The Two-Process Model: Origin of Its Concepts and Their Implications

Alexander Borbély, Irene Tobler
{"title":"The Two-Process Model: Origin of Its Concepts and Their Implications","authors":"Alexander Borbély, Irene Tobler","doi":"10.3390/ctn8010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two-process model of sleep regulation has served as a conceptual framework in the last four decades for understanding sleep physiology. In the 1970s, long-term recordings of sleep in rats were obtained thanks to EEG telemetry. NonREM sleep and REM sleep were found to differ in their time course and response to light-dark protocols. There were indications for their coupling to the circadian system, in particular the light-dark and the dark-light transitions. With the advent of quantitative EEG analysis, slow-wave activity in nonREM sleep was recognized as a sleep-wake-dependent variable. The term “sleep homeostasis” was coined to specify the regulated balance between sleep and waking. The regulatory homeostatic process was designated as “Process S”. In the two-process model, its interaction with the circadian pacemaker “Process C” can account for sleep duration under various experimental protocols. Local, use-dependent slow-wave activity changes were demonstrated in both humans and rats by the selective, unilateral activation of a cortical region prior to sleep. Finding that rest in invertebrates has sleep-like regulatory properties opened a new realm of animal studies. Comparative sleep studies in a broad variety of animal species confirmed the validity of the basic concepts of the two-process model. Recent studies have addressed sleep-related changes of brain temperature as an indicator of brain metabolism; the application of the model to Drosophila; the divergence of cortical and subcortical states; and sleep in an increasing number of species and taxa.","PeriodicalId":242430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","volume":" 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ctn8010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The two-process model of sleep regulation has served as a conceptual framework in the last four decades for understanding sleep physiology. In the 1970s, long-term recordings of sleep in rats were obtained thanks to EEG telemetry. NonREM sleep and REM sleep were found to differ in their time course and response to light-dark protocols. There were indications for their coupling to the circadian system, in particular the light-dark and the dark-light transitions. With the advent of quantitative EEG analysis, slow-wave activity in nonREM sleep was recognized as a sleep-wake-dependent variable. The term “sleep homeostasis” was coined to specify the regulated balance between sleep and waking. The regulatory homeostatic process was designated as “Process S”. In the two-process model, its interaction with the circadian pacemaker “Process C” can account for sleep duration under various experimental protocols. Local, use-dependent slow-wave activity changes were demonstrated in both humans and rats by the selective, unilateral activation of a cortical region prior to sleep. Finding that rest in invertebrates has sleep-like regulatory properties opened a new realm of animal studies. Comparative sleep studies in a broad variety of animal species confirmed the validity of the basic concepts of the two-process model. Recent studies have addressed sleep-related changes of brain temperature as an indicator of brain metabolism; the application of the model to Drosophila; the divergence of cortical and subcortical states; and sleep in an increasing number of species and taxa.
双过程模型:概念的起源及其影响
在过去的四十年中,睡眠调节的双过程模型一直是理解睡眠生理学的概念框架。20 世纪 70 年代,人们利用脑电图遥测技术获得了大鼠的长期睡眠记录。研究发现,非快速眼动睡眠和快速眼动睡眠在时间进程和对光暗方案的反应上有所不同。有迹象表明,它们与昼夜节律系统有关联,特别是明-暗和暗-明转换。随着脑电图定量分析的出现,非快速眼动睡眠中的慢波活动被认为是一种睡眠-觉醒相关变量。人们创造了 "睡眠平衡"(sleep homeostasis)这一术语,以说明睡眠和觉醒之间的调节平衡。调节平衡过程被命名为 "S 过程"。在双过程模型中,它与昼夜节律起搏器 "过程 C "的相互作用可以解释各种实验方案下的睡眠持续时间。通过在睡眠前选择性地单侧激活大脑皮层区域,在人类和大鼠身上都证明了局部的、依赖于使用的慢波活动变化。无脊椎动物的休息具有类似睡眠的调节特性,这一发现开辟了动物研究的新领域。在多种动物物种中进行的睡眠比较研究证实了双过程模型基本概念的正确性。最近的研究涉及与睡眠相关的脑温变化(作为脑新陈代谢的指标)、该模型在果蝇中的应用、皮层和皮层下状态的分化以及越来越多物种和类群的睡眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信