Bioremediation of chlorpyrifos-contaminated soil with biduri plant (Calotropis gigantea), bacteria, and biochar: Soil fertility impact

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Rosariastuti, Sutheta Putra Mahdani, Purwanto Purwanto, Sri Hartati, S. Sumani
{"title":"Bioremediation of chlorpyrifos-contaminated soil with biduri plant (Calotropis gigantea), bacteria, and biochar: Soil fertility impact","authors":"R. Rosariastuti, Sutheta Putra Mahdani, Purwanto Purwanto, Sri Hartati, S. Sumani","doi":"10.15243/jdmlm.2024.112.5509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Industrial Revolution, agriculture was linked to environmental issues. One issue is pesticide pollution. Bioremediation is needed because plant diseases and pests cause farmers to use pesticides excessively, polluting and decreasing soil production. This study evaluated soil fertility from bioremediation with biduri plants, bacteria, and biochar on chlorpyrifos-polluted shallot-growing soil in Brebes Regency. This type of research was an experiment in a greenhouse, using a factorial experimental design with a completely randomized design, consisting of two factors, namely bioremediation agent (A0: without bioremediation agent, A1: Atlantibacter hermannii, A2: bacterial consortium) and coconut shell biochar (B0: without biochar, B1: with biochar). There were six treatment combinations, then replicated three times for each treatment, so there were 18 treatment units. The data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, Duncan Multiple Range Test, and Pearson correlation. The results showed that the best treatments that were able to improve soil fertility after bioremediation were treatments A1B0 (Atlantibacter hermannii + without biochar), A2B0 (bacterial consortium + without biochar), and A2B1 (bacterial consortium + with biochar). The A1B0 treatment (Atlantibacter hermannii + without biochar) increased the pH by 4.97%, and the soil available P was 12 times higher than the initial soil. The A2B0 (bacterial consortium + without biochar) treatment increased soil cation exchange capacity by 99.81% and soil organic C by 116% higher than the initial soil. The A2B1 (bacterial consortium + with biochar) treatment increased soil total N by 37.50% and available K by 38.47%, higher than the initial soil.","PeriodicalId":36513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management","volume":"33 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2024.112.5509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the Industrial Revolution, agriculture was linked to environmental issues. One issue is pesticide pollution. Bioremediation is needed because plant diseases and pests cause farmers to use pesticides excessively, polluting and decreasing soil production. This study evaluated soil fertility from bioremediation with biduri plants, bacteria, and biochar on chlorpyrifos-polluted shallot-growing soil in Brebes Regency. This type of research was an experiment in a greenhouse, using a factorial experimental design with a completely randomized design, consisting of two factors, namely bioremediation agent (A0: without bioremediation agent, A1: Atlantibacter hermannii, A2: bacterial consortium) and coconut shell biochar (B0: without biochar, B1: with biochar). There were six treatment combinations, then replicated three times for each treatment, so there were 18 treatment units. The data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, Duncan Multiple Range Test, and Pearson correlation. The results showed that the best treatments that were able to improve soil fertility after bioremediation were treatments A1B0 (Atlantibacter hermannii + without biochar), A2B0 (bacterial consortium + without biochar), and A2B1 (bacterial consortium + with biochar). The A1B0 treatment (Atlantibacter hermannii + without biochar) increased the pH by 4.97%, and the soil available P was 12 times higher than the initial soil. The A2B0 (bacterial consortium + without biochar) treatment increased soil cation exchange capacity by 99.81% and soil organic C by 116% higher than the initial soil. The A2B1 (bacterial consortium + with biochar) treatment increased soil total N by 37.50% and available K by 38.47%, higher than the initial soil.
利用标本菊(Calotropis gigantea)、细菌和生物炭对毒死蜱污染的土壤进行生物修复:对土壤肥力的影响
工业革命期间,农业与环境问题息息相关。其中一个问题就是农药污染。由于植物病虫害导致农民过度使用杀虫剂,污染土壤并降低土壤产量,因此需要进行生物修复。本研究评估了在布雷贝斯地区受毒死蜱污染的大葱种植土壤上使用标本兼治植物、细菌和生物炭进行生物修复所产生的土壤肥力。这类研究是在温室中进行的实验,采用完全随机设计的因子实验设计,由两个因子组成,即生物修复剂(A0:无生物修复剂,A1:Atlantibacter hermannii,A2:细菌群)和椰壳生物炭(B0:无生物炭,B1:有生物炭)。共有六个处理组合,每个处理重复三次,因此共有 18 个处理单元。采用方差分析、邓肯多元范围检验和皮尔逊相关性对数据进行了统计分析。结果表明,生物修复后能够提高土壤肥力的最佳处理是 A1B0 处理(Atlantibacter hermannii + 无生物炭)、A2B0 处理(细菌群 + 无生物炭)和 A2B1 处理(细菌群 + 有生物炭)。A1B0 处理(Atlantibacter hermannii + 无生物炭)的 pH 值提高了 4.97%,土壤中的可利用钾是初始土壤的 12 倍。A2B0(细菌群+不含生物炭)处理使土壤阳离子交换容量提高了 99.81%,土壤有机碳含量比初始土壤高出 116%。与初始土壤相比,A2B1(细菌培养基+生物炭)处理使土壤全氮增加了 37.50%,可利用钾增加了 38.47%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management
Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信