Comparative Evaluation of Durability and Hygiene Between Multistrand Round Dead Soft and 8-Braid Flat Dead Soft Stainless Steel Retainer Wire

Nitu Gautam, S. Nanda, T. K. Nayak, Sumita Mishra, Saibalini Pani, Debapratim Jana
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Durability and Hygiene Between Multistrand Round Dead Soft and 8-Braid Flat Dead Soft Stainless Steel Retainer Wire","authors":"Nitu Gautam, S. Nanda, T. K. Nayak, Sumita Mishra, Saibalini Pani, Debapratim Jana","doi":"10.1177/03015742231214380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims at evaluation and comparison of durability and hygiene between 2 different lingual retainer wires bonded between premolar to premolar, that is, maxillary or mandibular arch in the same patient. Eighty retainer wires were placed in 40 patients. They were assigned to 2 groups and subjected to 2 different types of retainer wires (multistrand round and 8-braid flat). The mean durability of multistrand round retainer wire (235.7 ± 67.28 days) was more than 8-braid flat retainer wire (153.5 ± 43.85 days) irrespective of arches to which they were bonded, which was statistically significant. Scores for plaque index, calculus index, and gingival index were found more with 8-braid flat retainers and in lower arch than multistrand round retainer and in upper arch but these are statistically not significant. The mean durability of multistrand round retainer wire was more than 8-braid flat retainer wire. The analysis did not find any statistical significant association for deposition of plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation between different retainer wires and between arches.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231214380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims at evaluation and comparison of durability and hygiene between 2 different lingual retainer wires bonded between premolar to premolar, that is, maxillary or mandibular arch in the same patient. Eighty retainer wires were placed in 40 patients. They were assigned to 2 groups and subjected to 2 different types of retainer wires (multistrand round and 8-braid flat). The mean durability of multistrand round retainer wire (235.7 ± 67.28 days) was more than 8-braid flat retainer wire (153.5 ± 43.85 days) irrespective of arches to which they were bonded, which was statistically significant. Scores for plaque index, calculus index, and gingival index were found more with 8-braid flat retainers and in lower arch than multistrand round retainer and in upper arch but these are statistically not significant. The mean durability of multistrand round retainer wire was more than 8-braid flat retainer wire. The analysis did not find any statistical significant association for deposition of plaque, calculus, and gingival inflammation between different retainer wires and between arches.
多股圆形软性和 8 编扁平软性不锈钢保持器钢丝耐久性和卫生性的比较评估
本研究旨在评估和比较粘结在前磨牙与前磨牙(即同一患者的上颌或下颌牙弓)之间的两种不同舌侧保持架钢丝的耐用性和卫生状况。我们为 40 名患者安装了 80 个保持器钢丝。他们被分为两组,分别使用两种不同类型的保持器钢丝(多股圆形钢丝和八股扁形钢丝)。无论粘结在哪个牙弓上,多丝圆形保持器钢丝的平均耐久性(235.7 ± 67.28 天)均高于 8 排扁平保持器钢丝(153.5 ± 43.85 天),这在统计学上具有显著意义。在牙菌斑指数、牙结石指数和牙龈指数方面,下牙弓使用 8 排扁平保持器的得分高于上牙弓使用多排圆形保持器的得分,但在统计学上没有意义。多排圆形保持器钢丝的平均耐用度高于 8 排扁平保持器钢丝。分析没有发现不同保持器钢丝和不同牙弓之间在牙菌斑沉积、牙结石和牙龈炎症方面有任何统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信