The Unprovability of Utility and Utility as a Moral Feeling

Gwangyeon Kim
{"title":"The Unprovability of Utility and Utility as a Moral Feeling","authors":"Gwangyeon Kim","doi":"10.35222/ihsu.2023.42.4.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers regard the human desire for happiness as an instinctive act, and utilitarians also say that the desire for happiness is a ‘principle of nature’ given ‘from the beginning.’ J. Bentham and J. S. Mill say that it is natural for humans to pursue utility. They say that axioms as principles of nature are unprovable. If the majority of people only consider their own interests, the community will turn into a selfish society. Even though the attitude of humans pursuing utility is a principles of nature, if we remain in that state, the community will become a society that pursues only private utility. Accordingly, this article first discusses axioms as natural principles. This paper then points out the limitations that appear when the pursuit of utility remains limited to the pursuit of individual interests. Additionally, this article suggests the need to move beyond axioms based on natural feeling to utility based on social feeling. Axioms based on social feeling is utility pursued by individuals as moral beings. Lastly, this article presents the role of the individual as a ‘moral being’ and the direction for public utility.","PeriodicalId":271713,"journal":{"name":"The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University","volume":" 1273","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Institute of Humanities at Soonchunhyang University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35222/ihsu.2023.42.4.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophers regard the human desire for happiness as an instinctive act, and utilitarians also say that the desire for happiness is a ‘principle of nature’ given ‘from the beginning.’ J. Bentham and J. S. Mill say that it is natural for humans to pursue utility. They say that axioms as principles of nature are unprovable. If the majority of people only consider their own interests, the community will turn into a selfish society. Even though the attitude of humans pursuing utility is a principles of nature, if we remain in that state, the community will become a society that pursues only private utility. Accordingly, this article first discusses axioms as natural principles. This paper then points out the limitations that appear when the pursuit of utility remains limited to the pursuit of individual interests. Additionally, this article suggests the need to move beyond axioms based on natural feeling to utility based on social feeling. Axioms based on social feeling is utility pursued by individuals as moral beings. Lastly, this article presents the role of the individual as a ‘moral being’ and the direction for public utility.
功利的不可取性和作为道德情感的功利性
哲学家认为人类对幸福的渴望是一种本能行为,功利主义者也说,对幸福的渴望是'从一开始'就有的'自然原则'。J. Bentham 和 J. S. Mill 说,追求功利是人类的天性。他们说,作为自然原则的公理是无法证明的。如果大多数人只考虑自己的利益,社会就会变成一个自私自利的社会。尽管人类追求效用的态度是自然原则,但如果我们仍然处于这种状态,社会就会变成一个只追求私人效用的社会。 因此,本文首先讨论了作为自然原则的公理。然后,本文指出了当追求效用仍然局限于追求个人利益时所出现的局限性。此外,本文认为有必要超越基于自然感受的公理,转而追求基于社会感受的效用。基于社会情感的公理是个人作为道德存在所追求的效用。最后,本文提出了个人作为 "道德存在 "的作用以及公共效用的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信