(Im)Politeness in Dialogues between some Prophets and the Polytheists in the Noble Qur'an:

Islam Sorour, Maha Zaghloul, Amany Youssef
{"title":"(Im)Politeness in Dialogues between some Prophets and the Polytheists in the Noble Qur'an:","authors":"Islam Sorour, Maha Zaghloul, Amany Youssef","doi":"10.54848/bjtll.v3i4.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a pragmatic analysis of linguistic Politeness and Impoliteness in dialogues between six prophets (Nuh, Hud, Salih, Ibrahim, Shuaib and Musa) and their contemporaneous polytheists in the Noble Qur'an. The data comprises 35 dialogues from 20 surahs which revolve around how the prophets talked to the polytheists to persuade them to believe in the Oneness of Allah and in the Last Day and how the polytheists reacted to the prophets’ call for faith. The analytical framework comprises Leech's (1983) Maxims of Politeness, Brown and Levinson's (1978, 1987) Theory of Politeness, and Culpeper's (1996; 2005 and 2011) Model of Impoliteness. Within a mixed approach, the qualitative analysis has revealed how the prophets have been modest, sympathetic and close to their communities while guiding them to true Monotheism. In addition, the study shows how the polytheists have reacted impolitely to the prophets’ call for faith. The quantitative analysis has revealed that the six maxims of politeness have been present in the prophets’ utterances, with the Tact, Modesty and Sympathy Maxims as the most prominent. Moreover, the four strategies of politeness (Bald on record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness and Off-record) have been evident in the utterances of the prophets. On the other hand, all five strategies of impoliteness (Bald on record, Positive Impoliteness, Negative Impoliteness, Sarcasm or Mock Politeness and Off-record) have been employed in the polytheists’ utterances. Most significantly, the study proposes Mercy, as a potential addition to the maxims of performing Politeness. Mercy, in the form of non-reciprocal forgiveness and pity, was prevalent in the prophets’ communication with their contemporaneous people. The prophets were the finest of creation as Allah (God) chose them over humanity in order to convey the message of true Monotheism.","PeriodicalId":241858,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Translation, Linguistics and Literature","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Translation, Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54848/bjtll.v3i4.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a pragmatic analysis of linguistic Politeness and Impoliteness in dialogues between six prophets (Nuh, Hud, Salih, Ibrahim, Shuaib and Musa) and their contemporaneous polytheists in the Noble Qur'an. The data comprises 35 dialogues from 20 surahs which revolve around how the prophets talked to the polytheists to persuade them to believe in the Oneness of Allah and in the Last Day and how the polytheists reacted to the prophets’ call for faith. The analytical framework comprises Leech's (1983) Maxims of Politeness, Brown and Levinson's (1978, 1987) Theory of Politeness, and Culpeper's (1996; 2005 and 2011) Model of Impoliteness. Within a mixed approach, the qualitative analysis has revealed how the prophets have been modest, sympathetic and close to their communities while guiding them to true Monotheism. In addition, the study shows how the polytheists have reacted impolitely to the prophets’ call for faith. The quantitative analysis has revealed that the six maxims of politeness have been present in the prophets’ utterances, with the Tact, Modesty and Sympathy Maxims as the most prominent. Moreover, the four strategies of politeness (Bald on record, Positive Politeness, Negative Politeness and Off-record) have been evident in the utterances of the prophets. On the other hand, all five strategies of impoliteness (Bald on record, Positive Impoliteness, Negative Impoliteness, Sarcasm or Mock Politeness and Off-record) have been employed in the polytheists’ utterances. Most significantly, the study proposes Mercy, as a potential addition to the maxims of performing Politeness. Mercy, in the form of non-reciprocal forgiveness and pity, was prevalent in the prophets’ communication with their contemporaneous people. The prophets were the finest of creation as Allah (God) chose them over humanity in order to convey the message of true Monotheism.
尊贵的古兰经》中一些先知与多神教徒对话中的(不)礼貌:
本研究对《古兰经》中六位先知(努赫、胡德、萨利赫、易卜拉欣、舒艾布和穆萨)与其同时代的多神教徒对话中的礼貌和不礼貌进行了语用学分析。数据包括 20 段经文中的 35 段对话,内容围绕先知如何与多神教徒对话,劝说他们相信真主的独一性和末日,以及多神教徒如何回应先知的信仰号召。分析框架包括 Leech(1983 年)的礼貌格言、Brown 和 Levinson(1978 年、1987 年)的礼貌理论以及 Culpeper(1996 年、2005 年和 2011 年)的无礼模型。在混合方法中,定性分析揭示了先知们如何谦虚、富有同情心和亲近他们的族群,同时引导他们信奉真正的一神论。此外,研究还显示了多神教徒如何对先知的信仰号召做出无礼的反应。定量分析显示,先知的言论中包含六条礼貌格言,其中以 "机智"、"谦虚 "和 "同情 "格言最为突出。此外,四种礼貌策略("记录在案"、"积极礼貌"、"消极礼貌 "和 "不记录在案")在先知的话语中也很明显。另一方面,所有五种无礼策略(记录在案的光头、积极的无礼、消极的无礼、讽刺或嘲讽的无礼和不记录在案的无礼)都在多神论者的话语中得到了运用。最重要的是,本研究建议将 "仁慈 "作为执行礼貌格言的潜在补充。以非互惠的宽恕和怜悯为形式的 "仁慈 "在先知与同时代人的交流中十分普遍。先知们是最优秀的造物主,因为安拉(真主)在人类中选择了他们,以传达真正的一神论的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信