Analytical philosophy of G.E. Moore: neomodern as a restoration of the philosophical guidelines of modern

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Sententiae Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.31649/sent12.01.177

O. Panych

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author argues that the philosophical and cultural origins of analytic philosophy can be determined through its connection with the Enlightenment, but this thesis should not be accepted without reservations. The position of analytic philosophy in the context of scientism is not absolute. In particular, Moore is in "open conflict" with scientism and "all forms of skepticism." According to the author, this conflict is a consequence of the Enlightenment roots of analytic philosophy. The article compares the strategies of antiskeptic polemics of Thomas Reed and George Edward Moore, in particular, their attitude to common sense and criteria of truth. The conclusion of this comparison is the thesis that the crisis of the philosophy of common sense is inevitable both in case of its failure and in case of complete success. The author claims that the attempt to combine philosophy and common sense can ultimately lead to the self-destruction of philosophy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

G.E. 摩尔的分析哲学：恢复现代哲学准则的新现代哲学

作者认为，可以通过分析哲学与启蒙运动的联系来确定分析哲学的哲学和文化渊源，但不能毫无保留地接受这一论点。分析哲学在科学主义背景下的地位并非绝对。特别是，摩尔与科学主义和 "一切形式的怀疑主义 "存在着 "公开的冲突"。作者认为，这种冲突是分析哲学的启蒙根源造成的。文章比较了托马斯-里德和乔治-爱德华-摩尔反怀疑论战的策略，特别是他们对常识和真理标准的态度。比较的结论是，常识哲学的危机在其失败和完全成功的情况下都是不可避免的。作者声称，将哲学与常识结合起来的尝试最终会导致哲学的自我毁灭。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sententiae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sententiae is historico-philosophical open access journal. Journal created by Modern philosophy''s research group (Pascalian society). Founded in 2000. Published twice a year, in June and December. Our purpose is to foster the development of a wide gamut of contemporary approaches, active implementation of them into research practice, and establishment of high standards of teaching philosophy basing on the achievements of contemporary history of philosophy. Our key priority is to ensure the empirical substantiation of historico-philosophical conceptions, basing on the criteria of literality, exhaustivity, contextuality and taking into account the existing speculative interpretations. Jean-Luc Marion was the first to formulate this set of criteria in 1998 as the main features of contemporary researches of Descartes''s philosophy. We regard these principles as the methodological background of any substantiated research method in the history of philosophy. Publishing materials on all historico-philosophical topics, we pay special attention to researches in terminology, issues of philosophical translation and untranslatability, manuscript researches (including handwritten heritage of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy professors of ХVІІ–ХVІІІ century), and cover the development of large-scale projects in this area. We also publish new bilingual and commented Ukrainian translations of classical foreign philosophical texts. Among our priorities there is also a coverage of the history of philosophical thought in Ukraine and other Eastern European countries and its relations to the wider cultural context (theology, literature, natural sciences, political ideology etc). The content of each issue is distributed according to Genre Sections and Thematic Headings. Currently there are 10 Genre Sections.