Evaluation of T aluation of Trabecular Bone Ar abecular Bone Around the Impacted Maxillar ound the Impacted Maxillary Canine on CBCT Images by Fractal Analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zeynep Betül Arslan, B. Çelik
{"title":"Evaluation of T aluation of Trabecular Bone Ar abecular Bone Around the Impacted Maxillar ound the Impacted Maxillary Canine on CBCT Images by Fractal Analysis","authors":"Zeynep Betül Arslan, B. Çelik","doi":"10.14693/jdi.v30i3.1524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the position, angulation and surrounding trabecular bone structure of a unilateral impacted maxillary canine (IMC) tooth using fractal analysis. Methods: Cone beam computed tomography images of 50 patients (38 female, 12 male) with unilateral IMC were selected for this retrospective study. A 25x25 pixel region of interest (ROI) was selected in the trabecular bone between the premolars on the impacted and non-impacted side and fractal analysis was conducted. The angulation of unilateral impacted canines was measured and the position was categorized as vestibular, intra-alveolar and palatal. Results: Of the 50 impacted teeth, 42% were in the vestibular, 26% were in the intra-alveolar, and 32% were in the palatal position. The most common angulation angle of the IMC was 0°-15° which occurred in 44% of canines. While the bone fractal values did not statistically significantly differ between the sides, the values were 1.05 ± 0.9 on the impacted side and 1.04 ± 0.1 on the non-impacted side. No significant difference was observed in fractal values according to the position and angulation angles of the impacted maxillary canine (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The structure of trabeculation around the impacted canine tooth was no different than on the non-impacted side.","PeriodicalId":53873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v30i3.1524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the position, angulation and surrounding trabecular bone structure of a unilateral impacted maxillary canine (IMC) tooth using fractal analysis. Methods: Cone beam computed tomography images of 50 patients (38 female, 12 male) with unilateral IMC were selected for this retrospective study. A 25x25 pixel region of interest (ROI) was selected in the trabecular bone between the premolars on the impacted and non-impacted side and fractal analysis was conducted. The angulation of unilateral impacted canines was measured and the position was categorized as vestibular, intra-alveolar and palatal. Results: Of the 50 impacted teeth, 42% were in the vestibular, 26% were in the intra-alveolar, and 32% were in the palatal position. The most common angulation angle of the IMC was 0°-15° which occurred in 44% of canines. While the bone fractal values did not statistically significantly differ between the sides, the values were 1.05 ± 0.9 on the impacted side and 1.04 ± 0.1 on the non-impacted side. No significant difference was observed in fractal values according to the position and angulation angles of the impacted maxillary canine (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The structure of trabeculation around the impacted canine tooth was no different than on the non-impacted side.
通过分形分析评估 CBCT 图像中受撞击上颌犬周围骨小梁的分化情况
研究目的本研究旨在利用分形分析法评估单侧上颌撞击性犬齿(IMC)的位置、角度和周围骨小梁结构。研究方法这项回顾性研究选取了 50 名单侧上颌犬齿撞击(IMC)患者(38 名女性,12 名男性)的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像。在撞击侧和非撞击侧前臼齿之间的骨小梁中选取 25x25 像素的感兴趣区(ROI),并进行分形分析。测量单侧撞击性犬齿的角度,并将其位置分为前庭、牙槽内和腭侧。结果:在 50 颗撞击牙中,42% 位于前庭位置,26% 位于牙槽内位置,32% 位于腭侧位置。IMC最常见的角度为0°-15°,出现在44%的犬齿中。虽然两侧的骨折断值在统计学上没有明显差异,但撞击侧的骨折断值为 1.05 ± 0.9,非撞击侧的骨折断值为 1.04 ± 0.1。根据上颌受撞击犬齿的位置和成角角度不同,骨折值也无明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论阻生犬齿周围的骨小梁结构与非阻生侧没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信