Bio-Economic Modeling of Conventional and Organic Farming Systems in Chitwan Nepal

Nagendra Bastakoti
{"title":"Bio-Economic Modeling of Conventional and Organic Farming Systems in Chitwan Nepal","authors":"Nagendra Bastakoti","doi":"10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study in Chitwan, Nepal, aimed to compare economic and environmental factors between organic and conventional farming. Fifty-three farms (20 organic, 33 conventional) in Fulbari and Jagatpur villages of Chitwan district were surveyed for collecting data and analysis. Detailed data from 16 farms (eight from each organic and conventional farms) were used for modeling, focusing on input/output factors using linear programming. The average farm size of one hectare with sandy loam soil was selected for this analysis. An empirical analysis and a linear programming model were conducted to compare both organic and conventional farms. The model revealed that a cropping cycle involving carrots and other vegetables was key for achieving higher gross margins in both farming systems. Interestingly, a cropping cycle with 30% land allocated to legume crops showed higher variable costs and gross margins compared to one with 50% land dedicated to legume crops. Organic farming with a specific cropping cycle involving rice-broad bean-maize demonstrated superior environmental outcomes compared to the same cycle in conventional farming, particularly in terms of nitrogen and phosphorus surplus. Despite both types of farming being labor-intensive, the observed differences in labor use between organic and conventional farming were not significant for particular crops. However, when the model selected the optimal production plan, it showed that labor use was lower in organic farming than in conventional farming. The study concluded that while conventional farms exhibited higher economic performance, organic farming showcased better environmental outcomes, especially concerning nitrogen and phosphorus surplus. The continuation of organic farming is seen as crucial in supporting superior environmental performance at the farm level, rather than solely prioritizing increased production through conventional methods. To bridge the economic and environmental gap between organic and conventional farming for an optimal farm plan, further in-depth studies are essential, considering local factors such as labor availability, timely access to markets for organic products, and the specific cropping plans for optimal farm performance.","PeriodicalId":151974,"journal":{"name":"Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i12.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study in Chitwan, Nepal, aimed to compare economic and environmental factors between organic and conventional farming. Fifty-three farms (20 organic, 33 conventional) in Fulbari and Jagatpur villages of Chitwan district were surveyed for collecting data and analysis. Detailed data from 16 farms (eight from each organic and conventional farms) were used for modeling, focusing on input/output factors using linear programming. The average farm size of one hectare with sandy loam soil was selected for this analysis. An empirical analysis and a linear programming model were conducted to compare both organic and conventional farms. The model revealed that a cropping cycle involving carrots and other vegetables was key for achieving higher gross margins in both farming systems. Interestingly, a cropping cycle with 30% land allocated to legume crops showed higher variable costs and gross margins compared to one with 50% land dedicated to legume crops. Organic farming with a specific cropping cycle involving rice-broad bean-maize demonstrated superior environmental outcomes compared to the same cycle in conventional farming, particularly in terms of nitrogen and phosphorus surplus. Despite both types of farming being labor-intensive, the observed differences in labor use between organic and conventional farming were not significant for particular crops. However, when the model selected the optimal production plan, it showed that labor use was lower in organic farming than in conventional farming. The study concluded that while conventional farms exhibited higher economic performance, organic farming showcased better environmental outcomes, especially concerning nitrogen and phosphorus surplus. The continuation of organic farming is seen as crucial in supporting superior environmental performance at the farm level, rather than solely prioritizing increased production through conventional methods. To bridge the economic and environmental gap between organic and conventional farming for an optimal farm plan, further in-depth studies are essential, considering local factors such as labor availability, timely access to markets for organic products, and the specific cropping plans for optimal farm performance.
尼泊尔奇特旺常规和有机农业系统的生物经济模型
尼泊尔奇特旺的一项研究旨在比较有机耕作和传统耕作的经济和环境因素。研究人员调查了奇特旺县 Fulbari 村和 Jagatpur 村的 53 个农场(20 个有机农场,33 个常规农场),以收集数据并进行分析。16 个农场(有机农场和传统农场各 8 个)的详细数据被用于建模,重点是使用线性规划的投入/产出因素。本次分析选择了平均面积为一公顷、土壤为沙壤土的农场。通过实证分析和线性规划模型,对有机农场和传统农场进行了比较。模型显示,胡萝卜和其他蔬菜的种植周期是两种耕作制度获得较高毛利的关键。有趣的是,与 50%的土地用于种植豆类作物相比,30%的土地用于种植豆类作物的种植周期显示出更高的可变成本和毛利率。与传统耕作相比,以水稻-蚕豆-玉米为特定种植周期的有机耕作显示出更优越的环境效益,尤其是在氮和磷的盈余方面。尽管两种耕作方式都是劳动密集型的,但就特定作物而言,有机耕作和传统耕作在劳动力使用方面的差异并不显著。然而,当模型选择最佳生产计划时,它显示有机耕作的劳动力使用低于常规耕作。研究得出的结论是,虽然传统农业的经济效益更高,但有机农业的环境效益更好,尤其是在氮和磷的剩余方面。人们认为,继续开展有机耕作对于支持农场实现卓越的环境绩效至关重要,而不是仅仅优先考虑通过传统方法提高产量。为了缩小有机耕作与常规耕作之间的经济和环境差距,实现最佳的农场计划,有必要进行进一步的深入研究,考虑当地因素,如劳动力可用性、有机产品及时进入市场的机会,以及实现最佳农场绩效的具体种植计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信