Agreement on legal assistance: legal regulation of the “success fee” in the Republic of Kazakhstan

S. Zhamburbayeva
{"title":"Agreement on legal assistance: legal regulation of the “success fee” in the Republic of Kazakhstan","authors":"S. Zhamburbayeva","doi":"10.31489/2023l4/112-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the current legal regulation of the contract for the provision of legal as- sistance in the Republic of Kazakhstan, namely, the prohibition of the legislator on contracts that make the amount of payment for legal assistance provided by advocates dependent on the outcome of the case or the success of advocacy, also referred to as “success fees”, or contracts under which the lawyer receives part of the awarded amount. The paper draws attention to the difference between the regulation of the procedure for concluding paid contracts by advocates / lawyers and legal consultants, despite the fact that these subjects are equally admitted by the legislator to representation in civil proceedings. The author conducted a study and analysis of the opinions of various authors in order to understand the possible reasons for such a categorical point of view of the legislator in relation to the “success fee”, a comparative analysis is carried out between the norms of the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic systems of law in relation to this type of payment for services and remuneration, and also assesses the risk of the principal's refusal to fulfill his duty to payment for services rendered by a representative after receiving the desired positive result. In order to improve the Law “On Advocacy and Legal Assistance”, the author summarizes the need to introduce appropriate positive changes.","PeriodicalId":302577,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2023l4/112-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the current legal regulation of the contract for the provision of legal as- sistance in the Republic of Kazakhstan, namely, the prohibition of the legislator on contracts that make the amount of payment for legal assistance provided by advocates dependent on the outcome of the case or the success of advocacy, also referred to as “success fees”, or contracts under which the lawyer receives part of the awarded amount. The paper draws attention to the difference between the regulation of the procedure for concluding paid contracts by advocates / lawyers and legal consultants, despite the fact that these subjects are equally admitted by the legislator to representation in civil proceedings. The author conducted a study and analysis of the opinions of various authors in order to understand the possible reasons for such a categorical point of view of the legislator in relation to the “success fee”, a comparative analysis is carried out between the norms of the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic systems of law in relation to this type of payment for services and remuneration, and also assesses the risk of the principal's refusal to fulfill his duty to payment for services rendered by a representative after receiving the desired positive result. In order to improve the Law “On Advocacy and Legal Assistance”, the author summarizes the need to introduce appropriate positive changes.
法律援助协定:哈萨克斯坦共和国关于 "成功费 "的法律规定
本文致力于研究哈萨克斯坦共和国关于提供法律援助合同的现行法律规定,即立法者禁止律师提供法律援助的付款金额取决于案件结果或辩护成功与否的合同,也称为 "成功费",或律师收取部分赔偿金的合同。本文提请注意对辩护人/律师和法律顾问签订有偿合同的程序规定之间的差异,尽管立法者同样允许这些主体在民事诉讼中担任代理。作者对不同作者的观点进行了研究和分析,以了解立法者对 "成功酬金 "持如此明确观点的可能原因,并对盎格鲁-撒克逊法系和罗马-日耳曼法系有关此类服务和报酬付款的规范进行了比较分析,同时还评估了委托人在收到预期的积极结果后拒绝履行其对代理人所提供服务付款的义务的风险。为了完善 "辩护与法律援助 "法,作者总结了进行适当积极改革的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信