Effect of the Slowest Heating Zone Movement on Thermophysical Kinetics in Food Systems

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
V. Kondratenko, N. Posokina, Anna Zakharova, Aleksei Korolev, Galina Pokudina
{"title":"Effect of the Slowest Heating Zone Movement on Thermophysical Kinetics in Food Systems","authors":"V. Kondratenko, N. Posokina, Anna Zakharova, Aleksei Korolev, Galina Pokudina","doi":"10.21603/2074-9414-2023-4-2470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The slowest heating zone tends to move about in food systems with convective and predominantly convective heat transfer. If the thermocouple follows the movement, the process lethality differs from the value precalculated for a fixed thermocouple location. Hence, the heat treatment modes depend on the movement of the slowest heating zone, which should be taken into account before planning food system processes. This research aimed at identifying a statistically significant difference between lethality for fixed and moving slowest heating zones in various food systems. The study involved four homophasic and heterophasic model food systems. Food System 1 was heterophase, with a dispersed phase not involved in convection and a liquid dispersion medium of aqueous solution with 1.5% sucrose and 1.5% NaCl. Food System 2 was heterophase, with a dispersed phase not involved in convection and a liquid dispersion medium of 11% aqueous sucrose solution. Food System 3 was represented by homophase reconstituted clarified baby-food apple juice with 11.2% soluble solids. Food System 4 was a heterophase model system, represented by reconstituted baby-food apple juice with pulp and 11.2% soluble solids with a dispersed phase involved in convection. The temperature changes were monitored using the E-ValPro multichannel system and the SSA-TS model temperature sensors. The temperature sensors were fixed inside the jar with the food system. Food System 1 showed no significant differences in lethality. Other model systems had sterilization temperature intervals when the difference in lethality was statistically significant. However, this difference was very small for Food Systems 2 and 3. The largest difference belonged to Food System 4, where the dispersed phase was involved in the convective flow. In this research, a statistically significant difference in lethality for fixed and moving slowest heating zones occurred only in heterophase food systems with convective and predominantly convective heat exchange, where the dispersed phase was involved in the convection flow. This fact must be taken into account when identifying heat treatment modes for such food systems.","PeriodicalId":12335,"journal":{"name":"Food Processing: Techniques and Technology","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Processing: Techniques and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2023-4-2470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The slowest heating zone tends to move about in food systems with convective and predominantly convective heat transfer. If the thermocouple follows the movement, the process lethality differs from the value precalculated for a fixed thermocouple location. Hence, the heat treatment modes depend on the movement of the slowest heating zone, which should be taken into account before planning food system processes. This research aimed at identifying a statistically significant difference between lethality for fixed and moving slowest heating zones in various food systems. The study involved four homophasic and heterophasic model food systems. Food System 1 was heterophase, with a dispersed phase not involved in convection and a liquid dispersion medium of aqueous solution with 1.5% sucrose and 1.5% NaCl. Food System 2 was heterophase, with a dispersed phase not involved in convection and a liquid dispersion medium of 11% aqueous sucrose solution. Food System 3 was represented by homophase reconstituted clarified baby-food apple juice with 11.2% soluble solids. Food System 4 was a heterophase model system, represented by reconstituted baby-food apple juice with pulp and 11.2% soluble solids with a dispersed phase involved in convection. The temperature changes were monitored using the E-ValPro multichannel system and the SSA-TS model temperature sensors. The temperature sensors were fixed inside the jar with the food system. Food System 1 showed no significant differences in lethality. Other model systems had sterilization temperature intervals when the difference in lethality was statistically significant. However, this difference was very small for Food Systems 2 and 3. The largest difference belonged to Food System 4, where the dispersed phase was involved in the convective flow. In this research, a statistically significant difference in lethality for fixed and moving slowest heating zones occurred only in heterophase food systems with convective and predominantly convective heat exchange, where the dispersed phase was involved in the convection flow. This fact must be taken into account when identifying heat treatment modes for such food systems.
最慢加热区运动对食品系统热物理动力学的影响
在以对流传热和主要以对流传热为主的食品系统中,加热最慢的区域往往会移动。如果热电偶跟随移动,则过程致死率与热电偶位置固定时的预计算值不同。因此,热处理模式取决于最慢加热区的移动,在规划食品系统工艺之前应考虑到这一点。这项研究旨在确定在各种食品系统中,固定最慢加热区和移动最慢加热区的致死率在统计学上的显著差异。 研究涉及四个同相和异相模型食品系统。食品系统 1 为异相,分散相不参与对流,液体分散介质为含 1.5% 蔗糖和 1.5% 氯化钠的水溶液。食物系统 2 为异相,分散相不参与对流,液体分散介质为 11%的蔗糖水溶液。食物系统 3 是同相的澄清婴儿食品苹果汁,可溶性固体含量为 11.2%。食物系统 4 是一个异相模型系统,由含有果肉和 11.2%可溶性固体的再造婴幼儿苹果汁和参与对流的分散相组成。使用 E-ValPro 多通道系统和 SSA-TS 型温度传感器监测温度变化。温度传感器与食品系统一起固定在罐内。 食物系统 1 在致死率方面无明显差异。其他模型系统的灭菌温度间隔在统计学上有显著的致死率差异。不过,食物系统 2 和 3 的差异非常小。差异最大的是食品系统 4,因为该系统中的分散相参与了对流。 在这项研究中,只有在对流和主要是对流热交换的异相食品系统中,分散相参与对流时,固定加热区和移动最慢加热区的致死率才会出现统计学上的显著差异。在确定此类食品系统的热处理模式时,必须考虑到这一事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Processing: Techniques and Technology
Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信