023.4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and aim. Any hospital’s outpatient department (OPD) is regarded as the storefront of the facility, and patient satisfaction is an important measure of healthcare quality. Hence, this cross-sectional study was conducted in different OPDs at a tertiary care center. Material and methods. Two hundred patients were recruited, and structured personal interviews were conducted with questions based on the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). T-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare satisfaction scores between variables. Results. Upon analysis, 86% of the patients rated their overall experience as either ‘very good’ or ‘good’. Interpersonal manners (mean score±SD; 4.60±0.55), communication (4.39±0.66), general satisfaction (4.03±0.79), and technical qualities (3.86±0.57) were the domains in which the patients were most satisfied, while time spent with the doctor (3.77±0.89), accessibility and convenience (3.77±0.67), and financial aspects (3.37±0.83) were the areas that lagged. Conclusion. Satisfaction scores were found to vary significantly with gender, age, waiting times, and the number of visits per day. Regular patient satisfaction surveys should be conducted in all hospitals for devising interventions to provide patients with the best possible care.
印度一家三级医疗中心门诊部病人的满意度
导言和目的。任何医院的门诊部(OPD)都被视为医院的门面,患者满意度是衡量医疗质量的重要标准。因此,本横断面研究在一家三级医疗中心的不同门诊部进行。材料和方法招募了 200 名患者,并根据患者满意度问卷简表(PSQ-18)的问题进行了结构化个人访谈。采用 T 检验和方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同变量的满意度得分。结果。经分析,86% 的患者将其总体体验评为 "非常好 "或 "好"。患者最满意的领域包括人际交往(平均分±SD;4.60±0.55)、沟通(4.39±0.66)、总体满意度(4.03±0.79)和技术质量(3.86±0.57),而与医生共处的时间(3.77±0.89)、可及性和便利性(3.77±0.67)以及经济方面(3.37±0.83)则相对落后。结论研究发现,满意度得分随性别、年龄、候诊时间和每天就诊次数的不同而有显著差异。所有医院都应定期进行患者满意度调查,以便制定干预措施,为患者提供尽可能好的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信