Assessment of antibiotic resistant profile of coliform and Staphylococcus spp. isolated from milk from Kathmandu valley

Soniya Bohora, Suraj Chaulagai, Suchitra Thapa
{"title":"Assessment of antibiotic resistant profile of coliform and Staphylococcus spp. isolated from milk from Kathmandu valley","authors":"Soniya Bohora, Suraj Chaulagai, Suchitra Thapa","doi":"10.54796/njb.v11i2.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among milk pathogens is increasing, which is a serious threat to consumers’ health. Therefore, this study aims to assess the current antibiotic profile of coliforms and Staphylococcus spp. in milk samples. For this, thirty milk samples were collected from various locations in Kathmandu district. Isolation and enumeration were done on selective media using streak-plate and pour-plate techniques, respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was done by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. A total of 48 bacteria were isolated, of which 31 were coliform and 17 Staphylococcus spp. Among the coliforms, Klebsiella spp. (n=17, 54.84%) was the most predominant in both raw (n=12, 70.6%) and pasteurized milk (n=5, 29.4%), followed by E. coli and Citrobacter spp. While for Staphylococcus spp., 15 (88.24%) were S. aureus and 2 (11.76%) were coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS). S. aureus was dominant in raw milk (n=13) rather than pasteurized milk (n=2). The AST of coliforms showed higher resistance towards ampicillin (96.75%), followed by cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, piperacillin, co-trimoxazole, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and amikacin in descending order. In the case of S. aureus, higher resistance was observed for penicillin G (100.00%), followed by cefoxitin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Further, 12 (70.53%) S. aureus were confirmed as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). And a total of 10 (32.25%) coliforms and 9 (52.95%) S. aureus were identified as multiple drug resistant (MDR) strains. Thus, it can be concluded that antibiotic resistance among milk isolates of the coliform and Staphylococcus spp. is highly prevalent, and these can be a potential source of incurable milk-borne infections. Thus, routine assessment of microbial quality as well as AMR surveillance should be done on milk isolates to ensure the safety of consumer’s health.","PeriodicalId":34186,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54796/njb.v11i2.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among milk pathogens is increasing, which is a serious threat to consumers’ health. Therefore, this study aims to assess the current antibiotic profile of coliforms and Staphylococcus spp. in milk samples. For this, thirty milk samples were collected from various locations in Kathmandu district. Isolation and enumeration were done on selective media using streak-plate and pour-plate techniques, respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was done by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. A total of 48 bacteria were isolated, of which 31 were coliform and 17 Staphylococcus spp. Among the coliforms, Klebsiella spp. (n=17, 54.84%) was the most predominant in both raw (n=12, 70.6%) and pasteurized milk (n=5, 29.4%), followed by E. coli and Citrobacter spp. While for Staphylococcus spp., 15 (88.24%) were S. aureus and 2 (11.76%) were coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS). S. aureus was dominant in raw milk (n=13) rather than pasteurized milk (n=2). The AST of coliforms showed higher resistance towards ampicillin (96.75%), followed by cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, piperacillin, co-trimoxazole, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, and amikacin in descending order. In the case of S. aureus, higher resistance was observed for penicillin G (100.00%), followed by cefoxitin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Further, 12 (70.53%) S. aureus were confirmed as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). And a total of 10 (32.25%) coliforms and 9 (52.95%) S. aureus were identified as multiple drug resistant (MDR) strains. Thus, it can be concluded that antibiotic resistance among milk isolates of the coliform and Staphylococcus spp. is highly prevalent, and these can be a potential source of incurable milk-borne infections. Thus, routine assessment of microbial quality as well as AMR surveillance should be done on milk isolates to ensure the safety of consumer’s health.
评估从加德满都谷地牛奶中分离出的大肠菌群和葡萄球菌的抗生素耐药性情况
牛奶病原体的抗菌药耐药性(AMR)正在不断增加,严重威胁着消费者的健康。因此,本研究旨在评估目前牛奶样本中大肠菌群和葡萄球菌的抗生素概况。为此,研究人员从加德满都地区的不同地点采集了 30 份牛奶样本。分别使用条纹板和倒平板技术在选择性培养基上进行分离和计数。抗生素药敏试验(AST)采用柯比鲍尔盘扩散法进行。在大肠菌群中,克雷伯氏菌(17 个,占 54.84%)在生乳(12 个,占 70.6%)和巴氏杀菌乳(5 个,占 29.4%)中最多,其次是大肠杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌。 至于葡萄球菌、15个(88.24%)为金黄色葡萄球菌,2个(11.76%)为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CONS)。金黄色葡萄球菌在生奶(13 个)中占优势,而在巴氏杀菌奶(2 个)中占优势。大肠菌群的 AST 对氨苄西林的耐药性较高(96.75%),其次依次是头孢西丁、环丙沙星、萘啶酸、硝基呋喃妥因、哌拉西林、联合曲唑、头孢曲松、氯霉素和阿米卡星。在金黄色葡萄球菌中,青霉素 G 的耐药性较高(100.00%),其次是头孢西丁、氨苄西林、头孢曲松、四环素、环丙沙星和阿米卡星。此外,12 例(70.53%)金黄色葡萄球菌被确认为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。共有 10 个(32.25%)大肠菌群和 9 个(52.95%)金黄色葡萄球菌被鉴定为多重耐药菌株。因此,可以得出结论,牛奶中大肠菌群和葡萄球菌属分离物的抗生素耐药性非常普遍,这些菌株可能成为无法治愈的奶源性感染的潜在来源。因此,应对牛奶分离物进行微生物质量常规评估和 AMR 监测,以确保消费者的健康安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信