Reading and Scholarly Creativity: A Study with Spanish and Chilean Preservice Teachers

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Martín-Ezpeleta, Mario Díaz-Díaz, Y. Echegoyen-Sanz
{"title":"Reading and Scholarly Creativity: A Study with Spanish and Chilean Preservice Teachers","authors":"A. Martín-Ezpeleta, Mario Díaz-Díaz, Y. Echegoyen-Sanz","doi":"10.29333/iji.2024.17114a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this study is to analyse whether scholarly creativity can be linked to the reading process (reading preferences and reading metacognition) of preservice teachers. The research was carried out using a quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 254 Spanish and Chilean preservice teachers, who were administered online three previously validated questionnaires on creative self-perception, reading preferences and reading strategies. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis have been used. The results show a medium-high level of reading metacognition, with a preference for the use of problem-solving strategies while reading and for reading in digital format for academic purposes. There were statistically significant differences both in reading preferences, strategies and creative self-perception according to country (with Chilean students scoring higher in all of them), but no differences were found according to gender. There were positive correlations between creative self-perception in the scholarly domain and reading preferences (=.275 for academic digital and =.433 for academic print) and metacognition (=.445). Academic reading in printed format and global reading metacognition were also found to be significant predictors of self-perception in scholarly creativity, which support the theories of the need of skills in a specific domain to be able to develop creativity in such domain. The study concludes by assessing the implications of this relationship between reading and creativity, proposing the suitability of promoting both metacognitive reflections on the way to consolidating a learning focusing on the process, especially important in the case of future teachers. Keywords: reading preferences, reading metacognition, scholarly creativity, preservice teacher","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"30 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17114a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to analyse whether scholarly creativity can be linked to the reading process (reading preferences and reading metacognition) of preservice teachers. The research was carried out using a quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 254 Spanish and Chilean preservice teachers, who were administered online three previously validated questionnaires on creative self-perception, reading preferences and reading strategies. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis have been used. The results show a medium-high level of reading metacognition, with a preference for the use of problem-solving strategies while reading and for reading in digital format for academic purposes. There were statistically significant differences both in reading preferences, strategies and creative self-perception according to country (with Chilean students scoring higher in all of them), but no differences were found according to gender. There were positive correlations between creative self-perception in the scholarly domain and reading preferences (=.275 for academic digital and =.433 for academic print) and metacognition (=.445). Academic reading in printed format and global reading metacognition were also found to be significant predictors of self-perception in scholarly creativity, which support the theories of the need of skills in a specific domain to be able to develop creativity in such domain. The study concludes by assessing the implications of this relationship between reading and creativity, proposing the suitability of promoting both metacognitive reflections on the way to consolidating a learning focusing on the process, especially important in the case of future teachers. Keywords: reading preferences, reading metacognition, scholarly creativity, preservice teacher
阅读与学术创造力:对西班牙和智利职前教师的研究
本研究的主要目的是分析学术创造力是否与职前教师的阅读过程(阅读偏好和阅读元认知)有关。研究采用了定量、描述性、探索性和横断面设计。样本包括 254 名西班牙和智利的职前教师,对他们进行了网上问卷调查,问卷内容涉及创造性自我认知、阅读偏好和阅读策略。研究采用了描述性和推论性统计分析。结果表明,教师的阅读元认知水平处于中等偏上水平,在阅读时偏好使用解决问题的策略,并偏好以数字格式进行学术阅读。不同国家的学生在阅读偏好、阅读策略和创造性自我认知方面都存在显著的统计学差异(智利学生在所有方面的得分都较高),但没有发现性别差异。学术领域的创造性自我认知与阅读偏好(=.275,学术数字阅读偏好为 =.433,学术印刷阅读偏好为 =.445)和元认知(=.445)之间存在正相关。研究还发现,印刷格式的学术阅读和全球阅读元认知也是学术创造力自我认知的重要预测因素,这支持了在特定领域发展创造力需要技能的理论。研究最后评估了阅读与创造力之间这种关系的影响,提出了在巩固注重过程的学习的过程中促进元认知反思的适宜性,这对未来的教师尤为重要。关键词:阅读偏好、阅读元认知、学术创造力、职前教师
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Instruction
International Journal of Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
38.90%
发文量
244
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信