The effectiveness of Moodle's “Lesson” feature in pre-learning about arterial puncture and blood transfusion procedures

Haeyoung Lee, Sang-Shin Lee, Hyunyong Hwang
{"title":"The effectiveness of Moodle's “Lesson” feature in pre-learning about arterial puncture and blood transfusion procedures","authors":"Haeyoung Lee, Sang-Shin Lee, Hyunyong Hwang","doi":"10.7180/kmj.23.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Moodle’s “Lesson” feature as a pre-learning tool for clinical skills among medical students. Methods: The performance of 69 fourth-year medical students during practical sessions on arterial puncture and blood transfusion was assessed. These students engaged in pre-learning activities via Moodle's “Lesson” feature. We analyzed the survey results to gauge students’ satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the pre-learning approach. Additionally, we compared the performance of the 2023 cohort, which took part in the pre-learning process, with students from 2020 to 2022 who did not have this preparatory component.Results: Among the students surveyed, data from 59 respondents were analyzed. Satisfaction with the pre-learning segment was high, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.69 (standard deviation [SD]=0.62) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.918. The tool's perceived usefulness was also rated highly, with a mean score of 4.77 (SD=0.53) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.956. Students who used the pre-learning tool had a mean score of 84.20 (SD=14.74), whereas those who did not use the tool scored slightly lower, with a mean of 80.40 (SD=13.07); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Nonetheless, the 2023 cohort scores were generally higher across the various percentile measures than those of the 2020–2022 groups.Conclusions: The pre-learning tool using the “Lesson” feature on Moodle proved useful and satisfactory for students learning clinical procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":53015,"journal":{"name":"Kosin Medical Journal","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.23.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Moodle’s “Lesson” feature as a pre-learning tool for clinical skills among medical students. Methods: The performance of 69 fourth-year medical students during practical sessions on arterial puncture and blood transfusion was assessed. These students engaged in pre-learning activities via Moodle's “Lesson” feature. We analyzed the survey results to gauge students’ satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the pre-learning approach. Additionally, we compared the performance of the 2023 cohort, which took part in the pre-learning process, with students from 2020 to 2022 who did not have this preparatory component.Results: Among the students surveyed, data from 59 respondents were analyzed. Satisfaction with the pre-learning segment was high, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.69 (standard deviation [SD]=0.62) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.918. The tool's perceived usefulness was also rated highly, with a mean score of 4.77 (SD=0.53) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.956. Students who used the pre-learning tool had a mean score of 84.20 (SD=14.74), whereas those who did not use the tool scored slightly lower, with a mean of 80.40 (SD=13.07); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Nonetheless, the 2023 cohort scores were generally higher across the various percentile measures than those of the 2020–2022 groups.Conclusions: The pre-learning tool using the “Lesson” feature on Moodle proved useful and satisfactory for students learning clinical procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate these findings.
Moodle 的 "课程 "功能在动脉穿刺和输血程序预习中的有效性
研究背景本研究评估了 Moodle 的 "课程 "功能作为医学生临床技能预习工具的有效性。研究方法评估了 69 名四年级医学生在动脉穿刺和输血实践课程中的表现。这些学生通过 Moodle 的 "课程 "功能参与了预习活动。我们对调查结果进行了分析,以了解学生对预习方法的满意度和实用性。此外,我们还将参加预习过程的 2023 届学生的成绩与没有参加预习的 2020 至 2022 届学生的成绩进行了比较:在接受调查的学生中,我们对 59 名受访者的数据进行了分析。对预习环节的满意度很高,平均满意度为 4.69(标准差 [SD]= 0.62),Cronbach's alpha 为 0.918。该工具的有用性评价也很高,平均得分为 4.77(标准差=0.53),Cronbach's alpha 为 0.956。使用预习工具的学生平均得分为 84.20(标准差=14.74),而未使用该工具的学生得分略低,平均得分为 80.40(标准差=13.07);不过,这一差异在统计学上并不显著(P=0.196)。尽管如此,在各种百分位数测量中,2023 年组群的得分普遍高于 2020-2022 年组群:事实证明,使用 Moodle 上 "课程 "功能的预习工具对学生学习临床程序非常有用且令人满意。要验证这些发现,还需要对更大规模的学生进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信