Encapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in chymosin treated milk protein-alginate microgel

Monica Pradhan, Agnescia Clarissa Sera, Sangeeta Prakash, C. Gaiani, B. Bhandari
{"title":"Encapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in chymosin treated milk protein-alginate microgel","authors":"Monica Pradhan, Agnescia Clarissa Sera, Sangeeta Prakash, C. Gaiani, B. Bhandari","doi":"10.54796/njb.v11i2.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria helps to protect its viability in food and enhances bioavailability in the human body. Alginate, a widely used gellant, singly cannot offer adequate protection to the encapsulated probiotics because the porosity of its micro-particles limits its stability in acidic conditions. Milk protein concentrate (MPC) is known to enhance gel strength. This study attempts to use chymosin treated MPC (1.0% solids w/w) as a co-gelling agent with sodium alginate (1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% solids w/w) to enhance encapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) by adopting a continuous impinging aerosol technique using CaCl2. The moisture content of microgel paste of test formulations ranged from 88.1% to 90.4% (w/w) (P>0.05). Amongst the alginate MPC composite formulations, microparticles comprising of 1.0% alginate and 1.0% MPC solids exhibited highest (P<0.05) probiotic count (7.27 log CFU/g solids) and lowest viability reduction (P<0.05). Confocal image of its microparticle illustrate the presence of live bacteria, which appear as green, rod-shaped entities, entrapped within dark gel matrix. Under simulated gastric condition of pH 2 at 37oC, its microgel particle exhibited detectable viability upto 15 minutes. In case of 1.0% alginate control microgel, comparatively higher viability was noted in the 5th minute, which was undetectable by the 10th minute. With a progressive increase in alginate concentration among test formulations, cell count decreased, suggesting milk protein positively impacted viability. Microgel of 1.0% MPC control exhibited lowest loss of viable cells (0.93 log CFU/g solids). Optical image of its microparticles appeared as large flocculate rather than spherical microgel, as observed with alginate control microparticles, suggesting MPC alone is unable to produce microgels. While this study infers better viability of microparticles comprising of 1.0 % alginate and 1.0 % MPC, it opens avenues for further research for strengthening co-gelation for probiotic survival in low pH.","PeriodicalId":34186,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"98 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54796/njb.v11i2.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria helps to protect its viability in food and enhances bioavailability in the human body. Alginate, a widely used gellant, singly cannot offer adequate protection to the encapsulated probiotics because the porosity of its micro-particles limits its stability in acidic conditions. Milk protein concentrate (MPC) is known to enhance gel strength. This study attempts to use chymosin treated MPC (1.0% solids w/w) as a co-gelling agent with sodium alginate (1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% solids w/w) to enhance encapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) by adopting a continuous impinging aerosol technique using CaCl2. The moisture content of microgel paste of test formulations ranged from 88.1% to 90.4% (w/w) (P>0.05). Amongst the alginate MPC composite formulations, microparticles comprising of 1.0% alginate and 1.0% MPC solids exhibited highest (P<0.05) probiotic count (7.27 log CFU/g solids) and lowest viability reduction (P<0.05). Confocal image of its microparticle illustrate the presence of live bacteria, which appear as green, rod-shaped entities, entrapped within dark gel matrix. Under simulated gastric condition of pH 2 at 37oC, its microgel particle exhibited detectable viability upto 15 minutes. In case of 1.0% alginate control microgel, comparatively higher viability was noted in the 5th minute, which was undetectable by the 10th minute. With a progressive increase in alginate concentration among test formulations, cell count decreased, suggesting milk protein positively impacted viability. Microgel of 1.0% MPC control exhibited lowest loss of viable cells (0.93 log CFU/g solids). Optical image of its microparticles appeared as large flocculate rather than spherical microgel, as observed with alginate control microparticles, suggesting MPC alone is unable to produce microgels. While this study infers better viability of microparticles comprising of 1.0 % alginate and 1.0 % MPC, it opens avenues for further research for strengthening co-gelation for probiotic survival in low pH.
在经糜蛋白酶处理的牛奶蛋白-海藻酸微凝胶中封装鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG
对益生菌进行封装有助于保护其在食品中的生存能力,并提高其在人体内的生物利用率。海藻酸盐是一种广泛使用的胶凝剂,由于其微颗粒的多孔性限制了其在酸性条件下的稳定性,因此单独使用海藻酸盐无法为封装的益生菌提供足够的保护。众所周知,浓缩牛奶蛋白(MPC)可增强凝胶强度。本研究尝试使用糜蛋白酶处理过的 MPC(固体含量为 1.0%(重量百分比))作为海藻酸钠(固体含量为 1.0%、1.5% 和 2.0%(重量百分比))的共胶凝剂,通过使用 CaCl2 的连续冲击气溶胶技术来增强鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(LGG)的封装。测试配方的微凝胶糊水分含量在 88.1%至 90.4%(重量比)之间(P>0.05)。在藻酸盐 MPC 复合配方中,由 1.0% 藻酸盐和 1.0% MPC 固体组成的微颗粒显示出最高的益生菌数量(P<0.05)(7.27 log CFU/g固体)和最低的存活率降低(P<0.05)。其微颗粒的共聚焦图像显示,深色凝胶基质中夹杂着活菌,呈绿色棒状。在 37 摄氏度、pH 值为 2 的模拟胃部条件下,其微凝胶颗粒可在 15 分钟内显示出可检测到的活力。在 1.0% 的海藻酸对照微凝胶中,第 5 分钟的存活率相对较高,到第 10 分钟就检测不到了。随着测试配方中海藻酸浓度的逐渐增加,细胞数量减少,这表明牛奶蛋白对细胞活力有积极影响。含 1.0% MPC 的微凝胶对照组的存活细胞损失最少(0.93 log CFU/g固体)。其微颗粒的光学图像显示为大絮状物,而不是球形微凝胶,与海藻酸对照微颗粒的观察结果一样,表明仅 MPC 无法产生微凝胶。虽然这项研究推断由 1.0 % 藻酸盐和 1.0 % MPC 组成的微颗粒具有更好的存活率,但它为进一步研究加强共凝胶作用以提高益生菌在低 pH 值环境中的存活率开辟了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信