Transcendental Schematism and Scheme of Intelligible World. Kant and Plato

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Sententiae Pub Date : 2023-12-30 DOI:10.31649/sent03.01.003

Andrii Baumeister

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kant considers unity of aim as connected to the form of a whole, what makes impossible to reject any of its parts. Science emerges a priori as an idea which, requiring for its own realization a scheme, due to unity of the aim architectonically makes the whole possible. Scheme of science divides the whole in connection with its idea. Kant opposes science and technic, i.e. accidental efficient deeds, which cannot constitute the whole. Plato considers the One to be prior principle. Connection between the One and intelligible to the mind is indicated by scheme. Therefore, the author aims to compare two types of schematism. Need do divide the whole serves as a basis for comparison. Plato needs it to dialectically envisage scheme of division the whole. Kant – to divide the whole in connection to aim.

查看原文本刊更多论文

超验模式论与智能世界计划。康德与柏拉图

康德认为，目标的统一性与整体的形式有关，它使得不可能摒弃整体的任何部分。科学先验地产生于一种理念，这种理念的实现需要一个计划，而目标的统一性从建筑学的角度使整体成为可能。科学的方案根据其理念对整体进行划分。康德把科学和技术（即偶然的有效行为）对立起来，因为它们不能构成整体。柏拉图认为 "一 "是先验原则。计划 "表明了 "一 "与心灵可理解性之间的联系。因此，作者旨在比较两种图式主义。划分整体的必要性是比较的基础。柏拉图需要它来辩证地设想划分整体的方案。康德--根据目的划分整体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sententiae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sententiae is historico-philosophical open access journal. Journal created by Modern philosophy''s research group (Pascalian society). Founded in 2000. Published twice a year, in June and December. Our purpose is to foster the development of a wide gamut of contemporary approaches, active implementation of them into research practice, and establishment of high standards of teaching philosophy basing on the achievements of contemporary history of philosophy. Our key priority is to ensure the empirical substantiation of historico-philosophical conceptions, basing on the criteria of literality, exhaustivity, contextuality and taking into account the existing speculative interpretations. Jean-Luc Marion was the first to formulate this set of criteria in 1998 as the main features of contemporary researches of Descartes''s philosophy. We regard these principles as the methodological background of any substantiated research method in the history of philosophy. Publishing materials on all historico-philosophical topics, we pay special attention to researches in terminology, issues of philosophical translation and untranslatability, manuscript researches (including handwritten heritage of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy professors of ХVІІ–ХVІІІ century), and cover the development of large-scale projects in this area. We also publish new bilingual and commented Ukrainian translations of classical foreign philosophical texts. Among our priorities there is also a coverage of the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries and its relations to the wider cultural context (theology, literature, natural sciences, political ideology etc). The content of each issue is distributed according to Genre Sections and Thematic Headings. Currently there are 10 Genre Sections.