Influence of Fluid Rheology on Blood Flow Haemodynamics in Patient-Specific Arterial Networks of Varied Complexity – In-Silico Studies

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Zbigniew Tyfa, P. Reorowicz, D. Obidowski, K. Jóźwik
{"title":"Influence of Fluid Rheology on Blood Flow Haemodynamics in Patient-Specific Arterial Networks of Varied Complexity – In-Silico Studies","authors":"Zbigniew Tyfa, P. Reorowicz, D. Obidowski, K. Jóźwik","doi":"10.2478/ama-2024-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Results obtained with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) rely on assumptions made during a pre-processing stage, including a mathematical description of a fluid rheology. Up to this date there is no clear answer to several aspects, mainly related to the question of whether and under what conditions blood can be simplified to a Newtonian fluid during CFD analyses. Different research groups present contradictory results, leaving the question unanswered. Therefore, the objective of this research was to perform steady-state and pulsatile blood flow simulations using eight different rheological models in geometries of varying complexity. A qualitative comparison of shear- and viscosity-related parameters showed no meaningful discrepancies, but a quantitative analysis revealed significant differences, especially in the magnitudes of wall shear stress (WSS) and its gradient (WSSG). We suggest that for the large arteries blood should be modelled as a non-Newtonian fluid, whereas for the cerebral vasculature the assumption of blood as a simple Newtonian fluid can be treated as a valid simplification.","PeriodicalId":44942,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica et Automatica","volume":" 8","pages":"8 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica et Automatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2024-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Results obtained with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) rely on assumptions made during a pre-processing stage, including a mathematical description of a fluid rheology. Up to this date there is no clear answer to several aspects, mainly related to the question of whether and under what conditions blood can be simplified to a Newtonian fluid during CFD analyses. Different research groups present contradictory results, leaving the question unanswered. Therefore, the objective of this research was to perform steady-state and pulsatile blood flow simulations using eight different rheological models in geometries of varying complexity. A qualitative comparison of shear- and viscosity-related parameters showed no meaningful discrepancies, but a quantitative analysis revealed significant differences, especially in the magnitudes of wall shear stress (WSS) and its gradient (WSSG). We suggest that for the large arteries blood should be modelled as a non-Newtonian fluid, whereas for the cerebral vasculature the assumption of blood as a simple Newtonian fluid can be treated as a valid simplification.
流体流变学对患者特定复杂动脉网络中血流血流动力学的影响--模拟研究
摘要 计算流体动力学(CFD)的结果取决于预处理阶段的假设,包括流体流变学的数学描述。到目前为止,有几个方面还没有明确的答案,主要涉及在 CFD 分析过程中,血液是否可以简化为牛顿流体,以及在什么条件下可以简化为牛顿流体。不同的研究小组得出了相互矛盾的结果,使这一问题悬而未决。因此,本研究的目的是在不同复杂程度的几何结构中使用八种不同的流变模型进行稳态和脉动血流模拟。对剪切力和粘度相关参数的定性比较没有发现有意义的差异,但定量分析发现存在显著差异,尤其是在壁剪应力(WSS)及其梯度(WSSG)的大小方面。我们建议将大动脉中的血液模拟为非牛顿流体,而将脑血管中的血液模拟为简单的牛顿流体则是一种有效的简化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica et Automatica
Acta Mechanica et Automatica ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信