Abstract law and actual reality: social critique from F. Poullain de la Barre to Charles Fourier

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Sententiae Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.31649/sent05.01.130

Olena Slobodianuk

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article compares the views of François Poullain de la Barre and Charles Fourier on gender equality. The research is based on the background of historical and philosophical transformations associated with the transition from Cartesian rationalism to enlightenment and post-enlightenment thinking. The latter focuses primarily on social criticism and human transformation through the transformation of social relations. Although the author states that some of the provisions of French philosophers have a common origin (the ideological potential of Cartesianism and the modern doctrine of natural law), they interpret the target aspect differently. While Poullain de la Barre seeks to prove the identity of men's and women's abilities, Fourier's task is to find practical grounds that will allow for real equality of the sexes. In addition, the degree of equality achieved by women is derived from the degree of overcoming social (in particular, economic) injustice in general.

查看原文本刊更多论文

抽象法律与现实：从 F. Poullain de la Barre 到 Charles Fourier 的社会批判

文章比较了弗朗索瓦-普兰-德拉巴雷（François Poullain de la Barre）和查尔斯-傅立叶（Charles Fourier）关于性别平等的观点。研究以历史和哲学变革为背景，这些变革与笛卡尔理性主义向启蒙思想和后启蒙思想的过渡有关。后启蒙思想主要侧重于社会批判和通过社会关系变革实现人类转型。尽管作者指出法国哲学家的某些规定具有共同的起源（笛卡尔主义的思想潜能和现代自然法学说），但他们对目标方面的解释却各不相同。普兰-德-拉-巴雷（Poullain de la Barre）试图证明男女能力的同一性，而傅立叶的任务则是找到真正实现男女平等的实际依据。此外，妇女实现平等的程度来自于克服社会（尤其是经济）不公正的程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sententiae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sententiae is historico-philosophical open access journal. Journal created by Modern philosophy''s research group (Pascalian society). Founded in 2000. Published twice a year, in June and December. Our purpose is to foster the development of a wide gamut of contemporary approaches, active implementation of them into research practice, and establishment of high standards of teaching philosophy basing on the achievements of contemporary history of philosophy. Our key priority is to ensure the empirical substantiation of historico-philosophical conceptions, basing on the criteria of literality, exhaustivity, contextuality and taking into account the existing speculative interpretations. Jean-Luc Marion was the first to formulate this set of criteria in 1998 as the main features of contemporary researches of Descartes''s philosophy. We regard these principles as the methodological background of any substantiated research method in the history of philosophy. Publishing materials on all historico-philosophical topics, we pay special attention to researches in terminology, issues of philosophical translation and untranslatability, manuscript researches (including handwritten heritage of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy professors of ХVІІ–ХVІІІ century), and cover the development of large-scale projects in this area. We also publish new bilingual and commented Ukrainian translations of classical foreign philosophical texts. Among our priorities there is also a coverage of the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries and its relations to the wider cultural context (theology, literature, natural sciences, political ideology etc). The content of each issue is distributed according to Genre Sections and Thematic Headings. Currently there are 10 Genre Sections.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格