Is It Necessary to Use Digital Tools in the Flipped Classroom to Improve the Memorization Process?

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hamzi Amine, Echantoufi Noureddine, Khouna Jalal, Ajana Lotfi, Elkhattabi Khalid
{"title":"Is It Necessary to Use Digital Tools in the Flipped Classroom to Improve the Memorization Process?","authors":"Hamzi Amine, Echantoufi Noureddine, Khouna Jalal, Ajana Lotfi, Elkhattabi Khalid","doi":"10.29333/iji.2024.17134a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memorization is a crucial factor in effective learning and achieving educational goals. Recent research has suggested that short video sequences viewed by students before class can aid in acquiring and retaining basic concepts, thereby improving memorization and positively impacting the learning process in the flipped classroom approach. However, frequent use of digital tools among adolescents has been found to negatively impact cognitive functions such as memorization. It is worth noting that the traditional use of paper-based materials has been found to have a positive impact on memorization, particularly among learners who are easily distracted by digital devices or experience eye strain from prolonged screen use. Printed materials can offer a more tactile experience, allowing learners to physically highlight and annotate text, which can aid in the encoding and retrieval of information. This study aimed to assess the role of digital tools in the flipped classroom approach and determine if they could be substituted by paper-based materials. To achieve this, a comparative study was conducted between 35 students using digital tools in their flipped classroom (FCDS) and 31 students using paper-based materials (FCPS). The study involved administering pre-tests and post-tests to both groups to evaluate their ability to retrieve basic concepts and assess the effectiveness of their learning in life and earth sciences. The results indicate that learners were able to retrieve knowledge effectively regardless of the medium used and that the positive effect of the FCDS on recall during learning is comparable to that of the FCPS. Keywords: digital tools, flipped classroom, memorization, learning process, life, earth","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"140 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17134a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memorization is a crucial factor in effective learning and achieving educational goals. Recent research has suggested that short video sequences viewed by students before class can aid in acquiring and retaining basic concepts, thereby improving memorization and positively impacting the learning process in the flipped classroom approach. However, frequent use of digital tools among adolescents has been found to negatively impact cognitive functions such as memorization. It is worth noting that the traditional use of paper-based materials has been found to have a positive impact on memorization, particularly among learners who are easily distracted by digital devices or experience eye strain from prolonged screen use. Printed materials can offer a more tactile experience, allowing learners to physically highlight and annotate text, which can aid in the encoding and retrieval of information. This study aimed to assess the role of digital tools in the flipped classroom approach and determine if they could be substituted by paper-based materials. To achieve this, a comparative study was conducted between 35 students using digital tools in their flipped classroom (FCDS) and 31 students using paper-based materials (FCPS). The study involved administering pre-tests and post-tests to both groups to evaluate their ability to retrieve basic concepts and assess the effectiveness of their learning in life and earth sciences. The results indicate that learners were able to retrieve knowledge effectively regardless of the medium used and that the positive effect of the FCDS on recall during learning is comparable to that of the FCPS. Keywords: digital tools, flipped classroom, memorization, learning process, life, earth
有必要在翻转课堂中使用数字工具来改进记忆过程吗?
记忆是有效学习和实现教育目标的关键因素。最近的研究表明,学生在课前观看视频短片有助于掌握和保留基本概念,从而提高记忆效果,并对翻转课堂的学习过程产生积极影响。然而,研究发现,青少年频繁使用数字工具会对记忆等认知功能产生负面影响。值得注意的是,传统的纸质材料对记忆有积极影响,特别是对那些容易被数字设备分散注意力或因长时间使用屏幕而眼睛疲劳的学习者。印刷材料可以提供更多的触觉体验,让学习者可以实际突出显示和注释文本,这有助于信息的编码和检索。本研究旨在评估数字工具在翻转课堂方法中的作用,并确定是否可以用纸质材料替代数字工具。为此,我们对在翻转课堂中使用数字工具的 35 名学生(FCDS)和使用纸质材料的 31 名学生(FCPS)进行了比较研究。研究包括对两组学生进行前测和后测,以评估他们检索基本概念的能力,并评估他们在生命科学和地球科学方面的学习效果。结果表明,无论使用哪种媒介,学习者都能有效地检索知识,而且FCDS在学习过程中对回忆的积极作用与FCPS不相上下。关键词: 数字工具;翻转课堂;记忆;学习过程;生命;地球
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Instruction
International Journal of Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
38.90%
发文量
244
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信