A Supraclassical Probabilistic Entailment Relation

Vasily Shangin
{"title":"A Supraclassical Probabilistic Entailment Relation","authors":"Vasily Shangin","doi":"10.17323/2587-8719-2023-4-215-238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an original supraclassical nontrivial plausible entailment relation $\\vapprox$ that employs Kolmogorov's probability theory. Its crucial feature is the primitiveness of a conditional probability, which one calculates with the help of the method of truth tables for classical propositional logic. I study the properties of the entailment relation in question. In particular, I show that while being supraclassical, i.e., all classical entailments and valid formulas are $\\vapprox$-valid, but not vice versa, it is not trivial and enjoys the same form of inconsistency as classical entailment ⊧ does. I specify the place of the proposed probability entailment relation in certain classifications of nonclassical entailment relations. In particular, I use Douven's analysis of some probabilistic entailment relations that contains dozens of properties that are crucial for any probabilistic entailment relation, as well as Hlobil's choosing your nonmonotonic logic: shopper’s guide, due to the fact that $\\vapprox$ is not monotonic, and Cobreros, Egré, Ripley, van Rooij's entailment relations for tolerant reasoning. At last, I perform a comparative analysis of classical, the proposed, and some other entailment relations closely related to the latter: those introduced by Bocharov, Markin, Voishvillo, Degtyarev, Ivlev, where the last two entailment relations are based on the so-called principle of reverse deduction, which is an intuitively acceptable way to connect classical and probabilistic entailment relations.","PeriodicalId":346906,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","volume":"60 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-4-215-238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper presents an original supraclassical nontrivial plausible entailment relation $\vapprox$ that employs Kolmogorov's probability theory. Its crucial feature is the primitiveness of a conditional probability, which one calculates with the help of the method of truth tables for classical propositional logic. I study the properties of the entailment relation in question. In particular, I show that while being supraclassical, i.e., all classical entailments and valid formulas are $\vapprox$-valid, but not vice versa, it is not trivial and enjoys the same form of inconsistency as classical entailment ⊧ does. I specify the place of the proposed probability entailment relation in certain classifications of nonclassical entailment relations. In particular, I use Douven's analysis of some probabilistic entailment relations that contains dozens of properties that are crucial for any probabilistic entailment relation, as well as Hlobil's choosing your nonmonotonic logic: shopper’s guide, due to the fact that $\vapprox$ is not monotonic, and Cobreros, Egré, Ripley, van Rooij's entailment relations for tolerant reasoning. At last, I perform a comparative analysis of classical, the proposed, and some other entailment relations closely related to the latter: those introduced by Bocharov, Markin, Voishvillo, Degtyarev, Ivlev, where the last two entailment relations are based on the so-called principle of reverse deduction, which is an intuitively acceptable way to connect classical and probabilistic entailment relations.
超经典的概率实体关系
本文提出了一种独创的超经典非难似然蕴涵关系 $\vapprox$,它采用了科尔莫戈罗夫的概率论。它的关键特征是条件概率的原始性,我们可以借助经典命题逻辑的真值表方法来计算它。我研究了有关蕴涵关系的特性。特别是,我证明了它是超经典的,即所有经典蕴涵和有效公式都是$\vapprox$有效的,反之亦然,但它并不琐碎,而且与经典蕴涵≺具有相同形式的不一致性。我明确了所提出的概率蕴涵关系在某些非经典蕴涵关系分类中的位置。特别是,我使用了杜文(Douven)对一些概率蕴涵关系的分析,其中包含了对任何概率蕴涵关系都至关重要的数十种性质;还使用了赫洛比尔(Hlobil)的《选择你的非单调逻辑:购物指南》(由于 $\vapprox$ 并非单调),以及科布雷罗斯(Cobreros)、埃格雷(Egré)、里普利(Ripley)、范鲁伊(van Rooij)的宽容推理蕴涵关系。最后,我对经典的、所提出的以及与后者密切相关的其他一些蕴涵关系进行了比较分析:由波恰洛夫、马尔金、沃伊什维洛、德格季亚雷夫和伊夫列夫提出的蕴涵关系,其中后两种蕴涵关系是基于所谓的反向演绎原则,这是一种直观上可以接受的连接经典和概率蕴涵关系的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信